Criteria and factors of digital activism effectiveness: expert assessments

S. B. Abramova
{"title":"Criteria and factors of digital activism effectiveness: expert assessments","authors":"S. B. Abramova","doi":"10.25136/2409-7144.2023.11.69047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the problem of the effectiveness of digital participation, and sets the goal of defining criteria for measuring it and identifying factors that act as barriers to the implementation and achievement of full results of digital civic initiatives. The diversity of understanding efficiency is revealed in the context of the specifics of social processes and digital communications. It is shown that in the Russian and foreign scientific sociological field has not been formed a wide and substantiated experience and methodology for studying the effectiveness of online forms of civic activism, which determines the relevance of the research topic, as well as the need for a methodological solution to the problem. The empirical basis of the study is a survey of 16 experts in the field of digital activism from 8 federal districts of the Russian Federation conducted. The novelty of the work is related to the typology of the criteria for the effectiveness of digital participation, based on the analysis of expert assessments: effectiveness as effectiveness, effectiveness as the level of activity and involvement of citizens, effectiveness as development (creativity and innovation), social effectiveness and social effects, effectiveness as dialogue and the development of social partnership. Within each type there is a detailed description of the indicators and quotes from experts characterizing this performance indicator. It has been recorded that experts perceive the situation with the development of digital civic participation as dual, in which positive trends collide with barrier factors and conditions. Key factors-barriers have been identified: negative ideas about the effectiveness of digital activism, low awareness of the population about digital technologies and opportunities for participation, formalization and simulation of citizen activity, etc. Taking into account the results obtained, the prospects for future research are related to the study of the social effects of digital activism, identifying criteria for effectiveness in the assessments of the initiators and participants of activism, government officials and the media.","PeriodicalId":503817,"journal":{"name":"Социодинамика","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Социодинамика","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7144.2023.11.69047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the problem of the effectiveness of digital participation, and sets the goal of defining criteria for measuring it and identifying factors that act as barriers to the implementation and achievement of full results of digital civic initiatives. The diversity of understanding efficiency is revealed in the context of the specifics of social processes and digital communications. It is shown that in the Russian and foreign scientific sociological field has not been formed a wide and substantiated experience and methodology for studying the effectiveness of online forms of civic activism, which determines the relevance of the research topic, as well as the need for a methodological solution to the problem. The empirical basis of the study is a survey of 16 experts in the field of digital activism from 8 federal districts of the Russian Federation conducted. The novelty of the work is related to the typology of the criteria for the effectiveness of digital participation, based on the analysis of expert assessments: effectiveness as effectiveness, effectiveness as the level of activity and involvement of citizens, effectiveness as development (creativity and innovation), social effectiveness and social effects, effectiveness as dialogue and the development of social partnership. Within each type there is a detailed description of the indicators and quotes from experts characterizing this performance indicator. It has been recorded that experts perceive the situation with the development of digital civic participation as dual, in which positive trends collide with barrier factors and conditions. Key factors-barriers have been identified: negative ideas about the effectiveness of digital activism, low awareness of the population about digital technologies and opportunities for participation, formalization and simulation of citizen activity, etc. Taking into account the results obtained, the prospects for future research are related to the study of the social effects of digital activism, identifying criteria for effectiveness in the assessments of the initiators and participants of activism, government officials and the media.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字行动主义有效性的标准和因素:专家评估
这篇文章探讨了数字参与的效率问题,并确定了目标,即界定衡量数字参与效率的标准,找出阻碍数字公民行动的实施和取得全面成果的因素。文章从社会进程和数字通信的具体情况出发,揭示了对效率理解的多样性。研究表明,在俄罗斯和国外的科学社会学领域,还没有形成研究在线形式公民行动有效性的广泛而可靠的经验和方法,这就决定了研究课题的相关性,以及从方法论角度解决问题的必要性。研究的实证基础是对来自俄罗斯联邦 8 个联邦区的 16 名数字活动领域专家进行的调查。这项工作的新颖之处在于根据对专家评估的分析,对数字参与的有效性标准进行了分 类:作为有效性的有效性、作为公民活动和参与水平的有效性、作为发展(创造和创新)的 有效性、社会有效性和社会效果、作为对话和发展社会伙伴关系的有效性。在每种类型中,都有对指标的详细描述和专家对该绩效指标特点的引述。根据记录,专家们认为数字公民参与的发展具有双重性,积极的趋势与障碍因素和条件相冲突。已确定的主要障碍因素包括:对数字活动有效性的消极看法、民众对数字技术和参与机会的认识不足、公民活动的正规化和模拟化等。考虑到所取得的成果,未来研究的前景与研究数字激进主义的社会影响、确定激进主义发起者和参与者、政府官员和媒体评估有效性的标准有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Generation Z media consumption practices in social media The attitude of the Tatars of the Kirov region (Russia) to religious rites Family traditions of the titular ethnic groups of Southern Siberia (according to the 2022 study) Features of career trajectories of graduates of Altai universities (using the example of a sociological study in Barnaul) Understanding the Tourist Gaze in John Urry's Sociological Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1