A Cognitive Discourse Study of the US’s Cognition of China in Sino-American Strategic Competition

Bin Zhou
{"title":"A Cognitive Discourse Study of the US’s Cognition of China in Sino-American Strategic Competition","authors":"Bin Zhou","doi":"10.5430/sass.v9n1p1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the US initiated the strategic competition with China, many scholars are attracted by this topic. Although they have studied it from many aspects, few noticed the importance of the US’s cognition of China and gave it a comprehensive and scientific study. By using non-classical taxonomic structures of categorization theories in cognitive linguistics, and distribution of capabilities among units, interaction between units, and interactions between unit and security complexes in theories of international relations, this article studies the US’s cognition of China in SinoAmerican strategic competition from the perspective of cognitive discourse study. After analyzing the non-classical categories the US uses to recognize China in United States Innovation and Competition Act of 2021, this article discovers that the US regards China’s approaching capability has threatened its hegemony; the US possesses a complex categorizing model, and arrogant and anxious mentalities; the gaps between the US and China are being narrowed; the US’s domestic political structure has flaws; the US cannot contain China alone, but it has strong international integrating abilities to do so. Compared with traditional international relations study, this study not only deepens our understanding of the US’s cognition of China by disclosing its categorizing model on China and its mentalities, but also establishes a scientific, objective, convenient, and feasible operation paradigm for international relations study by integrating the methods of discourse analysis and international system analysis. The future study can explore the impacts on East Asian security of the US’s cognition of China with the help of security theories in international relations.","PeriodicalId":369030,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Asian Social Science","volume":"21 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Asian Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/sass.v9n1p1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the US initiated the strategic competition with China, many scholars are attracted by this topic. Although they have studied it from many aspects, few noticed the importance of the US’s cognition of China and gave it a comprehensive and scientific study. By using non-classical taxonomic structures of categorization theories in cognitive linguistics, and distribution of capabilities among units, interaction between units, and interactions between unit and security complexes in theories of international relations, this article studies the US’s cognition of China in SinoAmerican strategic competition from the perspective of cognitive discourse study. After analyzing the non-classical categories the US uses to recognize China in United States Innovation and Competition Act of 2021, this article discovers that the US regards China’s approaching capability has threatened its hegemony; the US possesses a complex categorizing model, and arrogant and anxious mentalities; the gaps between the US and China are being narrowed; the US’s domestic political structure has flaws; the US cannot contain China alone, but it has strong international integrating abilities to do so. Compared with traditional international relations study, this study not only deepens our understanding of the US’s cognition of China by disclosing its categorizing model on China and its mentalities, but also establishes a scientific, objective, convenient, and feasible operation paradigm for international relations study by integrating the methods of discourse analysis and international system analysis. The future study can explore the impacts on East Asian security of the US’s cognition of China with the help of security theories in international relations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中美战略竞争中美国对华认知的认知话语研究
自美国发起对华战略竞争以来,许多学者都被这一话题所吸引。虽然他们从多方面进行了研究,但很少有人注意到美国对华认知的重要性,并对其进行全面、科学的研究。本文运用认知语言学中分类理论的非经典分类结构,以及国际关系理论中单元之间的能力分布、单元之间的互动关系、单元与安全复合体之间的互动关系,从认知话语研究的角度对中美战略竞争中的美国对华认知进行了研究。通过分析美国在《2021年美国创新与竞争法案》中对中国认知的非经典范畴,本文发现美国认为中国的逼近能力已经威胁到其霸权地位;美国拥有复杂的归类模式和傲慢焦虑的心态;中美差距正在缩小;美国国内政治结构存在缺陷;美国无法单独遏制中国,但拥有强大的国际整合能力。与传统的国际关系研究相比,本研究不仅通过揭示美国对中国的分类模式及其心态,加深了我们对美国对华认知的理解,而且通过整合话语分析和国际体系分析的方法,建立了科学、客观、便捷、可行的国际关系研究操作范式。未来的研究可以借助国际关系中的安全理论,探讨美国对华认知对东亚安全的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Cognitive Discourse Study of the US’s Cognition of China in Sino-American Strategic Competition Evaluating a Field Theory of Consciousness and Social Change: Group Practice of Transcendental Meditation and Homicide Trends Science, As a Universal Tale New Administrative Practice: The Organizational Identity Operation of Teacher Departments Social Change and Development: A Critical Comparison of Classical with Contemporary Sociological Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1