Exploring social-ecological system resilience in South China Karst: Quantification, interaction and policy implication

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL Geography and Sustainability Pub Date : 2024-01-26 DOI:10.1016/j.geosus.2024.01.003
Tiantian Chen , Yuxi Wang , Li Peng
{"title":"Exploring social-ecological system resilience in South China Karst: Quantification, interaction and policy implication","authors":"Tiantian Chen ,&nbsp;Yuxi Wang ,&nbsp;Li Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.geosus.2024.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>China’s Grain to Green Program (GTGP), which is one of the largest payments for ecosystem services (PES) in the world, has made significant ecological improvements to the environment. However, current understanding of its outcomes on the social-ecological system (SES) remains limited. Therefore, taking the South China Karst as an example, a SES resilience evaluation index system was constructed followed by an exploratory spatial analysis, root mean square error, and Self-Organizing Feature Map to clarify the spatiotemporal changes and relationship of SES resilience, achieve the zoning of SES resilience and provide restoration measures. The results showed an upward trend in social resilience from 2000 to 2020, especially its subsystem of social development. Regional ecological resilience was stable, owing to a slightly declined ecosystem services and increased landscape pattern. Spatially, nearly half of the counties exhibited a distribution mismatch in SES resilience. There was an obvious inverted U-shaped relationship of SES resilience, indicating a clear threshold effect, and the constraint relationship of SES resilience eased over time, demonstrating the effectiveness of the ecological restoration program. GTGP played a positive role in reducing regional SES trade-off, but this positive effect was limited, reflecting the limitations of overemphasizing the conversion from farmland to forest and grassland. Regional SES resilience can be divided into four clusters, which were the key optimization zone for social system, the SES resilience safety zone, the key restoration zone for SES resilience, and the key optimization zone for ecological system. Adaptive adjustments for the GTGP in these zones should be taken to achieve maximum SES benefits in the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52374,"journal":{"name":"Geography and Sustainability","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 289-301"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683924000038/pdfft?md5=4951b901d5b9ad4777ff890e2611126a&pid=1-s2.0-S2666683924000038-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666683924000038","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China’s Grain to Green Program (GTGP), which is one of the largest payments for ecosystem services (PES) in the world, has made significant ecological improvements to the environment. However, current understanding of its outcomes on the social-ecological system (SES) remains limited. Therefore, taking the South China Karst as an example, a SES resilience evaluation index system was constructed followed by an exploratory spatial analysis, root mean square error, and Self-Organizing Feature Map to clarify the spatiotemporal changes and relationship of SES resilience, achieve the zoning of SES resilience and provide restoration measures. The results showed an upward trend in social resilience from 2000 to 2020, especially its subsystem of social development. Regional ecological resilience was stable, owing to a slightly declined ecosystem services and increased landscape pattern. Spatially, nearly half of the counties exhibited a distribution mismatch in SES resilience. There was an obvious inverted U-shaped relationship of SES resilience, indicating a clear threshold effect, and the constraint relationship of SES resilience eased over time, demonstrating the effectiveness of the ecological restoration program. GTGP played a positive role in reducing regional SES trade-off, but this positive effect was limited, reflecting the limitations of overemphasizing the conversion from farmland to forest and grassland. Regional SES resilience can be divided into four clusters, which were the key optimization zone for social system, the SES resilience safety zone, the key restoration zone for SES resilience, and the key optimization zone for ecological system. Adaptive adjustments for the GTGP in these zones should be taken to achieve maximum SES benefits in the future.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索华南喀斯特的社会生态系统复原力:量化、互动与政策含义
中国的 "粮改绿 "项目(GTGP)是世界上最大的生态系统服务补偿项目(PES)之一,为环境带来了显著的生态改善。然而,目前对该计划对社会生态系统(SES)所产生影响的了解仍然有限。因此,以华南喀斯特为例,通过探索性空间分析、均方根误差和自组织特征图,构建了社会生态系统恢复力评价指标体系,以阐明社会生态系统恢复力的时空变化及其关系,实现社会生态系统恢复力的分区,并提供恢复措施。结果表明,从 2000 年到 2020 年,社会韧性呈上升趋势,尤其是社会发展子系统。区域生态复原力保持稳定,原因是生态系统服务略有下降,景观格局有所扩大。从空间上看,近一半的县在生态系统服务复原力方面表现出分布不匹配。生态系统服务恢复力呈明显的倒 U 型关系,显示出明显的门槛效应,并且生态系统服务恢复力的约束关系随着时间的推移而缓解,显示出生态恢复计划的有效性。GTGP在减少区域SES权衡方面发挥了积极作用,但这种积极作用是有限的,反映了过分强调农田向森林和草地转化的局限性。区域 SES 复原力可分为四个集群,即社会系统关键优化区、SES 复原力安全区、SES 复原力关键恢复区和生态系统关键优化区。应在这些区域对 GTGP 进行适应性调整,以实现未来 SES 效益的最大化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geography and Sustainability
Geography and Sustainability Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
16.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
32
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Geography and Sustainability serves as a central hub for interdisciplinary research and education aimed at promoting sustainable development from an integrated geography perspective. By bridging natural and human sciences, the journal fosters broader analysis and innovative thinking on global and regional sustainability issues. Geography and Sustainability welcomes original, high-quality research articles, review articles, short communications, technical comments, perspective articles and editorials on the following themes: Geographical Processes: Interactions with and between water, soil, atmosphere and the biosphere and their spatio-temporal variations; Human-Environmental Systems: Interactions between humans and the environment, resilience of socio-ecological systems and vulnerability; Ecosystem Services and Human Wellbeing: Ecosystem structure, processes, services and their linkages with human wellbeing; Sustainable Development: Theory, practice and critical challenges in sustainable development.
期刊最新文献
Long-term stability in protected-areas? A vision from American/New World amphibians Latitudinal gradients of biodiversity and ecosystem services in protected and non-protected oak forest areas can inform climate smart conservation Global sustainable agriculture and land management systems Evolution and customisation of the RegCM model for urban climate studies: Addressing multifaceted challenges and advancing climate science Ecosystem services potential and soil conservation policies with emphasis on degraded pastures in Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1