Battle for Inbox and Bucks

Bin Chen, Porsmita Borah, Ross Dahlke, Josephine Lukito
{"title":"Battle for Inbox and Bucks","authors":"Bin Chen, Porsmita Borah, Ross Dahlke, Josephine Lukito","doi":"10.51685/jqd.2024.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite its proven pervasiveness and effectiveness, the role of email in political campaigns has been understudied. In this article, we seek to understand the use of emails by Donald Trump's and Joe Biden's campaigns during the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Employing newly collected email data (N = 4051), we compared how the two campaign teams differ in the use of appeals in their emails, and the functions of the message (e.g., attack, acclaim). We found that, while both campaigns used emails primarily for fundraising, Trump's campaign (compared to Biden’s campaign) was more likely to use all of the four appeals we defined — material, solidarity, ideology, and issue appeals. We also found that by sending emails, Biden's campaign tends to acclaim itself more while Trump's campaign attacks opponents more.","PeriodicalId":509803,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media","volume":"40 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2024.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite its proven pervasiveness and effectiveness, the role of email in political campaigns has been understudied. In this article, we seek to understand the use of emails by Donald Trump's and Joe Biden's campaigns during the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Employing newly collected email data (N = 4051), we compared how the two campaign teams differ in the use of appeals in their emails, and the functions of the message (e.g., attack, acclaim). We found that, while both campaigns used emails primarily for fundraising, Trump's campaign (compared to Biden’s campaign) was more likely to use all of the four appeals we defined — material, solidarity, ideology, and issue appeals. We also found that by sending emails, Biden's campaign tends to acclaim itself more while Trump's campaign attacks opponents more.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
收件箱和奖金争夺战
尽管电子邮件的普遍性和有效性已得到证实,但人们对其在政治竞选中的作用研究不足。在本文中,我们试图了解唐纳德-特朗普(Donald Trump)和乔-拜登(Joe Biden)的竞选团队在 2020 年美国总统大选中使用电子邮件的情况。利用最新收集的电子邮件数据(N = 4051),我们比较了两个竞选团队在电子邮件中使用的呼吁方式以及信息的功能(如攻击、赞誉)方面有何不同。我们发现,虽然两个竞选团队都将电子邮件主要用于筹款,但特朗普的竞选团队(与拜登的竞选团队相比)更倾向于使用我们定义的所有四种诉求--物质诉求、团结诉求、意识形态诉求和议题诉求。我们还发现,通过发送电子邮件,拜登的竞选团队倾向于更多地赞美自己,而特朗普的竞选团队则更多地攻击对手。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
(Mis)measurement of Political Content Exposure within the Smartphone Ecosystem Battle for Inbox and Bucks Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories and Online News Consumption during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic Death of a Platform? Proud Boys on Telegram
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1