Lauren Valentine, Allan A Weidman, Jose Foppiani, Angelica Hernandez Alvarez, Erin Kim, Natalie E Hassell, Nicholas Elmer, Toni F Engmann, Samuel J Lin, Sammy Dowlatshahi
{"title":"A National Analysis of Targeted Muscle Reinnervation following Major Upper Extremity Amputation.","authors":"Lauren Valentine, Allan A Weidman, Jose Foppiani, Angelica Hernandez Alvarez, Erin Kim, Natalie E Hassell, Nicholas Elmer, Toni F Engmann, Samuel J Lin, Sammy Dowlatshahi","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postamputation pain is a debilitating sequela of upper extremity (UE) amputation. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a relatively novel treatment that can help prevent pain and improve quality of life. The purpose of this study was to evaluate national trends in the application of immediate TMR following UE amputations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was conducted from 2016 to 2019. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, codes were used to identify encounters involving UE amputation with and without TMR. Nationwide Inpatient Sample weights were used to estimate national estimates of incidence. Patient-specific and hospital-specific factors were analyzed to assess associations with use of TMR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8945 weighted encounters underwent UE amputation, and of those, only 310 (3.5%) received TMR. The majority of TMR occurred in urban hospitals (>95%). Younger patients (47 years versus 54 years; P = 0.008) and patients located in New England were significantly more likely to undergo TMR. There was no difference in total cost of hospitalization among patients who underwent TMR ($55,241.0 versus $59,027.8; P = 0.683) but significantly shorter lengths of hospital stay when undergoing TMR versus other management (10.6 days versus 14.8 days; P = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TMR has purported benefits of pain reduction, neuroma prevention, and increased prosthetic control. Access to this beneficial procedure following UE amputation varies by demographics and geographic region. Given that TMR has not been shown to increase cost while simultaneously decreasing patient length of stay, increased efforts to incorporate this procedure into training and practice will help to ensure equitable care for amputation patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"566-573"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011439","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Postamputation pain is a debilitating sequela of upper extremity (UE) amputation. Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a relatively novel treatment that can help prevent pain and improve quality of life. The purpose of this study was to evaluate national trends in the application of immediate TMR following UE amputations.
Methods: An analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was conducted from 2016 to 2019. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, codes were used to identify encounters involving UE amputation with and without TMR. Nationwide Inpatient Sample weights were used to estimate national estimates of incidence. Patient-specific and hospital-specific factors were analyzed to assess associations with use of TMR.
Results: A total of 8945 weighted encounters underwent UE amputation, and of those, only 310 (3.5%) received TMR. The majority of TMR occurred in urban hospitals (>95%). Younger patients (47 years versus 54 years; P = 0.008) and patients located in New England were significantly more likely to undergo TMR. There was no difference in total cost of hospitalization among patients who underwent TMR ($55,241.0 versus $59,027.8; P = 0.683) but significantly shorter lengths of hospital stay when undergoing TMR versus other management (10.6 days versus 14.8 days; P = 0.012).
Conclusions: TMR has purported benefits of pain reduction, neuroma prevention, and increased prosthetic control. Access to this beneficial procedure following UE amputation varies by demographics and geographic region. Given that TMR has not been shown to increase cost while simultaneously decreasing patient length of stay, increased efforts to incorporate this procedure into training and practice will help to ensure equitable care for amputation patients.
期刊介绍:
For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.