Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories and Online News Consumption during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic

Soyeon Jin, Jan Zilinsky, Franziska Pradel, Yannis Theocharis
{"title":"Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories and Online News Consumption during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Soyeon Jin, Jan Zilinsky, Franziska Pradel, Yannis Theocharis","doi":"10.51685/jqd.2024.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using an original survey covering 17 countries, this paper documents the prevalence of beliefs in conspiracy theories related to the COVID-19 pandemic and characterizes the informational, demographic, and trust profiles of individuals who believe them. There is considerable variation across countries in the level of conspiracy beliefs, with people in a set of countries like Romania, Poland, Greece, and Hungary being relatively more susceptible than respondents in Northern Europe. We find several factors are correlated with conspiracy beliefs across countries. Relative to respondents who do not read news on social media, social media users tend to endorse more conspiracies, and this is the case for Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube users in particular. We also observe a link between distrust in medical experts or government and endorsement of conspiracy theories in most countries. In a subset of countries, we also find individuals with medium level of education and those who are younger to believe in a higher number of conspiracy theories. ","PeriodicalId":509803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2024.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using an original survey covering 17 countries, this paper documents the prevalence of beliefs in conspiracy theories related to the COVID-19 pandemic and characterizes the informational, demographic, and trust profiles of individuals who believe them. There is considerable variation across countries in the level of conspiracy beliefs, with people in a set of countries like Romania, Poland, Greece, and Hungary being relatively more susceptible than respondents in Northern Europe. We find several factors are correlated with conspiracy beliefs across countries. Relative to respondents who do not read news on social media, social media users tend to endorse more conspiracies, and this is the case for Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube users in particular. We also observe a link between distrust in medical experts or government and endorsement of conspiracy theories in most countries. In a subset of countries, we also find individuals with medium level of education and those who are younger to believe in a higher number of conspiracy theories. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行期间的阴谋论信仰与网络新闻消费
本文通过一项覆盖 17 个国家的原始调查,记录了与 COVID-19 大流行病相关的阴谋论信仰的普遍程度,并描述了相信这些阴谋论的个人的信息、人口和信任特征。各国的阴谋论信仰水平存在很大差异,罗马尼亚、波兰、希腊和匈牙利等国的受访者比北欧国家的受访者更容易相信阴谋论。我们发现有几个因素与各国的阴谋论信念相关。与不在社交媒体上阅读新闻的受访者相比,社交媒体用户倾向于支持更多的阴谋论,尤其是 Facebook、Instagram 和 YouTube 用户。在大多数国家,我们还观察到不信任医学专家或政府与赞同阴谋论之间的联系。在一部分国家,我们还发现中等教育水平的人和年轻人相信更多的阴谋论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
(Mis)measurement of Political Content Exposure within the Smartphone Ecosystem Battle for Inbox and Bucks Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories and Online News Consumption during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic Death of a Platform? Proud Boys on Telegram
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1