Comparison of the Onset Time between 0.25% Bupivacaine and 0.5% Bupivacaine for Ultrasound‑Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized Clinical Trial

A. Elnoury, Y. Dabour, Mahmoud M Elnady
{"title":"Comparison of the Onset Time between 0.25% Bupivacaine and 0.5% Bupivacaine for Ultrasound‑Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized Clinical Trial","authors":"A. Elnoury, Y. Dabour, Mahmoud M Elnady","doi":"10.21608/bmfj.2024.279099.2050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Infraclavicular brachial plexus block is a suitable regional anaesthesia technique for hand, wrist and elbow operations and it is usually performed in conjunction with nerve stimulation. We aimed to compare the onset times of sensory block with equipotential 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine. Methods: This prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study was conducted on 60 patients, aged > 18 years, with ASA physical status I–III, and scheduled for upper extremity surgery with infraclavicular brachial plexus block. The participants were randomized into two equal groups; group I in which ICB performed with 0.25%, 20 mL bupivacaine and group II in which ICB performed with 0.5% 20 mL bupivacaine. Results: Regarding the block performance, group II showed earlier onset time and longer duration of sensory and motor blocks compared to group I (P<0.05) and the performance time was significantly shorter in in group II compared to group I (P=0.015). Number of patients required analgesia was significantly lower in group II compared to group I (P=0.003) was significantly lower in group II compared to group I (P=0.003) and the first rescue analgesic requirement was significantly delayed in group II compared to group I (P<0.001). Conclusions: We found that 0.5% bupivacaine showed earlier onset time and longer duration of sensory and motor blocks compared to 0.25% bupivacaine in infraclavicular block. Thus, when a quicker block onset is required, 0.5% bupivacaine is a better choice than 0.25% bupivacaine.","PeriodicalId":503219,"journal":{"name":"Benha Medical Journal","volume":"15 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benha Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/bmfj.2024.279099.2050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infraclavicular brachial plexus block is a suitable regional anaesthesia technique for hand, wrist and elbow operations and it is usually performed in conjunction with nerve stimulation. We aimed to compare the onset times of sensory block with equipotential 0.25% bupivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine. Methods: This prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study was conducted on 60 patients, aged > 18 years, with ASA physical status I–III, and scheduled for upper extremity surgery with infraclavicular brachial plexus block. The participants were randomized into two equal groups; group I in which ICB performed with 0.25%, 20 mL bupivacaine and group II in which ICB performed with 0.5% 20 mL bupivacaine. Results: Regarding the block performance, group II showed earlier onset time and longer duration of sensory and motor blocks compared to group I (P<0.05) and the performance time was significantly shorter in in group II compared to group I (P=0.015). Number of patients required analgesia was significantly lower in group II compared to group I (P=0.003) was significantly lower in group II compared to group I (P=0.003) and the first rescue analgesic requirement was significantly delayed in group II compared to group I (P<0.001). Conclusions: We found that 0.5% bupivacaine showed earlier onset time and longer duration of sensory and motor blocks compared to 0.25% bupivacaine in infraclavicular block. Thus, when a quicker block onset is required, 0.5% bupivacaine is a better choice than 0.25% bupivacaine.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞中 0.25% 布比卡因与 0.5% 布比卡因起效时间的比较:随机临床试验
背景:锁骨下臂丛阻滞是一种适用于手、腕和肘部手术的区域麻醉技术,通常与神经刺激同时进行。我们旨在比较等电位 0.25% 布比卡因和 0.5% 布比卡因感觉阻滞的起效时间。方法:这项前瞻性双盲随机对照研究的对象是 60 名年龄大于 18 岁、ASA 身体状况 I-III 级、计划接受锁骨下臂丛神经阻滞的上肢手术患者。参与者被随机分为两组,第一组使用 0.25% 20 mL 布比卡因进行 ICB,第二组使用 0.5% 20 mL 布比卡因进行 ICB。结果:在阻滞效果方面,与第一组相比,第二组的感觉和运动阻滞起始时间更早,持续时间更长(P<0.05),与第一组相比,第二组的阻滞时间明显更短(P=0.015)。与第一组相比,第二组需要镇痛的患者人数明显较少(P=0.003),与第一组相比,第二组需要镇痛的患者人数明显较少(P=0.003),与第一组相比,第二组首次需要镇痛的时间明显延迟(P<0.001)。结论我们发现,在锁骨下阻滞中,与 0.25% 布比卡因相比,0.5% 布比卡因起效时间更早,感觉和运动阻滞持续时间更长。因此,当需要更快的阻滞起效时间时,0.5% 布比卡因比 0.25% 布比卡因是更好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease on Health-Related Quality of Life Comparing Fair Control of Hyperglycemia contrary to Intensive Control in Patients after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Procedure Comparison of the Onset Time between 0.25% Bupivacaine and 0.5% Bupivacaine for Ultrasound‑Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized Clinical Trial Intramedullary Nailing Versus Minmally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) in Management of Distal Tibial Fractures Correlation between serum estrogen level and endometrial histology in cases of fibroid uterus in peri-menopausal peroid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1