A critical realist approach to agent-based modeling: Unlocking prediction in non-positivist paradigms

IF 5.8 3区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of Information Technology Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1177/02683962241280657
Annamina Rieder, Saurav Chakraborty, Sandeep Goyal, Donald J Berndt
{"title":"A critical realist approach to agent-based modeling: Unlocking prediction in non-positivist paradigms","authors":"Annamina Rieder, Saurav Chakraborty, Sandeep Goyal, Donald J Berndt","doi":"10.1177/02683962241280657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Information systems (IS) scholarship and practice aim to predict phenomena and outcomes of IS use. These phenomena of IS use are typically set in multi-leveled, dynamic, and complex contexts that lend explanation to the non-positivist tradition in IS research. However, limited methodological options exist to make predictions. In this research, we propose stratified agent-based modeling, a step-by-step approach that enables prediction in non-positivist paradigms. Drawing upon the critical realist philosophy of science, which suggests ontological stratification and assumes open systems, we adopt a retroduction-based explanation formation and agent-based modeling to simulate different potential states of a complex system. The critical step in combining critical realism with agent-based modeling involves identifying and codifying the underlying generative mechanisms (i.e., causal powers) into various components of the agent-based model. We propose four steps toward prediction under the critical realist paradigm: (1) capturing the phenomenon, (2) identifying the generative mechanism, (3) building the agent-based model, and (4) simulating states of the system. We present an exemplar of our proposed approach that investigates the effectiveness of strategies to combat malicious content propagation in social networks.","PeriodicalId":50178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962241280657","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Information systems (IS) scholarship and practice aim to predict phenomena and outcomes of IS use. These phenomena of IS use are typically set in multi-leveled, dynamic, and complex contexts that lend explanation to the non-positivist tradition in IS research. However, limited methodological options exist to make predictions. In this research, we propose stratified agent-based modeling, a step-by-step approach that enables prediction in non-positivist paradigms. Drawing upon the critical realist philosophy of science, which suggests ontological stratification and assumes open systems, we adopt a retroduction-based explanation formation and agent-based modeling to simulate different potential states of a complex system. The critical step in combining critical realism with agent-based modeling involves identifying and codifying the underlying generative mechanisms (i.e., causal powers) into various components of the agent-based model. We propose four steps toward prediction under the critical realist paradigm: (1) capturing the phenomenon, (2) identifying the generative mechanism, (3) building the agent-based model, and (4) simulating states of the system. We present an exemplar of our proposed approach that investigates the effectiveness of strategies to combat malicious content propagation in social networks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于代理建模的批判现实主义方法:在非实证主义范式中解开预测之谜
信息系统(IS)的学术研究和实践旨在预测 IS 使用的现象和结果。这些使用信息系统的现象通常是在多层次、动态和复杂的背景下出现的,这就为信息系统研究中的非实证主义传统提供了解释。然而,用于预测的方法却很有限。在这项研究中,我们提出了基于分层代理的建模方法,这是一种能够在非实证主义范式中进行预测的循序渐进的方法。批判现实主义科学哲学提出本体论分层并假定系统是开放的,我们借鉴这一哲学,采用基于逆向归纳的解释形成和基于代理的建模来模拟复杂系统的不同潜在状态。将批判现实主义与基于代理的建模结合起来的关键步骤是识别潜在的生成机制(即因果力量)并将其编入基于代理的模型的各个组成部分。我们提出了在批判现实主义范式下进行预测的四个步骤:(1) 捕捉现象,(2) 识别生成机制,(3) 建立基于代理的模型,(4) 模拟系统状态。我们介绍了我们提出的方法的一个范例,该范例研究了打击社交网络中恶意内容传播的策略的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Information Technology
Journal of Information Technology 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
1.80%
发文量
19
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Information Technology (JIT) is to provide academically robust papers, research, critical reviews and opinions on the organisational, social and management issues associated with significant information-based technologies. It is designed to be read by academics, scholars, advanced students, reflective practitioners, and those seeking an update on current experience and future prospects in relation to contemporary information and communications technology themes. JIT focuses on new research addressing technology and the management of IT, including strategy, change, infrastructure, human resources, sourcing, system development and implementation, communications, technology developments, technology futures, national policies and standards. It also publishes articles that advance our understanding and application of research approaches and methods.
期刊最新文献
A critical realist approach to agent-based modeling: Unlocking prediction in non-positivist paradigms A Temporal Dynamics Framework and Methodology for Computationally Intensive Social Media Research Digital sourcing: A discussion of agential, semiotic, infrastructural, combinatorial, and economic shifts Shaping Innovation Outcomes: The Role of CIOs for Firms’ Digital Exploration A Qualitative Systematic Review of Trust in Technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1