IT’s a Matter of Trust: Literature reviews and analyses of human trust in information technology

IF 5.8 3区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of Information Technology Pub Date : 2024-01-03 DOI:10.1177/02683962231226397
Mary C Lacity, S. Schuetz, Le Kuai, Zach Steelman
{"title":"IT’s a Matter of Trust: Literature reviews and analyses of human trust in information technology","authors":"Mary C Lacity, S. Schuetz, Le Kuai, Zach Steelman","doi":"10.1177/02683962231226397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we review and analyze two literatures on the construct of human trust in IT artifacts and in the entities that source, operate, and govern IT. The first literature review focuses on defining of the construct of trust across a range of disciplines. Our analysis of this literature identified 13 assumptions about the nature of trust. The assumptions illustrate the complexities of human trust. The second literature review focused on 214 empirical studies of the construct of trust published in the AIS Senior Scholars’ Basket of Eight journals. We analyze this literature to identify IS scholar’s most common assessments of trust from qualitative studies and most common measures of trust from quantitative studies. As a cumulative body of knowledge, IS scholars have deeply examined different types of trust. IS scholars have also extensively examined the assumption that trust is dynamic, as evidenced by the many qualitative papers that examined trust as a process, and trust in Web2 technologies, which are characterized by centralized applications and centralized governance. While the IS scholarly community has established a substantial tradition around the construct of trust, there is still interesting work to be done. With recent releases of open generative AI and with the rise of Web3 technologies like blockchains that purport to be “trustless”, the construct of trust in IT needs to be re-examined in these emerging contexts. We also encourage more research on trust in bi-directional relationships, on the limits of transitive trust, and on the construct of distrust.","PeriodicalId":50178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Technology","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962231226397","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we review and analyze two literatures on the construct of human trust in IT artifacts and in the entities that source, operate, and govern IT. The first literature review focuses on defining of the construct of trust across a range of disciplines. Our analysis of this literature identified 13 assumptions about the nature of trust. The assumptions illustrate the complexities of human trust. The second literature review focused on 214 empirical studies of the construct of trust published in the AIS Senior Scholars’ Basket of Eight journals. We analyze this literature to identify IS scholar’s most common assessments of trust from qualitative studies and most common measures of trust from quantitative studies. As a cumulative body of knowledge, IS scholars have deeply examined different types of trust. IS scholars have also extensively examined the assumption that trust is dynamic, as evidenced by the many qualitative papers that examined trust as a process, and trust in Web2 technologies, which are characterized by centralized applications and centralized governance. While the IS scholarly community has established a substantial tradition around the construct of trust, there is still interesting work to be done. With recent releases of open generative AI and with the rise of Web3 technologies like blockchains that purport to be “trustless”, the construct of trust in IT needs to be re-examined in these emerging contexts. We also encourage more research on trust in bi-directional relationships, on the limits of transitive trust, and on the construct of distrust.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息技术事关信任:关于人类对信息技术信任的文献综述和分析
在本文中,我们回顾并分析了关于人类对信息技术人工制品以及信息技术的来源、运营和管理实体的信任结构的两篇文献。第一篇文献综述的重点是界定各学科中的信任概念。通过对这些文献的分析,我们确定了有关信任本质的 13 项假设。这些假设说明了人类信任的复杂性。第二篇文献综述的重点是在 AIS 高级学者篮子中的八种期刊上发表的 214 篇有关信任构建的实证研究。我们对这些文献进行分析,从定性研究中找出 IS 学者最常用的信任评估方法,从定量研究中找出最常用的信任测量方法。作为知识的积累,信息系统学者深入研究了不同类型的信任。IS 学者还广泛研究了信任是动态的这一假设,许多定性研究论文将信任视为一个过程,以及对以集中式应用和集中式管理为特点的 Web2 技术的信任,都证明了这一点。虽然信息系统学术界已经围绕信任的构建建立了一个重要的传统,但仍有许多有趣的工作要做。随着最近开放生成式人工智能的发布,以及声称 "无信任 "的区块链等 Web3 技术的兴起,我们需要在这些新兴环境中重新审视信息技术中的信任结构。我们还鼓励对双向关系中的信任、传递性信任的局限性以及不信任的构造开展更多研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Information Technology
Journal of Information Technology 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
1.80%
发文量
19
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Information Technology (JIT) is to provide academically robust papers, research, critical reviews and opinions on the organisational, social and management issues associated with significant information-based technologies. It is designed to be read by academics, scholars, advanced students, reflective practitioners, and those seeking an update on current experience and future prospects in relation to contemporary information and communications technology themes. JIT focuses on new research addressing technology and the management of IT, including strategy, change, infrastructure, human resources, sourcing, system development and implementation, communications, technology developments, technology futures, national policies and standards. It also publishes articles that advance our understanding and application of research approaches and methods.
期刊最新文献
A critical realist approach to agent-based modeling: Unlocking prediction in non-positivist paradigms A Temporal Dynamics Framework and Methodology for Computationally Intensive Social Media Research A Qualitative Systematic Review of Trust in Technology IT’s a Matter of Trust: Literature reviews and analyses of human trust in information technology Vendor capabilities development in blockchain sourcing: a parallel play approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1