Evaluation of Breast Light Device Efficacy in Detection of Breast Lesions in Comparison with Breast Sono-Mammography

Mohamed Abdel-Latif, Hassan Elsoueni, Gamal Saleh, Ahmed Wahdan, amr rashed
{"title":"Evaluation of Breast Light Device Efficacy in Detection of Breast Lesions in Comparison with Breast Sono-Mammography","authors":"Mohamed Abdel-Latif, Hassan Elsoueni, Gamal Saleh, Ahmed Wahdan, amr rashed","doi":"10.21608/bmfj.2023.249907.1958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Breast cancer is a significant public health concern, and early detection of breast lesions is crucial for improved patient outcomes. Various screening methods, including mammography and ultrasound, have been employed, but their limitations necessitate the exploration of alternative diagnostic tools. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the Breast light device during clinical breast examination (CBE) in comparison of mammography and Breast ultrasound in the detection of breast lesions (BLs). Methods: This prospective multi-centric study was conducted, involving 300 female patients from outpatient breast clinics. The patients underwent clinical breast examination and were examined using the Breast Light device. Additionally, bilateral breast ultrasound or bilateral breast sono-mammography were performed. Results : The data showed that the Breast Light device exhibited a sensitivity of 72.6% and 83.8% for detecting benign and malignant breast masses when compared to ultrasound, with a specificity of 98.6% and an accuracy of 86.6%. When compared to sono-mammography, the sensitivity was 72.9% and 89.5%, with a specificity of 92.5% and an accuracy of 85.3%. Conclusion: The Breast Light device demonstrates promise as an adjunct tool for detecting breast lesions, with high specificity. It can play a valuable role in conjunction with traditional imaging methods, particularly in settings where advanced equipment may be limited.","PeriodicalId":503219,"journal":{"name":"Benha Medical Journal","volume":"31 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benha Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/bmfj.2023.249907.1958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer is a significant public health concern, and early detection of breast lesions is crucial for improved patient outcomes. Various screening methods, including mammography and ultrasound, have been employed, but their limitations necessitate the exploration of alternative diagnostic tools. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the Breast light device during clinical breast examination (CBE) in comparison of mammography and Breast ultrasound in the detection of breast lesions (BLs). Methods: This prospective multi-centric study was conducted, involving 300 female patients from outpatient breast clinics. The patients underwent clinical breast examination and were examined using the Breast Light device. Additionally, bilateral breast ultrasound or bilateral breast sono-mammography were performed. Results : The data showed that the Breast Light device exhibited a sensitivity of 72.6% and 83.8% for detecting benign and malignant breast masses when compared to ultrasound, with a specificity of 98.6% and an accuracy of 86.6%. When compared to sono-mammography, the sensitivity was 72.9% and 89.5%, with a specificity of 92.5% and an accuracy of 85.3%. Conclusion: The Breast Light device demonstrates promise as an adjunct tool for detecting breast lesions, with high specificity. It can play a valuable role in conjunction with traditional imaging methods, particularly in settings where advanced equipment may be limited.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估乳腺照明装置与乳腺声波乳房X光造影术在检测乳腺病变方面的功效比较
背景:乳腺癌是一个重大的公共卫生问题,早期发现乳腺病变对改善患者预后至关重要。目前已采用包括乳房 X 线照相术和超声波在内的各种筛查方法,但由于其局限性,有必要探索其他诊断工具。本研究旨在评估在临床乳房检查(CBE)过程中,乳腺灯装置与乳腺 X 线照相术和乳腺超声波在检测乳腺病变(BLs)方面的诊断效果比较。研究方法这项前瞻性多中心研究涉及乳腺门诊的 300 名女性患者。患者接受了临床乳房检查,并使用乳腺灯设备进行了检查。此外,还进行了双侧乳腺超声波检查或双侧乳腺超声乳腺造影检查。结果:数据显示,与超声波检查相比,乳腺灯设备检测乳腺良性和恶性肿块的灵敏度分别为 72.6% 和 83.8%,特异性为 98.6%,准确性为 86.6%。与超声乳腺造影相比,灵敏度分别为 72.9% 和 89.5%,特异性为 92.5%,准确性为 85.3%。结论乳腺灯设备作为检测乳腺病变的辅助工具,具有很高的特异性。它可以与传统成像方法结合使用,尤其是在先进设备有限的情况下,发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease on Health-Related Quality of Life Comparing Fair Control of Hyperglycemia contrary to Intensive Control in Patients after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Procedure Comparison of the Onset Time between 0.25% Bupivacaine and 0.5% Bupivacaine for Ultrasound‑Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized Clinical Trial Intramedullary Nailing Versus Minmally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) in Management of Distal Tibial Fractures Correlation between serum estrogen level and endometrial histology in cases of fibroid uterus in peri-menopausal peroid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1