Clinical parameter-based prediction model for neurosyphilis risk stratification.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Epidemiology and Infection Pub Date : 2024-01-15 DOI:10.1017/S0950268824000074
Yilan Yang, Xin Gu, Lin Zhu, Yuanyuan Cheng, Haikong Lu, Zhifang Guan, Mei Shi, Liyan Ni, Ruirui Peng, Wei Zhao, Juan Wu, Tengfei Qi, Fuquan Long, Zhe Chai, Weiming Gong, Meiping Ye, Pingyu Zhou
{"title":"Clinical parameter-based prediction model for neurosyphilis risk stratification.","authors":"Yilan Yang, Xin Gu, Lin Zhu, Yuanyuan Cheng, Haikong Lu, Zhifang Guan, Mei Shi, Liyan Ni, Ruirui Peng, Wei Zhao, Juan Wu, Tengfei Qi, Fuquan Long, Zhe Chai, Weiming Gong, Meiping Ye, Pingyu Zhou","doi":"10.1017/S0950268824000074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurately predicting neurosyphilis prior to a lumbar puncture (LP) is critical for the prompt management of neurosyphilis. However, a valid and reliable model for this purpose is still lacking. This study aimed to develop a nomogram for the accurate identification of neurosyphilis in patients with syphilis. The training cohort included 9,504 syphilis patients who underwent initial neurosyphilis evaluation between 2009 and 2020, while the validation cohort comprised 526 patients whose data were prospectively collected from January 2021 to September 2021. Neurosyphilis was observed in 35.8% (3,400/9,504) of the training cohort and 37.6% (198/526) of the validation cohort. The nomogram incorporated factors such as age, male gender, neurological and psychiatric symptoms, serum RPR, a mucous plaque of the larynx and nose, a history of other STD infections, and co-diabetes. The model exhibited good performance with concordance indexes of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.83-0.85) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.78-0.86) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively, along with well-fitted calibration curves. This study developed a precise nomogram to predict neurosyphilis risk in syphilis patients, with potential implications for early detection prior to an LP.</p>","PeriodicalId":11721,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiology and Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10894895/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268824000074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurately predicting neurosyphilis prior to a lumbar puncture (LP) is critical for the prompt management of neurosyphilis. However, a valid and reliable model for this purpose is still lacking. This study aimed to develop a nomogram for the accurate identification of neurosyphilis in patients with syphilis. The training cohort included 9,504 syphilis patients who underwent initial neurosyphilis evaluation between 2009 and 2020, while the validation cohort comprised 526 patients whose data were prospectively collected from January 2021 to September 2021. Neurosyphilis was observed in 35.8% (3,400/9,504) of the training cohort and 37.6% (198/526) of the validation cohort. The nomogram incorporated factors such as age, male gender, neurological and psychiatric symptoms, serum RPR, a mucous plaque of the larynx and nose, a history of other STD infections, and co-diabetes. The model exhibited good performance with concordance indexes of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.83-0.85) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.78-0.86) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively, along with well-fitted calibration curves. This study developed a precise nomogram to predict neurosyphilis risk in syphilis patients, with potential implications for early detection prior to an LP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于临床参数的神经梅毒风险分层预测模型
在腰椎穿刺(LP)前准确预测神经梅毒对于及时治疗神经梅毒至关重要。然而,目前仍缺乏有效、可靠的预测模型。本研究旨在开发一种提名图,用于准确识别梅毒患者的神经梅毒。训练队列包括2009年至2020年期间接受神经梅毒初步评估的9504名梅毒患者,验证队列包括2021年1月至2021年9月期间前瞻性收集数据的526名患者。35.8%(3400/9504)的训练队列和37.6%(198/526)的验证队列中观察到了神经梅毒。提名图纳入了年龄、男性性别、神经和精神症状、血清 RPR、喉部和鼻腔粘膜斑块、其他性传播疾病感染史以及合并糖尿病等因素。该模型表现出良好的性能,其训练组和验证组的一致性指数分别为 0.84(95% CI,0.83-0.85)和 0.82(95% CI,0.78-0.86),校准曲线拟合良好。该研究开发了一种精确的提名图,用于预测梅毒患者的神经梅毒风险,对在LP之前进行早期检测具有潜在的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemiology and Infection
Epidemiology and Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
366
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiology & Infection publishes original reports and reviews on all aspects of infection in humans and animals. Particular emphasis is given to the epidemiology, prevention and control of infectious diseases. The scope covers the zoonoses, outbreaks, food hygiene, vaccine studies, statistics and the clinical, social and public-health aspects of infectious disease, as well as some tropical infections. It has become the key international periodical in which to find the latest reports on recently discovered infections and new technology. For those concerned with policy and planning for the control of infections, the papers on mathematical modelling of epidemics caused by historical, current and emergent infections are of particular value.
期刊最新文献
A systematic review and meta-analysis of ambient temperature and precipitation with infections from five food-borne bacterial pathogens. High Campylobacter diversity in retail chicken: epidemiologically important strains may be missed with current sampling methods. Prevalence and persistence of Neisseria meningitidis carriage in Swedish university students - CORRIGENDUM. Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 prevalence from repeated pooled testing: application to Swiss routine data. Risk of central line-associated bloodstream infections during COVID-19 pandemic in intensive care patients in a tertiary care centre in Saudi Arabia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1