A National Analysis of Targeted Muscle Reinnervation following Major Upper Extremity Amputation.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Plastic and reconstructive surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-29 DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000011439
Lauren Valentine, Allan A Weidman, Jose Foppiani, Angelica Hernandez Alvarez, Erin Kim, Natalie E Hassell, Nicholas Elmer, Toni F Engmann, Samuel J Lin, Sammy Dowlatshahi
{"title":"A National Analysis of Targeted Muscle Reinnervation following Major Upper Extremity Amputation.","authors":"Lauren Valentine, Allan A Weidman, Jose Foppiani, Angelica Hernandez Alvarez, Erin Kim, Natalie E Hassell, Nicholas Elmer, Toni F Engmann, Samuel J Lin, Sammy Dowlatshahi","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postamputation pain is a debilitating sequela of upper extremity (UE) amputation. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a relatively novel treatment that can help prevent pain and improve quality of life. The purpose of this study was to evaluate national trends in the application of immediate TMR following UE amputations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was conducted from 2016 to 2019. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, codes were used to identify encounters involving UE amputation with and without TMR. Nationwide Inpatient Sample weights were used to estimate national estimates of incidence. Patient-specific and hospital-specific factors were analyzed to assess associations with use of TMR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8945 weighted encounters underwent UE amputation, and of those, only 310 (3.5%) received TMR. The majority of TMR occurred in urban hospitals (>95%). Younger patients (47 years versus 54 years; P = 0.008) and patients located in New England were significantly more likely to undergo TMR. There was no difference in total cost of hospitalization among patients who underwent TMR ($55,241.0 versus $59,027.8; P = 0.683) but significantly shorter lengths of hospital stay when undergoing TMR versus other management (10.6 days versus 14.8 days; P = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TMR has purported benefits of pain reduction, neuroma prevention, and increased prosthetic control. Access to this beneficial procedure following UE amputation varies by demographics and geographic region. Given that TMR has not been shown to increase cost while simultaneously decreasing patient length of stay, increased efforts to incorporate this procedure into training and practice will help to ensure equitable care for amputation patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"566-573"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011439","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postamputation pain is a debilitating sequela of upper extremity (UE) amputation. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a relatively novel treatment that can help prevent pain and improve quality of life. The purpose of this study was to evaluate national trends in the application of immediate TMR following UE amputations.

Methods: An analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was conducted from 2016 to 2019. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, codes were used to identify encounters involving UE amputation with and without TMR. Nationwide Inpatient Sample weights were used to estimate national estimates of incidence. Patient-specific and hospital-specific factors were analyzed to assess associations with use of TMR.

Results: A total of 8945 weighted encounters underwent UE amputation, and of those, only 310 (3.5%) received TMR. The majority of TMR occurred in urban hospitals (>95%). Younger patients (47 years versus 54 years; P = 0.008) and patients located in New England were significantly more likely to undergo TMR. There was no difference in total cost of hospitalization among patients who underwent TMR ($55,241.0 versus $59,027.8; P = 0.683) but significantly shorter lengths of hospital stay when undergoing TMR versus other management (10.6 days versus 14.8 days; P = 0.012).

Conclusions: TMR has purported benefits of pain reduction, neuroma prevention, and increased prosthetic control. Access to this beneficial procedure following UE amputation varies by demographics and geographic region. Given that TMR has not been shown to increase cost while simultaneously decreasing patient length of stay, increased efforts to incorporate this procedure into training and practice will help to ensure equitable care for amputation patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上肢大截肢后靶向肌肉再神经支配的全国性分析。
背景:截肢后疼痛是上肢(UE)截肢后的一种使人衰弱的后遗症。靶向肌肉神经支配(TMR)是一种相对新颖的治疗方法,有助于预防疼痛和提高生活质量。本研究的目的是评估上肢截肢后立即应用 TMR 的全国趋势。.方法:对 2016-2019 年全国住院患者样本数据库进行了分析。使用 ICD-10 编码识别涉及 UE 截肢并进行和未进行 TMR 的病例。使用 NIS 权重估算全国发病率估计数。分析了患者特异性和医院特异性因素,以评估与使用TMR的关联:结果:共有 8,945 例加权病例接受了 UE 截肢手术,其中只有 310 例(3.5%)接受了 TMR。大多数 TMR 发生在城市医院(>95%)。年轻患者(47 岁对 54 岁,P=0.008)和新英格兰地区的患者接受 TMR 的几率明显更高。接受TMR的患者住院总费用没有差异(55241美元 vs 59027.8美元,P=0.683),但接受TMR的患者住院时间明显短于接受其他治疗的患者(10.6 vs 14.8,P=0.012):TMR据称具有减轻疼痛、预防神经瘤和增强假体控制的功效。不同的人口和地理区域在截肢后获得这种有益手术的机会也不尽相同。鉴于 TMR 在减少患者住院时间的同时并未增加成本,因此加大力度将该手术纳入培训和实践将有助于确保截肢患者得到公平的护理。.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
期刊最新文献
Long-Term Orbito-Ocular Outcomes following Le Fort III and Monobloc Distraction Osteogenesis in Patients with Syndromic Craniosynostosis. Trends in Blood Mosaicism and Clinical Phenotype Score in Patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome Evaluated for Tongue Reduction Surgery. A National Analysis of Targeted Muscle Reinnervation following Major Upper Extremity Amputation. Preventing Hump Recurrence in Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: The 5 Key Tenets. P Value Reporting and Reliability in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Primer for Readers and Investigators.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1