Integrated Four-Wheel Steering and Direct Yaw-Moment Control for Autonomous Collision Avoidance on Curved Road

IF 0.6 Q4 TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY SAE International Journal of Commercial Vehicles Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI:10.4271/02-17-01-0007
Fei Lai
{"title":"Integrated Four-Wheel Steering and Direct Yaw-Moment Control for\n Autonomous Collision Avoidance on Curved Road","authors":"Fei Lai","doi":"10.4271/02-17-01-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An automatic collision avoidance control method integrating optimal four-wheel\n steering (4WS) and direct yaw-moment control (DYC) for autonomous vehicles on\n curved road is proposed in this study. Optimal four-wheel steering is used to\n track a predetermined trajectory, and DYC is adopted for vehicle stability. Two\n single lane change collision avoidance scenarios, i.e., a stationary obstacle in\n front and a moving obstacle at a lower speed in the same lane, are constructed\n to verify the proposed control method. The main contributions of this article\n include (1) a quintic polynomial lane change trajectory for collision avoidance\n on curved road is proposed and (2) four different kinds of control method for\n autonomous collision avoidance, namely 2WS, 2WS+DYC, 4WS, and 4WS+DYC, are\n compared. In the design of DYC controller, two different feedback control\n methods are adopted for comparison, i.e., sideslip angle feedback and yaw rate\n feedback. The simulation results demonstrate significant improvements in the\n path tracking performance and stability of the 4WS+DYC control system compared\n to other control systems. Furthermore, the performance of the DYC control system\n with yaw rate feedback outperforms that of the DYC control system with sideslip\n angle feedback.","PeriodicalId":45281,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Commercial Vehicles","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Commercial Vehicles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/02-17-01-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An automatic collision avoidance control method integrating optimal four-wheel steering (4WS) and direct yaw-moment control (DYC) for autonomous vehicles on curved road is proposed in this study. Optimal four-wheel steering is used to track a predetermined trajectory, and DYC is adopted for vehicle stability. Two single lane change collision avoidance scenarios, i.e., a stationary obstacle in front and a moving obstacle at a lower speed in the same lane, are constructed to verify the proposed control method. The main contributions of this article include (1) a quintic polynomial lane change trajectory for collision avoidance on curved road is proposed and (2) four different kinds of control method for autonomous collision avoidance, namely 2WS, 2WS+DYC, 4WS, and 4WS+DYC, are compared. In the design of DYC controller, two different feedback control methods are adopted for comparison, i.e., sideslip angle feedback and yaw rate feedback. The simulation results demonstrate significant improvements in the path tracking performance and stability of the 4WS+DYC control system compared to other control systems. Furthermore, the performance of the DYC control system with yaw rate feedback outperforms that of the DYC control system with sideslip angle feedback.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
集成四轮转向和直接偏航力矩控制,实现弯道上的自主避撞
本研究提出了一种自动避撞控制方法,该方法集成了最优四轮转向(4WS)和直接偏航时刻控制(DYC),适用于曲线道路上的自动驾驶车辆。优化四轮转向用于跟踪预定轨迹,而直接偏航力矩控制用于保证车辆稳定性。为了验证所提出的控制方法,构建了两个单一的变道防撞场景,即前方有静止障碍物和同一车道上有速度较低的移动障碍物。本文的主要贡献包括:(1) 提出了曲线道路防撞的五次多项式变道轨迹;(2) 比较了四种不同的自主防撞控制方法,即 2WS、2WS+DYC、4WS 和 4WS+DYC。在设计 DYC 控制器时,比较采用了两种不同的反馈控制方法,即侧滑角反馈和偏航率反馈。仿真结果表明,与其他控制系统相比,4WS+DYC 控制系统在路径跟踪性能和稳定性方面有明显改善。此外,采用偏航率反馈的 DYC 控制系统的性能优于采用侧倾角反馈的 DYC 控制系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SAE International Journal of Commercial Vehicles
SAE International Journal of Commercial Vehicles TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Propulsion Electrification Architecture Selection Process and Cost of Carbon Abatement Analysis for Heavy-Duty Off-Road Material Handler Technical Study for the Development of Air Brake Compressor in Electric Commercial Vehicles Fuel Efficiency Analysis and Control of a Series Electric Hybrid Compact Wheel Loader Integrated Four-Wheel Steering and Direct Yaw-Moment Control for Autonomous Collision Avoidance on Curved Road Methodical Design of a Subframe for a Novel Modular Chassis Concept without Knowledge of Final Vehicle Parameters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1