Comparing the interactions of risk factors by method of suicide among veterans: A moderated network analysis approach.

IF 3.1 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of psychopathology and clinical science Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-21 DOI:10.1037/abn0000895
Amanda M Raines, Kathryn S Macia, Jamie L Tock, Claire Houtsma, Jane Herwehe, Joseph Constans
{"title":"Comparing the interactions of risk factors by method of suicide among veterans: A moderated network analysis approach.","authors":"Amanda M Raines, Kathryn S Macia, Jamie L Tock, Claire Houtsma, Jane Herwehe, Joseph Constans","doi":"10.1037/abn0000895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the well-established link between firearm access and suicide, less is known about other variables that may influence the risk for death by self-inflicted gunshot versus other methods of suicide. As individual factors have demonstrated limited predictive ability, scholars have called for studies that consider the multifaceted relations between myriad variables. One alternative to the typical cause-and-effect approach for investigating various forms of psychopathology is network analysis. However, few studies have applied this method to suicidal outcomes, particularly in the context of a veteran population. Data from 19,234 male veteran suicide decedents (89.1% White; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 57.16, <i>SD</i> = 18.64) acquired from the National Violent Death Reporting System were used to investigate characteristics of veteran suicide decedents who died by self-inflicted gunshot (gun; 66.4%) versus alternative methods (nongun, e.g., poisoning, hanging; 33.5%). Results of the overall moderated network model indicated that veterans in the gun group were more likely to have a physical health problem that contributed to the suicide than veterans in the nongun group. Additionally, results of the moderated network model revealed several pairs of associated circumstances whose relationships were significantly moderated by method of suicide, the three strongest of which included having a physical health problem that contributed to the suicide. Overall, results suggest that public health prevention and intervention efforts aimed at reducing the overall burden of physical health problems among male veterans may mitigate the risk of firearm suicides. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":" ","pages":"273-284"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the well-established link between firearm access and suicide, less is known about other variables that may influence the risk for death by self-inflicted gunshot versus other methods of suicide. As individual factors have demonstrated limited predictive ability, scholars have called for studies that consider the multifaceted relations between myriad variables. One alternative to the typical cause-and-effect approach for investigating various forms of psychopathology is network analysis. However, few studies have applied this method to suicidal outcomes, particularly in the context of a veteran population. Data from 19,234 male veteran suicide decedents (89.1% White; Mage = 57.16, SD = 18.64) acquired from the National Violent Death Reporting System were used to investigate characteristics of veteran suicide decedents who died by self-inflicted gunshot (gun; 66.4%) versus alternative methods (nongun, e.g., poisoning, hanging; 33.5%). Results of the overall moderated network model indicated that veterans in the gun group were more likely to have a physical health problem that contributed to the suicide than veterans in the nongun group. Additionally, results of the moderated network model revealed several pairs of associated circumstances whose relationships were significantly moderated by method of suicide, the three strongest of which included having a physical health problem that contributed to the suicide. Overall, results suggest that public health prevention and intervention efforts aimed at reducing the overall burden of physical health problems among male veterans may mitigate the risk of firearm suicides. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较退伍军人自杀方式中风险因素的相互作用:缓和网络分析方法
尽管获取枪支与自杀之间的联系已得到证实,但人们对可能影响自残式枪杀与其他自杀方式的风险的其他变量却知之甚少。由于单个因素的预测能力有限,学者们呼吁开展研究,考虑众多变量之间的多方面关系。在研究各种形式的精神病理学时,除了典型的因果关系研究方法外,还有一种方法就是网络分析。然而,很少有研究将这种方法应用于自杀结果,尤其是在退伍军人群体中。研究人员利用从全国暴力死亡报告系统中获得的 19,234 名男性退伍军人(89.1% 为白人;Mage = 57.16,SD = 18.64)的自杀死亡数据,调查了自残式枪杀(枪杀;66.4%)与其他自杀方式(非枪杀,如中毒、上吊;33.5%)的退伍军人自杀死亡特征。整体调节网络模型的结果表明,与非枪杀组相比,枪杀组的退伍军人更有可能因身体健康问题而导致自杀。此外,调节网络模型的结果显示,有几对相关情况的关系受到自杀方式的显著调节,其中最强的三个因素包括有导致自杀的身体健康问题。总之,研究结果表明,旨在减轻男性退伍军人身体健康问题总体负担的公共卫生预防和干预措施可能会降低持枪自杀的风险。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modeling the dynamics of addiction relapse via the double-well potential system. Adolescent social anxiety is associated with diminished discrimination of anticipated threat and safety in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. Prevalence, incidence, impairment, course, and diagnostic progression and transition of eating disorders, overweight, and obesity in a large prospective study of high-risk young women. Reification of the p factor draws attention away from external causes of psychopathology. Clarifying the place of p300 in the empirical structure of psychopathology over development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1