Bryant Goodenough, Alexander Czarnecki, Darrell Robinette, Jeremy Worm, Brian Burroughs, Phil Latendresse, John Westman
{"title":"Propulsion Electrification Architecture Selection Process and Cost of\n Carbon Abatement Analysis for Heavy-Duty Off-Road Material\n Handler","authors":"Bryant Goodenough, Alexander Czarnecki, Darrell Robinette, Jeremy Worm, Brian Burroughs, Phil Latendresse, John Westman","doi":"10.4271/02-17-03-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The heavy-duty off-road industry continues to expand efforts to reduce fuel\n consumption and CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalent) emissions. Many\n manufacturers are pursuing electrification to decrease fuel consumption and\n emissions. Future policies will likely require electrification for\n CO2e savings, as seen in light-duty on-road vehicles. Electrified\n architectures vary widely in the heavy-duty off-road space, with parallel\n hybrids in some applications and series hybrids in others. The diverse\n applications for different types of equipment mean different electrified\n configurations are required. Companies must also determine the value in pursuing\n electrified architectures; this work analyzes a range of electrified\n architectures, from micro hybrids to parallel hybrids to series hybrids to a\n BEV, looking at the total cost, total CO2e, and cost per\n CO2e (cost of carbon abatement, or cost of carbon reduction)\n using data for the year 2021. This study is focused on a heavy-duty off-road\n material handler, the Pettibone Cary-Lift 204i. This machine’s specialty\n application, including events like unloading large oil pipes from a railcar,\n requires a unique electrified architecture that suits its specific needs.\n However, the results from this study may be extrapolated to similar machinery to\n inform fuel savings options across the heavy-duty off-road industry. In this\n study, a unique electrified architecture is determined for the Cary-Lift. This\n architecture is informed by multiple rounds of a Pugh matrix decision analysis\n to select a shortened list of desirable electrified architectures. The shortened\n list is modeled and simulated to determine CO2e, cost, and cost per\n CO2e. A final architecture is determined as a plug-in series\n hybrid that reduces fuel consumption by 65%, targeting the large fuel and\n CO2e savings that are likely to be required for the future of the\n heavy-duty off-road industry.","PeriodicalId":45281,"journal":{"name":"SAE International Journal of Commercial Vehicles","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAE International Journal of Commercial Vehicles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/02-17-03-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The heavy-duty off-road industry continues to expand efforts to reduce fuel
consumption and CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalent) emissions. Many
manufacturers are pursuing electrification to decrease fuel consumption and
emissions. Future policies will likely require electrification for
CO2e savings, as seen in light-duty on-road vehicles. Electrified
architectures vary widely in the heavy-duty off-road space, with parallel
hybrids in some applications and series hybrids in others. The diverse
applications for different types of equipment mean different electrified
configurations are required. Companies must also determine the value in pursuing
electrified architectures; this work analyzes a range of electrified
architectures, from micro hybrids to parallel hybrids to series hybrids to a
BEV, looking at the total cost, total CO2e, and cost per
CO2e (cost of carbon abatement, or cost of carbon reduction)
using data for the year 2021. This study is focused on a heavy-duty off-road
material handler, the Pettibone Cary-Lift 204i. This machine’s specialty
application, including events like unloading large oil pipes from a railcar,
requires a unique electrified architecture that suits its specific needs.
However, the results from this study may be extrapolated to similar machinery to
inform fuel savings options across the heavy-duty off-road industry. In this
study, a unique electrified architecture is determined for the Cary-Lift. This
architecture is informed by multiple rounds of a Pugh matrix decision analysis
to select a shortened list of desirable electrified architectures. The shortened
list is modeled and simulated to determine CO2e, cost, and cost per
CO2e. A final architecture is determined as a plug-in series
hybrid that reduces fuel consumption by 65%, targeting the large fuel and
CO2e savings that are likely to be required for the future of the
heavy-duty off-road industry.