Silica Fume-Red Mud Based Geopolymer Stabilized Organic Soil

Rezaul Islam Choudhury, Monowar Hussain
{"title":"Silica Fume-Red Mud Based Geopolymer Stabilized Organic Soil","authors":"Rezaul Islam Choudhury, Monowar Hussain","doi":"10.4028/p-vdler9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organic soil presents significant challenges for construction due to its unsuitability as a soil type, often necessitating stabilization using conventional agents like cement. The Silica Fume (SF)-Red Mud (RM) binder mix emerges as a promising alternative stabilizer due to its low carbon footprint coupled with its superior strength-enhancing properties. In this study,we explore the feasibility of employing SF-RM based geopolymer to stabilize organic soil. To activate the collected samples, a solution of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) with molarity (M) of 6, 9, and 12 were utilized, as well as binder (SF + RM) proportions of 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% relative to dried organic soil and alkali-to-binder (A/B) proportions of 0.5, 0.7, and 0.9, respectively. The experimental results reveal that a variety of factors, including NaOH molarity, A/B proportions, pH, and curing duration, have an effect on the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of treated organic soil. The best combination was obtained with a binder concentration of 30%, a NaOH molarity of 9M, and an A/B proportion of 0.7. After 28 days of curing, the UCS of the treated organic soil (1714 kPa) was found to be 168 times that of the untreated organic soil (10.2kPa). Further, the production of compounds such as aluminium silicate, sodium aluminosilicate, and potassium aluminosilicate, which have been found by X-ray diffraction (XRD) research, can be ascribed to the increase in strength. Furthermore, when subjected to analysis through Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM), it becomes evident that these items play a pivotal role in filling the voids within the soil-binder composite. As a consequence, they facilitate the creation of a more smoother, compact and denser structure.","PeriodicalId":18262,"journal":{"name":"Materials Science Forum","volume":"114 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Science Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4028/p-vdler9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organic soil presents significant challenges for construction due to its unsuitability as a soil type, often necessitating stabilization using conventional agents like cement. The Silica Fume (SF)-Red Mud (RM) binder mix emerges as a promising alternative stabilizer due to its low carbon footprint coupled with its superior strength-enhancing properties. In this study,we explore the feasibility of employing SF-RM based geopolymer to stabilize organic soil. To activate the collected samples, a solution of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) with molarity (M) of 6, 9, and 12 were utilized, as well as binder (SF + RM) proportions of 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% relative to dried organic soil and alkali-to-binder (A/B) proportions of 0.5, 0.7, and 0.9, respectively. The experimental results reveal that a variety of factors, including NaOH molarity, A/B proportions, pH, and curing duration, have an effect on the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of treated organic soil. The best combination was obtained with a binder concentration of 30%, a NaOH molarity of 9M, and an A/B proportion of 0.7. After 28 days of curing, the UCS of the treated organic soil (1714 kPa) was found to be 168 times that of the untreated organic soil (10.2kPa). Further, the production of compounds such as aluminium silicate, sodium aluminosilicate, and potassium aluminosilicate, which have been found by X-ray diffraction (XRD) research, can be ascribed to the increase in strength. Furthermore, when subjected to analysis through Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM), it becomes evident that these items play a pivotal role in filling the voids within the soil-binder composite. As a consequence, they facilitate the creation of a more smoother, compact and denser structure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
硅灰红泥土基土工聚合物稳定有机土壤
有机土壤由于不适合作为土壤类型,往往需要使用水泥等常规稳定剂,这给建筑工程带来了巨大挑战。硅灰(SF)-红泥(RM)混合粘结剂因其低碳足迹和卓越的强度增强性能而成为一种很有前途的替代稳定剂。在这项研究中,我们探讨了使用基于 SF-RM 的土工聚合物来稳定有机土壤的可行性。为了活化收集到的样品,我们使用了摩尔数(M)分别为 6、9 和 12 的氢氧化钠(NaOH)溶液,以及相对于干燥有机土壤 10%、20%、30% 和 40% 的粘结剂(SF + RM)和分别为 0.5、0.7 和 0.9 的碱-粘结剂(A/B)比例。实验结果表明,NaOH 摩尔数、A/B 比例、pH 值和固化时间等多种因素都会对处理过的有机土壤的无压抗压强度(UCS)产生影响。粘结剂浓度为 30%、NaOH 摩尔浓度为 9M、A/B 比例为 0.7 时获得了最佳组合。经过 28 天的固化后,发现处理过的有机土壤的 UCS(1714 千帕)是未处理过的有机土壤(10.2 千帕)的 168 倍。此外,通过 X 射线衍射(XRD)研究发现,硅酸铝、硅酸铝钠和硅酸铝钾等化合物的产生也是强度增加的原因。此外,通过场发射扫描电子显微镜(FESEM)进行分析,可以明显看出这些物质在填充土壤粘结剂复合材料内部的空隙方面发挥了关键作用。因此,它们有助于形成更加平滑、紧凑和致密的结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Friction Stir Weld (FSW) Process Parameters on Tensile Strength, Macro Structure, and Hardness in Results of AA7075 Butt Joints Study of the Physic-Mechanical Properties of a Typha Concrete Composites: A Possible New Material for Sustainable Construction Incorporating Graphene Nanofiller for the Improvement of Hydrophobic Properties of Cassava Peel Starch Bioplastic Microstructure and Mechanical Characteristics of Friction Welded Joint between Alumina and Aluminum Casting Alloy Effect of Silanized Zirconium Oxide (ZrO2) Filler on Hardness of Acrylic-Based Denture Teeth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1