(Mis)measurement of Political Content Exposure within the Smartphone Ecosystem

Daniel Muise, David Markowitz, Byron Reeves, Nilam Ram, Thomas N. Robinson
{"title":"(Mis)measurement of Political Content Exposure within the Smartphone Ecosystem","authors":"Daniel Muise, David Markowitz, Byron Reeves, Nilam Ram, Thomas N. Robinson","doi":"10.51685/jqd.2024.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The affordances of the smartphone are shifting individuals toward ever smaller and more fragmented units of political experience. In this piece, we make use of a novel approach to granular assessment of political exposure on smartphones, revealing an incredible level of complexity in modern political content diets, somewhat at odds with simplifying assumptions commonly made by political communication research. Based on five million screen-recording frames taken from 119 smartphones over two weeks, we find clear challenges to three common assumptions in the literature, with clear impacts on new theories about fragmented political media use: Assumption (1) unique encounters with political content can be aggregated by tabulation as though they are equivalent experiences; (2) durations of exposure to political content can be aggregated (e.g., at a monthly or daily level) without regard for how those time units are clustered at smaller timescales; and (3) singular political formats or sources (particularly the news formats and sources) are sufficient proxies for measuring and manipulating overall political content exposure. Regarding the first and second assumptions, our findings suggest that the majority of political content exposure occurs in bursts of only a few potentially-forgettable seconds, and that the remainder follow a power-law curve that reemerges across apps and individuals, with extreme variability within and across individuals. Regarding the third assumption, we find the vast majority of political content is encountered from formats and sources other than news and social media. We articulate how these results fit within and augment literature focused on political content exposure.","PeriodicalId":509803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media","volume":"35 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2024.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The affordances of the smartphone are shifting individuals toward ever smaller and more fragmented units of political experience. In this piece, we make use of a novel approach to granular assessment of political exposure on smartphones, revealing an incredible level of complexity in modern political content diets, somewhat at odds with simplifying assumptions commonly made by political communication research. Based on five million screen-recording frames taken from 119 smartphones over two weeks, we find clear challenges to three common assumptions in the literature, with clear impacts on new theories about fragmented political media use: Assumption (1) unique encounters with political content can be aggregated by tabulation as though they are equivalent experiences; (2) durations of exposure to political content can be aggregated (e.g., at a monthly or daily level) without regard for how those time units are clustered at smaller timescales; and (3) singular political formats or sources (particularly the news formats and sources) are sufficient proxies for measuring and manipulating overall political content exposure. Regarding the first and second assumptions, our findings suggest that the majority of political content exposure occurs in bursts of only a few potentially-forgettable seconds, and that the remainder follow a power-law curve that reemerges across apps and individuals, with extreme variability within and across individuals. Regarding the third assumption, we find the vast majority of political content is encountered from formats and sources other than news and social media. We articulate how these results fit within and augment literature focused on political content exposure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(对智能手机生态系统中政治内容曝光的(错误)测量
智能手机的便利性使个人的政治体验单元越来越小、越来越分散。在这篇文章中,我们采用了一种新颖的方法,对智能手机上的政治曝光进行细化评估,揭示了现代政治内容饮食中令人难以置信的复杂程度,这与政治传播研究中常见的简化假设有些不符。基于两周内从 119 部智能手机上截取的 500 万帧屏幕记录,我们发现文献中的三个常见假设受到了明显挑战,并对碎片化政治媒体使用的新理论产生了明显影响:假设(1)与政治内容的独特接触可以通过表格汇总,就好像它们是等同的经历;(2)接触政治内容的持续时间可以汇总(如每月或每天),而无需考虑这些时间单位在更小的时间尺度上是如何聚类的;以及(3)单一的政治形式或来源(尤其是新闻形式和来源)是衡量和操纵整体政治内容接触的充分替代物。关于第一项和第二项假设,我们的研究结果表明,大部分政治内容的接触都是在短短几秒钟内发生的,其余的内容则遵循幂律曲线,这种曲线在不同的应用程序和个人之间重新出现,在个人内部和个人之间存在极大的差异。关于第三个假设,我们发现绝大多数政治内容是通过新闻和社交媒体以外的形式和来源接触到的。我们阐述了这些结果如何与关注政治内容接触的文献相吻合,并对这些文献进行了补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
(Mis)measurement of Political Content Exposure within the Smartphone Ecosystem Battle for Inbox and Bucks Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories and Online News Consumption during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic Death of a Platform? Proud Boys on Telegram
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1