SUBJECT: REVIEW METHODS OF DETECTING SUGAR IN A SAMPLE

Inas Hasan AL-Khafaj
{"title":"SUBJECT: REVIEW METHODS OF DETECTING SUGAR IN A SAMPLE","authors":"Inas Hasan AL-Khafaj","doi":"10.37547/tajiir/volume06issue01-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The sugar is a simple type of carbohydrate and represents the main source of energy to power the biological and physical activities in the body. However, it has been reported that over weight gain, imperfect metabolic processes and heart diseases are mainly related to excess sugar intake, which causes diabetic complains. This has raised the demand of having reliable test methods for quantifying sugar amount in different samples to both monitor sugar levels and to study the biological effects of carbohydrates. This provides valuable information in various fields, including food science, biochemistry, and medicine. Several test methods have been applied to detect the presence of sugar in a biological sample. Conventional tests imply using special chemical reagents. Two well known tests are discussed briefly in this report, namely Molich’s and Fehling's tests. The chemical reagents, test procedures, precaution as well as advantages and limitations were comprehensively discussed. A comparison between the two tests has been thoroughly addressed.","PeriodicalId":22348,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37547/tajiir/volume06issue01-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The sugar is a simple type of carbohydrate and represents the main source of energy to power the biological and physical activities in the body. However, it has been reported that over weight gain, imperfect metabolic processes and heart diseases are mainly related to excess sugar intake, which causes diabetic complains. This has raised the demand of having reliable test methods for quantifying sugar amount in different samples to both monitor sugar levels and to study the biological effects of carbohydrates. This provides valuable information in various fields, including food science, biochemistry, and medicine. Several test methods have been applied to detect the presence of sugar in a biological sample. Conventional tests imply using special chemical reagents. Two well known tests are discussed briefly in this report, namely Molich’s and Fehling's tests. The chemical reagents, test procedures, precaution as well as advantages and limitations were comprehensively discussed. A comparison between the two tests has been thoroughly addressed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主题:审查检测样品中糖的方法
糖是一种简单的碳水化合物,是人体生物和物理活动的主要能量来源。然而,据报道,体重增加过多、新陈代谢过程不完善和心脏病主要与摄入过多的糖有关,从而引起糖尿病患者的抱怨。这就要求有可靠的检测方法来量化不同样本中的糖分含量,以监测糖分水平和研究碳水化合物的生物效应。这为食品科学、生物化学和医学等各个领域提供了宝贵的信息。有几种检测方法可用于检测生物样本中糖的存在。传统的检测方法需要使用特殊的化学试剂。本报告将简要讨论两种众所周知的检测方法,即莫利希检测法和费林检测法。报告全面讨论了化学试剂、测试程序、注意事项以及优点和局限性。报告还对这两种试验进行了全面的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ECOLOGIZATION OF GEOGRAPHY AND SOME THEORETICAL ASPECTS OF GEOECOLOGY INNOVATIVE APPROACHES THROUGH INTERFAITH DIALOGUE FOR RESOLVING FARMERS-HERDERS DISPUTES IN SOUTHWEST NIGERIA’S SELECTED COMMUNITIES DEVELOPMENT OF SANOGENIC THINKING OF PRIMARY CLASS STUDENTS IN THE CONDITIONS OF DIGITALTRANSFORMATION SOME ASPECTS IN IMPROVING SELF-DEVELOPMENT COMPETENCIES OF FUTURE PRIMARY CLASS TEACHERS THE IMPORTANCE OF WORK ON SELF-DEVELOPMENT IN ACQUISITION OF PROFESSIONAL-ACMEOLOGICAL COMPETENCE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1