Adoption of electronic patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical practice: the point of view of Italian patients

A.A. Valsecchi , V. Battista , S. Terzolo , R. Dionisio , G. Lacidogna , D. Marino , V. Quarà , E. Sperti , V. Tuninetti , F. Vignani , C. Zichi , V.E. Bounous , G. Valabrega , A. Ferrero , N. Biglia , M. Di Maio
{"title":"Adoption of electronic patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical practice: the point of view of Italian patients","authors":"A.A. Valsecchi ,&nbsp;V. Battista ,&nbsp;S. Terzolo ,&nbsp;R. Dionisio ,&nbsp;G. Lacidogna ,&nbsp;D. Marino ,&nbsp;V. Quarà ,&nbsp;E. Sperti ,&nbsp;V. Tuninetti ,&nbsp;F. Vignani ,&nbsp;C. Zichi ,&nbsp;V.E. Bounous ,&nbsp;G. Valabrega ,&nbsp;A. Ferrero ,&nbsp;N. Biglia ,&nbsp;M. Di Maio","doi":"10.1016/j.esmorw.2024.100025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In 2022, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guideline recommended the adoption of electronic patient-reported outcomes measures (ePROMs) in routine clinical practice for patients with cancer. The aim of this survey is to identify the critical issues that would arise in the implementation of ePROMs in daily oncology clinical practice from patients’ view.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>From March to April 2023, outpatients with cancer treated at Mauriziano Hospital in Turin (Italy) filled in a paper questionnaire. Seven questions dealt with the respondents’ characteristics, eight questions with the satisfaction about the current method used to collect information about patients’ symptoms and toxicities, and the opinion about several potentially critical issues for the implementation of ePROMs.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Two hundred and twenty patients completed the survey. In current clinical practice, symptoms are mostly collected through verbal questions and paper-based questionnaires. Seventy-two percent of patients were satisfied with these methods; 82% were in favor of using ePROMs. Most patients were not concerned about privacy (82%), while a minority was concerned about possible lack of interest by clinicians in the symptoms digitally reported (14%) and the possible negative impact on doctor–patient relationship (39%). Seventy-seven percent of respondents declared to be familiar with technological tools and 83% were confident with the availability of internet connection.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In our center, most patients are satisfied with current methods of symptom monitoring and would also be in favor of the introduction of ePROMs. However, several aspects still need to be addressed for universal implementation of ePROMs in routine practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100491,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100025"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820124000031/pdfft?md5=9768c2c7b02d2dfd57d69b12d6200db6&pid=1-s2.0-S2949820124000031-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820124000031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In 2022, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) guideline recommended the adoption of electronic patient-reported outcomes measures (ePROMs) in routine clinical practice for patients with cancer. The aim of this survey is to identify the critical issues that would arise in the implementation of ePROMs in daily oncology clinical practice from patients’ view.

Materials and methods

From March to April 2023, outpatients with cancer treated at Mauriziano Hospital in Turin (Italy) filled in a paper questionnaire. Seven questions dealt with the respondents’ characteristics, eight questions with the satisfaction about the current method used to collect information about patients’ symptoms and toxicities, and the opinion about several potentially critical issues for the implementation of ePROMs.

Results

Two hundred and twenty patients completed the survey. In current clinical practice, symptoms are mostly collected through verbal questions and paper-based questionnaires. Seventy-two percent of patients were satisfied with these methods; 82% were in favor of using ePROMs. Most patients were not concerned about privacy (82%), while a minority was concerned about possible lack of interest by clinicians in the symptoms digitally reported (14%) and the possible negative impact on doctor–patient relationship (39%). Seventy-seven percent of respondents declared to be familiar with technological tools and 83% were confident with the availability of internet connection.

Conclusions

In our center, most patients are satisfied with current methods of symptom monitoring and would also be in favor of the introduction of ePROMs. However, several aspects still need to be addressed for universal implementation of ePROMs in routine practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在癌症临床实践中采用电子患者报告结果:意大利患者的观点
背景2022年,欧洲肿瘤内科学会(ESMO)指南建议在癌症患者的常规临床实践中采用电子患者报告结果测量(ePROMs)。本调查旨在从患者的角度出发,确定在日常肿瘤临床实践中实施电子患者报告结果测量(ePROMs)过程中会出现的关键问题。材料与方法2023年3月至4月,在意大利都灵毛里齐亚诺医院接受治疗的门诊癌症患者填写了一份纸质问卷。其中七个问题涉及被调查者的特征,八个问题涉及对目前用于收集患者症状和毒性信息的方法的满意度,以及对实施电子病历管理系统的几个潜在关键问题的看法。在目前的临床实践中,主要通过口头提问和纸质问卷收集症状信息。72%的患者对这些方法表示满意;82%的患者赞成使用电子病历管理系统。大多数患者不担心隐私问题(82%),少数患者担心临床医生可能对数字报告的症状不感兴趣(14%),以及可能对医患关系产生负面影响(39%)。77%的受访者表示熟悉技术工具,83%的受访者对互联网连接的可用性有信心。然而,要在常规实践中普及电子病历管理系统,还需要解决几个方面的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Utility of automated data transfer for cancer clinical trials and considerations for implementation Characterisation of oncology EHR-derived real-world data in the UK, Germany, and Japan Evolving treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma post-avelumab maintenance approval: insights from The US Oncology Network Collaborating across sectors in service of open science, precision oncology, and patients: an overview of the AACR Project GENIE (Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange) Biopharma Collaborative (BPC) Data analytics for real-world data integration in TKI-treated NSCLC patients using electronic health records
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1