What is the association of polypharmacy with frailty in heart failure? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Konstantinos Prokopidis, Giuseppe Dario Testa, Nicola Veronese, Yannis Dionyssiotis, Joseph McLean, Lauren E Walker, Rajiv Sankaranarayanan
{"title":"What is the association of polypharmacy with frailty in heart failure? A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Konstantinos Prokopidis, Giuseppe Dario Testa, Nicola Veronese, Yannis Dionyssiotis, Joseph McLean, Lauren E Walker, Rajiv Sankaranarayanan","doi":"10.22540/JFSF-09-051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the differences in the number of prescribed medications and polypharmacy risk between patients with heart failure (HF) and frailty vs. those with HF but without frailty. Eligible studies included observational or experimental studies in patients aged ≥50 years. Thirteen studies met the criteria and were included in the final analysis. Patients with frailty and HF exhibited a higher risk of polypharmacy (OR: 1.87, 95% CI 1.72 - 2.04, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%, P < 0.01) compared to those without frailty. Results remained significant after adjusting for comorbidity status. Additionally, patients with frailty and HF were prescribed more medications compared to those without (<i>k</i> = 6; MD: 1.43, 95% CI 0.31 - 2.55, I<sup>2</sup> = 94%, P = 0.01), with a high degree of heterogeneity. However, results were non-significant after adjustment for comorbidity status. Patients with HF and frailty have a higher need of polypharmacy compared to those without frailty, which may increase the risk of potentially inappropriate medications (PIM). Investigating the real-world prevalence of PIM may support clinicians in their routine assessment as part of a comprehensive management strategy in patients with HF and frailty.</p>","PeriodicalId":73754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls","volume":"9 1","pages":"51-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10910251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-09-051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the differences in the number of prescribed medications and polypharmacy risk between patients with heart failure (HF) and frailty vs. those with HF but without frailty. Eligible studies included observational or experimental studies in patients aged ≥50 years. Thirteen studies met the criteria and were included in the final analysis. Patients with frailty and HF exhibited a higher risk of polypharmacy (OR: 1.87, 95% CI 1.72 - 2.04, I2 = 0%, P < 0.01) compared to those without frailty. Results remained significant after adjusting for comorbidity status. Additionally, patients with frailty and HF were prescribed more medications compared to those without (k = 6; MD: 1.43, 95% CI 0.31 - 2.55, I2 = 94%, P = 0.01), with a high degree of heterogeneity. However, results were non-significant after adjustment for comorbidity status. Patients with HF and frailty have a higher need of polypharmacy compared to those without frailty, which may increase the risk of potentially inappropriate medications (PIM). Investigating the real-world prevalence of PIM may support clinicians in their routine assessment as part of a comprehensive management strategy in patients with HF and frailty.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多药治疗与心力衰竭患者的虚弱有什么关系?系统回顾与荟萃分析。
本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在探讨心力衰竭(HF)和体弱患者与心力衰竭但不体弱的患者在处方药数量和多重用药风险方面的差异。符合条件的研究包括针对年龄≥50岁患者的观察性或实验性研究。有 13 项研究符合标准并被纳入最终分析。与无体弱症状的患者相比,体弱且患有心房颤动的患者使用多种药物的风险更高(OR:1.87,95% CI 1.72 - 2.04,I2 = 0%,P < 0.01)。调整合并症状况后,结果仍有意义。此外,与非虚弱患者相比,虚弱合并心房颤动患者的处方用药较多(k = 6;MD:1.43,95% CI 0.31 - 2.55,I2 = 94%,P = 0.01),异质性较高。然而,在对合并症状况进行调整后,结果并不显著。与非体弱患者相比,患有心房颤动且体弱的患者对多种药物的需求更高,这可能会增加潜在用药不当(PIM)的风险。调查 PIM 在现实世界中的流行情况可帮助临床医生进行常规评估,作为对心房颤动合并虚弱患者综合管理策略的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Economic Cost Analysis of Implementing a Frailty Care Bundle to Reduce Risk of Hospital Associated Decline Among Older Patients. Can EWGSOP2 and SDOC Definitions of Sarcopenia Identify Functional Muscle Quality? Effects of an Oral Nutritional Supplementation and Physical Exercise Intervention on Older Adults at Risk for Sarcopenia. Examining the Cycle of Physical Frailty in Falls Clinic Attendees Through Structural Equation Modeling. Prognostic Impact of Each Item of the SARC-F Questionnaire in Patients Undergoing Major Surgery for Urologic Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1