Magic and Law at the Border. The Early Medieval Leges

Daniela Fruscione
{"title":"Magic and Law at the Border. The Early Medieval Leges","authors":"Daniela Fruscione","doi":"10.36253/lea-1824-484x-14936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on the concerns of the authorities as shown in the provisions on witchcraft and magic contained in the Romano-Germanic laws enacted from the sixth century (leges). These provisions shed light on what was prohibited and what was designated as magic; however, the attitude of the authorities towards magic and witchcraft was not univocal, mainly because of the religious and ethnic bipolarism underlying early European legislation on magic. Early medieval laws allow observing the formal expression of areas through which public concerns over the practice of magic operated. In most leges the use of magic was not punished as a religious offence, but rather for its destabilizing aspect regarding the social order. Moreover, the Church’s attitude towards magic was not monolithic: the official Church coexisted with local magical customs. The early medieval leges confirm that magic is a category dependent on the perceiver, encompassing practices and beliefs that border on other features of human experience, such as religion and law itself.","PeriodicalId":383989,"journal":{"name":"LEA - Lingue e Letterature d'Oriente e d'Occidente","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LEA - Lingue e Letterature d'Oriente e d'Occidente","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/lea-1824-484x-14936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article focuses on the concerns of the authorities as shown in the provisions on witchcraft and magic contained in the Romano-Germanic laws enacted from the sixth century (leges). These provisions shed light on what was prohibited and what was designated as magic; however, the attitude of the authorities towards magic and witchcraft was not univocal, mainly because of the religious and ethnic bipolarism underlying early European legislation on magic. Early medieval laws allow observing the formal expression of areas through which public concerns over the practice of magic operated. In most leges the use of magic was not punished as a religious offence, but rather for its destabilizing aspect regarding the social order. Moreover, the Church’s attitude towards magic was not monolithic: the official Church coexisted with local magical customs. The early medieval leges confirm that magic is a category dependent on the perceiver, encompassing practices and beliefs that border on other features of human experience, such as religion and law itself.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
边境上的魔法与法律中世纪早期的法律
本文的重点是自六世纪起颁布的罗马-日耳曼法律(leges)中有关巫术和魔法的规定所显示的当局的关切。这些条款阐明了什么是被禁止的,什么是被指定为魔法的;然而,当局对魔法和巫术的态度并不是一成不变的,这主要是由于欧洲早期有关魔法的立法所蕴含的宗教和种族两极主义。中世纪早期的法律允许观察公众对魔法实践的关注所涉及领域的正式表述。在大多数法律中,使用魔法并不作为宗教犯罪受到惩罚,而是因为它破坏了社会秩序的稳定。此外,教会对魔法的态度并非铁板一块:官方教会与地方魔法习俗并存。中世纪早期的法律证实,魔法是一个依赖于感知者的范畴,包括与人类经验的其他特征(如宗教和法律本身)相联系的实践和信仰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Decadent Culturemes. Translating Bernard Shaw’s Widowers’ Houses into Italian Translating Decadence Black Feathers and Poison Wine Decadent Aesthetics in Davíð Stefánsson’s Poetry Decadent Aesthetics in Cyril Scott’s Translations and Song Settings Les Sensations détraquées de Strindberg. “Perdre le Nord”?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1