Long-Term Orbito-Ocular Outcomes following Le Fort III and Monobloc Distraction Osteogenesis in Patients with Syndromic Craniosynostosis.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Plastic and reconstructive surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000011354
Matthew E Pontell, Connor S Wagner, Neil Reddy, Lauren K Salinero, Carlos E Barrero, Jordan W Swanson, Scott P Bartlett, Jesse A Taylor
{"title":"Long-Term Orbito-Ocular Outcomes following Le Fort III and Monobloc Distraction Osteogenesis in Patients with Syndromic Craniosynostosis.","authors":"Matthew E Pontell, Connor S Wagner, Neil Reddy, Lauren K Salinero, Carlos E Barrero, Jordan W Swanson, Scott P Bartlett, Jesse A Taylor","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exorbitism in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis is often managed by Le Fort III (LF3) or monobloc (MB) distraction osteogenesis (DO). This study compared short- and long-term orbital craniometrics after LF3DO/MBDO and related these findings to symptom relief.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing LF3DO or MBDO from 2000 to 2021 with preoperative and postoperative imaging were included. Postoperative computed tomographic (CT) scans were categorized as early (<1 year) or late (>1 year), and age-matched control CT scans were compared with late postoperative scans. Superoinferior orbital rim position, relative globe position, and orbital volume were analyzed. Symptoms were assessed by a patient-reported outcome analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four patients (LF3DO, n = 16; MBDO, n = 18) were matched by age at surgery, sex, syndrome, and age at imaging. Time to late CT scan was 6.2 years (LF3DO) and 7.5 years (MBDO). Between early and late postoperative time points, LF3DO patients experienced no change in inferior rim position. MBDO patients experienced a decrease in inferior orbital rim position of 4.7 mm ( P = 0.005), but superior orbital rim distance remained stable. Comparison of late scans and age-matched controls revealed no difference in inferior or superior orbital rim position in LF3DO patients, but the superior orbital rim distance was longer in MBDO patients ( P = 0.015). Patient-reported outcome response rate was 76% with a median follow-up of 13.7 years. Most (81%) symptomatic patients improved, 19% remained symptomatic, and no patients worsened.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LF3DO and MBDO achieved stable orbital craniometric changes, with improved stability at the inferior orbital rim after LF3DO. Craniometric changes were associated with long-term exorbitism symptom relief.</p><p><strong>Clinical question/level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic, III.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"523-533"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11845072/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011354","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exorbitism in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis is often managed by Le Fort III (LF3) or monobloc (MB) distraction osteogenesis (DO). This study compared short- and long-term orbital craniometrics after LF3DO/MBDO and related these findings to symptom relief.

Methods: Patients undergoing LF3DO or MBDO from 2000 to 2021 with preoperative and postoperative imaging were included. Postoperative computed tomographic (CT) scans were categorized as early (<1 year) or late (>1 year), and age-matched control CT scans were compared with late postoperative scans. Superoinferior orbital rim position, relative globe position, and orbital volume were analyzed. Symptoms were assessed by a patient-reported outcome analysis.

Results: Thirty-four patients (LF3DO, n = 16; MBDO, n = 18) were matched by age at surgery, sex, syndrome, and age at imaging. Time to late CT scan was 6.2 years (LF3DO) and 7.5 years (MBDO). Between early and late postoperative time points, LF3DO patients experienced no change in inferior rim position. MBDO patients experienced a decrease in inferior orbital rim position of 4.7 mm ( P = 0.005), but superior orbital rim distance remained stable. Comparison of late scans and age-matched controls revealed no difference in inferior or superior orbital rim position in LF3DO patients, but the superior orbital rim distance was longer in MBDO patients ( P = 0.015). Patient-reported outcome response rate was 76% with a median follow-up of 13.7 years. Most (81%) symptomatic patients improved, 19% remained symptomatic, and no patients worsened.

Conclusions: LF3DO and MBDO achieved stable orbital craniometric changes, with improved stability at the inferior orbital rim after LF3DO. Craniometric changes were associated with long-term exorbitism symptom relief.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, III.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综合征颅畸形患者接受 LeFort III 和单体牵引成骨术后的长期眼眶疗效。
简介:综合征颅骨发育不良患者的外翻通常通过LeFort III (LF3)或Monobloc (MB)牵张成骨术(DO)进行治疗。本研究比较了 LF3DO/MBDO 术后的短期和长期眶颅测量结果,并将这些结果与症状缓解情况联系起来:方法:纳入2000-2021年期间接受LF3DO或MBDO手术的患者,并进行术前和术后成像。术后 CT 被归类为早期(1 年),年龄匹配的对照 CT 与术后晚期扫描进行比较。对眼眶上缘/下缘位置、相对球体位置和眼眶体积进行了分析。症状通过患者报告结果(PRO)分析进行评估:34名患者(16名LF3DO患者,18名MBDO患者)的手术年龄、性别、综合征和造影年龄相匹配。晚期 CT 的时间为 6.2 年(LF3DO)和 7.5 年(MBDO)。在术后早期和晚期时间点之间,LF3DO 患者的下缘位置没有变化。MBDO 患者的眶下缘位置下降了 4.7 毫米(P=0.005),但眶上缘距离保持稳定。对比晚期扫描和年龄匹配的对照组发现,LF3DO 患者的眶下缘或眶上缘位置没有差异,但 MBDO 患者的眶上缘距离更长(p=0.015)。PRO反应率为76%,中位随访时间为13.7年。大多数(81%)有症状的患者病情有所改善,19%的患者仍有症状,没有患者病情恶化:结论:LF3DO 和 MBDO 实现了稳定的眶颅测量变化,LF3DO 后眶下缘的稳定性有所提高。颅测量的变化与长期的外斜症状缓解有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
期刊最新文献
Long-Term Orbito-Ocular Outcomes following Le Fort III and Monobloc Distraction Osteogenesis in Patients with Syndromic Craniosynostosis. Trends in Blood Mosaicism and Clinical Phenotype Score in Patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome Evaluated for Tongue Reduction Surgery. A National Analysis of Targeted Muscle Reinnervation following Major Upper Extremity Amputation. Preventing Hump Recurrence in Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: The 5 Key Tenets. P Value Reporting and Reliability in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Primer for Readers and Investigators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1