What the general factor of psychological problems is-And is not.

IF 3.1 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of psychopathology and clinical science Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1037/abn0000978
Tyler M Moore, Brooks Applegate, Benjamin B Lahey
{"title":"What the general factor of psychological problems is-And is not.","authors":"Tyler M Moore, Brooks Applegate, Benjamin B Lahey","doi":"10.1037/abn0000978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article discusses the general factor of psychological problems. Hundreds of published studies have advanced understanding of the general factor of psychological problems, but confusion still surrounds the hypothesis. This partly results from critics conflating the hypotheses with those of other authors, but they have created confusion ourselves by stating two hypotheses involving the general factor, which they better differentiate here. In the psychometric general factor hypothesis, the general factor is simply the term in bifactor models that quantifies the variance shared by all measured psychological problems, whereas two or more specific factors are defined by orthogonal pools of variance shared only by items loading on each specific factor. Although the psychometric bifactor model is sometimes viewed as an alternative to taxonomic models based on correlated factor models, it is not. Those models properly describe the overlapping dimensions of psychological problems experienced in everyday life. Because bifactor and correlated factors models serve different purposes, there is no need to compare their fits. The separate hierarchical causal hypothesis is that correlations among all problems that define the general factor result from some of their causes and mechanisms being directly or indirectly shared, whereas the specific factors are the result of other causes being shared by subsets of problems. There is growing evidence that some genetic and environmental causes-and their attendant psychobiological mechanisms-are shared to varying degrees with essentially all psychological problems. Other independent causes and mechanisms influence only subgroups of psychological problems (e.g., internalizing problems), and still others are problem-specific. At this point, the evidence is informative but only correlational. Nonetheless, there is evidence that some measured variables of potential causal and mechanistic significance are empirically correlated with the general factor term in bifactor models, whereas other risk factors are correlated with the terms for the specific factors of psychological problems. Other studies have shown that the general factor of psychological problems is robustly correlated with important psychological constructs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses the general factor of psychological problems. Hundreds of published studies have advanced understanding of the general factor of psychological problems, but confusion still surrounds the hypothesis. This partly results from critics conflating the hypotheses with those of other authors, but they have created confusion ourselves by stating two hypotheses involving the general factor, which they better differentiate here. In the psychometric general factor hypothesis, the general factor is simply the term in bifactor models that quantifies the variance shared by all measured psychological problems, whereas two or more specific factors are defined by orthogonal pools of variance shared only by items loading on each specific factor. Although the psychometric bifactor model is sometimes viewed as an alternative to taxonomic models based on correlated factor models, it is not. Those models properly describe the overlapping dimensions of psychological problems experienced in everyday life. Because bifactor and correlated factors models serve different purposes, there is no need to compare their fits. The separate hierarchical causal hypothesis is that correlations among all problems that define the general factor result from some of their causes and mechanisms being directly or indirectly shared, whereas the specific factors are the result of other causes being shared by subsets of problems. There is growing evidence that some genetic and environmental causes-and their attendant psychobiological mechanisms-are shared to varying degrees with essentially all psychological problems. Other independent causes and mechanisms influence only subgroups of psychological problems (e.g., internalizing problems), and still others are problem-specific. At this point, the evidence is informative but only correlational. Nonetheless, there is evidence that some measured variables of potential causal and mechanistic significance are empirically correlated with the general factor term in bifactor models, whereas other risk factors are correlated with the terms for the specific factors of psychological problems. Other studies have shown that the general factor of psychological problems is robustly correlated with important psychological constructs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Delineating empirically plausible causal pathways to suicidality among people at clinical high risk for psychosis. What the general factor of psychological problems is-And is not. Posttraumatic reexperiencing and alcohol use: Mediofrontal theta as a neural mechanism for negative reinforcement. Suicide risk assessment and management protocol for research within the Department of Veterans Affairs. Enhanced creativity in autism is due to co-occurring attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1