Effect of lattice type on biomechanical and osseointegration properties of 3D-printed porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds

IF 6.8 3区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL International Journal of Bioprinting Pub Date : 2024-01-08 DOI:10.36922/ijb.1698
Jiantao Liu, Kao Wang, Runqing Wang, Zhanhai Yin, Xiaoling Zhou, Aofei Xu, Xiwei Zhang, Yiming Li, Ruiyan Wang, Shuyuan Zhang, Jun Cheng, Weiguo Bian, Jia Li, Zhiwei Ren, Mengyuan Sun, Yin Yang, Dezhi Wang, Jing Ren
{"title":"Effect of lattice type on biomechanical and osseointegration properties of 3D-printed porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds","authors":"Jiantao Liu, Kao Wang, Runqing Wang, Zhanhai Yin, Xiaoling Zhou, Aofei Xu, Xiwei Zhang, Yiming Li, Ruiyan Wang, Shuyuan Zhang, Jun Cheng, Weiguo Bian, Jia Li, Zhiwei Ren, Mengyuan Sun, Yin Yang, Dezhi Wang, Jing Ren","doi":"10.36922/ijb.1698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Porous structure is an efficient tool for optimizing the elastic modulus and osseointegration properties of titanium alloy materials. However, the investigations on pore shape remain scarce. In this study, we created porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds with a pore size of 600 μm but different lattices (cubic pentagon, diamond, cuboctahedron). The mechanical and biological properties of the scaffolds were investigated in static simulation analysis, in vitro mechanical compression test, computational fluid dynamics, as well as cell and animal experiments. The results demonstrated that the calculated yield strength difference between the three Ti6Al4V porous scaffolds was negligible, at approximately 140 MPa, allowing them to match the strength requirements of human bones. The diamond scaffold has the lowest calculated elastic modulus (11.6 GPa), which is conducive for preventing stress shielding. The shear stress was largely concentrated in the diamond scaffold, and the stress range of 120–140 MPa accounted for the greatest share. The mouse MC3T3-E1 cells were found to attach to all three scaffolds, with the diamond scaffold displaying a higher degree of cell adherence. There was more proliferating cells on the diamond and cubic pentagon scaffolds than on the cuboctahedron scaffolds (P < 0.05). The diamond scaffold exhibited the highest alkaline phosphatase activity and calcium salt accumulation in cell differentiation tests. Besides, the expression of osteogenic genes on the diamond scaffold was higher than that on the cuboctahedron scaffold, the cubic pentagon scaffold displaying the lowest expression. The in vivo studies revealed that all three scaffolds fused well with the surrounding bone and that there was no loosening or movement of the prosthesis. Micro-computed tomography, corroborated by the staining results of hard tissues, revealed that the level of new bone formation was the highest in the diamond scaffold, followed by the cuboctahedron scaffold (P < 0.05). Taken together, the diamond scaffold is comparatively better at optimizing the elastic modulus and osseointegration properties of titanium alloy materials, and thus is a preferred choice for porous design.","PeriodicalId":48522,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Bioprinting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Bioprinting","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.1698","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Porous structure is an efficient tool for optimizing the elastic modulus and osseointegration properties of titanium alloy materials. However, the investigations on pore shape remain scarce. In this study, we created porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds with a pore size of 600 μm but different lattices (cubic pentagon, diamond, cuboctahedron). The mechanical and biological properties of the scaffolds were investigated in static simulation analysis, in vitro mechanical compression test, computational fluid dynamics, as well as cell and animal experiments. The results demonstrated that the calculated yield strength difference between the three Ti6Al4V porous scaffolds was negligible, at approximately 140 MPa, allowing them to match the strength requirements of human bones. The diamond scaffold has the lowest calculated elastic modulus (11.6 GPa), which is conducive for preventing stress shielding. The shear stress was largely concentrated in the diamond scaffold, and the stress range of 120–140 MPa accounted for the greatest share. The mouse MC3T3-E1 cells were found to attach to all three scaffolds, with the diamond scaffold displaying a higher degree of cell adherence. There was more proliferating cells on the diamond and cubic pentagon scaffolds than on the cuboctahedron scaffolds (P < 0.05). The diamond scaffold exhibited the highest alkaline phosphatase activity and calcium salt accumulation in cell differentiation tests. Besides, the expression of osteogenic genes on the diamond scaffold was higher than that on the cuboctahedron scaffold, the cubic pentagon scaffold displaying the lowest expression. The in vivo studies revealed that all three scaffolds fused well with the surrounding bone and that there was no loosening or movement of the prosthesis. Micro-computed tomography, corroborated by the staining results of hard tissues, revealed that the level of new bone formation was the highest in the diamond scaffold, followed by the cuboctahedron scaffold (P < 0.05). Taken together, the diamond scaffold is comparatively better at optimizing the elastic modulus and osseointegration properties of titanium alloy materials, and thus is a preferred choice for porous design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晶格类型对三维打印多孔 Ti6Al4V 支架的生物力学和骨整合特性的影响
多孔结构是优化钛合金材料弹性模量和骨结合性能的有效工具。然而,有关孔形状的研究仍然很少。在这项研究中,我们创建了孔径为 600 μm、具有不同晶格(立方五面体、菱形、立方八面体)的多孔 Ti6Al4V 支架。通过静态模拟分析、体外机械压缩试验、计算流体动力学以及细胞和动物实验,研究了支架的机械和生物特性。结果表明,三种 Ti6Al4V 多孔支架的计算屈服强度差异微乎其微,约为 140 兆帕,能够满足人体骨骼的强度要求。金刚石支架的计算弹性模量最低(11.6 GPa),有利于防止应力屏蔽。剪切应力主要集中在金刚石支架上,120-140 兆帕的应力范围所占比例最大。小鼠 MC3T3-E1 细胞在三种支架上都有附着,其中金刚石支架上的细胞附着程度更高。金刚石支架和立方五面体支架上的增殖细胞数量多于立方八面体支架(P < 0.05)。在细胞分化测试中,金刚石支架表现出最高的碱性磷酸酶活性和钙盐积累。此外,成骨基因在金刚石支架上的表达量高于在立方八面体支架上的表达量,而在立方五面体支架上的表达量最低。体内研究表明,三种支架都能与周围骨质很好地融合,假体没有松动或移动。显微计算机断层扫描和硬组织染色结果表明,金刚石支架的新骨形成水平最高,其次是长方体支架(P < 0.05)。综上所述,金刚石支架在优化钛合金材料的弹性模量和骨结合性能方面相对更佳,因此是多孔设计的首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Bioprinting is a globally recognized publication that focuses on the advancements, scientific discoveries, and practical implementations of Bioprinting. Bioprinting, in simple terms, involves the utilization of 3D printing technology and materials that contain living cells or biological components to fabricate tissues or other biotechnological products. Our journal encompasses interdisciplinary research that spans across technology, science, and clinical applications within the expansive realm of Bioprinting.
期刊最新文献
Methacrylic anhydride-assisted one-step in-situ extrusion 3D bioprinting of collagen hydrogels for enhanced full-thickness skin regeneration Advancements in 3D bioprinting for nanoparticle evaluation: Techniques, models, and biological applications Experimental and numerical approaches for optimizing conjunction area design to enhance switching efficiency in single-nozzle multi-ink bioprinting systems Osteocytic PGE2 receptors EP2/4 signaling create a physiological osteogenic microenvironment in polycaprolactone 3D module Design and fabrication of anisotropic SiO2 gyroid bioscaffolds with tunable properties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1