A Structured Narrative Prompt for Prompting Narratives from Large Language Models: Sentiment Assessment of ChatGPT-Generated Narratives and Real Tweets

IF 2.8 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Future Internet Pub Date : 2023-11-23 DOI:10.3390/fi15120375
Christopher J Lynch, Erik J. Jensen, Virginia Zamponi, Kevin O’Brien, Erika F. Frydenlund, Ross Gore
{"title":"A Structured Narrative Prompt for Prompting Narratives from Large Language Models: Sentiment Assessment of ChatGPT-Generated Narratives and Real Tweets","authors":"Christopher J Lynch, Erik J. Jensen, Virginia Zamponi, Kevin O’Brien, Erika F. Frydenlund, Ross Gore","doi":"10.3390/fi15120375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large language models (LLMs) excel in providing natural language responses that sound authoritative, reflect knowledge of the context area, and can present from a range of varied perspectives. Agent-based models and simulations consist of simulated agents that interact within a simulated environment to explore societal, social, and ethical, among other, problems. Simulated agents generate large volumes of data and discerning useful and relevant content is an onerous task. LLMs can help in communicating agents’ perspectives on key life events by providing natural language narratives. However, these narratives should be factual, transparent, and reproducible. Therefore, we present a structured narrative prompt for sending queries to LLMs, we experiment with the narrative generation process using OpenAI’s ChatGPT, and we assess statistically significant differences across 11 Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) sentiment levels between the generated narratives and real tweets using chi-squared tests and Fisher’s exact tests. The narrative prompt structure effectively yields narratives with the desired components from ChatGPT. In four out of forty-four categories, ChatGPT generated narratives which have sentiment scores that were not discernibly different, in terms of statistical significance (alpha level α=0.05), from the sentiment expressed in real tweets. Three outcomes are provided: (1) a list of benefits and challenges for LLMs in narrative generation; (2) a structured prompt for requesting narratives of an LLM chatbot based on simulated agents’ information; (3) an assessment of statistical significance in the sentiment prevalence of the generated narratives compared to real tweets. This indicates significant promise in the utilization of LLMs for helping to connect a simulated agent’s experiences with real people.","PeriodicalId":37982,"journal":{"name":"Future Internet","volume":"78 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Internet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15120375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) excel in providing natural language responses that sound authoritative, reflect knowledge of the context area, and can present from a range of varied perspectives. Agent-based models and simulations consist of simulated agents that interact within a simulated environment to explore societal, social, and ethical, among other, problems. Simulated agents generate large volumes of data and discerning useful and relevant content is an onerous task. LLMs can help in communicating agents’ perspectives on key life events by providing natural language narratives. However, these narratives should be factual, transparent, and reproducible. Therefore, we present a structured narrative prompt for sending queries to LLMs, we experiment with the narrative generation process using OpenAI’s ChatGPT, and we assess statistically significant differences across 11 Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) sentiment levels between the generated narratives and real tweets using chi-squared tests and Fisher’s exact tests. The narrative prompt structure effectively yields narratives with the desired components from ChatGPT. In four out of forty-four categories, ChatGPT generated narratives which have sentiment scores that were not discernibly different, in terms of statistical significance (alpha level α=0.05), from the sentiment expressed in real tweets. Three outcomes are provided: (1) a list of benefits and challenges for LLMs in narrative generation; (2) a structured prompt for requesting narratives of an LLM chatbot based on simulated agents’ information; (3) an assessment of statistical significance in the sentiment prevalence of the generated narratives compared to real tweets. This indicates significant promise in the utilization of LLMs for helping to connect a simulated agent’s experiences with real people.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于从大型语言模型中提示叙述的结构化叙述提示:ChatGPT 生成的叙述和真实推文的情感评估
大型语言模型(LLMs)擅长提供听起来具有权威性的自然语言回答,反映相关领域的知识,并能从各种不同的角度进行表述。基于代理的模型和模拟由模拟代理组成,这些代理在模拟环境中进行互动,以探索社会、社会和伦理等问题。模拟代理会产生大量数据,而辨别有用和相关的内容是一项繁重的任务。LLM 可以通过提供自然语言叙述,帮助交流代理对关键生活事件的看法。然而,这些叙述应该是真实、透明和可复制的。因此,我们提出了一种结构化的叙事提示,用于向 LLMs 发送询问,我们使用 OpenAI 的 ChatGPT 对叙事生成过程进行了实验,并使用卡方检验和费雪精确检验评估了生成的叙事与真实推文之间在 11 种正负情感表(PANAS)情感水平上的显著差异。ChatGPT 的叙事提示结构有效地生成了具有所需成分的叙事。在 44 个类别中的 4 个类别中,ChatGPT 生成的叙述语的情感得分与真实推文中表达的情感没有明显差异(α 水平 α=0.05)。本文提供了三项成果:(1) 语言学习者在叙事生成方面的优势和挑战列表;(2) 基于模拟代理信息的语言学习者聊天机器人请求叙事的结构化提示;(3) 与真实推文相比,所生成叙事的情感流行度的统计学意义评估。这表明,利用 LLM 帮助将模拟代理的经历与真人联系起来大有可为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Future Internet
Future Internet Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
303
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Internet is a scholarly open access journal which provides an advanced forum for science and research concerned with evolution of Internet technologies and related smart systems for “Net-Living” development. The general reference subject is therefore the evolution towards the future internet ecosystem, which is feeding a continuous, intensive, artificial transformation of the lived environment, for a widespread and significant improvement of well-being in all spheres of human life (private, public, professional). Included topics are: • advanced communications network infrastructures • evolution of internet basic services • internet of things • netted peripheral sensors • industrial internet • centralized and distributed data centers • embedded computing • cloud computing • software defined network functions and network virtualization • cloud-let and fog-computing • big data, open data and analytical tools • cyber-physical systems • network and distributed operating systems • web services • semantic structures and related software tools • artificial and augmented intelligence • augmented reality • system interoperability and flexible service composition • smart mission-critical system architectures • smart terminals and applications • pro-sumer tools for application design and development • cyber security compliance • privacy compliance • reliability compliance • dependability compliance • accountability compliance • trust compliance • technical quality of basic services.
期刊最新文献
Controllable Queuing System with Elastic Traffic and Signals for Resource Capacity Planning in 5G Network Slicing Internet-of-Things Traffic Analysis and Device Identification Based on Two-Stage Clustering in Smart Home Environments Resource Indexing and Querying in Large Connected Environments An Analysis of Methods and Metrics for Task Scheduling in Fog Computing Evaluating Embeddings from Pre-Trained Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Educational Content Recommendation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1