First density estimates for a recovering bobcat population in Ohio using DNA from scat

Marissa A. Dyck, Genelle Uhrig, Stephen Spear, R. Iosif, V. Popescu
{"title":"First density estimates for a recovering bobcat population in Ohio using DNA from scat","authors":"Marissa A. Dyck, Genelle Uhrig, Stephen Spear, R. Iosif, V. Popescu","doi":"10.1002/1438-390x.12184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recovery of mammalian species in the US Midwest through natural recolonization constitutes a conservation success story, yet management remains challenging due to many unknowns related to population dynamics and numeric trends. Abundance is a critical parameter for management decisions, and estimating the density and abundance of elusive species, such as terrestrial carnivores, remains challenging despite recent technological advances. In this study, we evaluated density and abundance of a recovering carnivore species, the bobcat (Lynx rufus) in two areas of Ohio using non‐invasive DNA from scat. The target areas in eastern and southern Ohio have been shown to have uneven dynamics and recolonization success and we expected that this would be reflected in differences in density and abundance. We collected 298 bobcat scats between July 2018 and April 2019 on 150 km of repeated transects. Of these, 102 scats were successfully genotyped, and 55 individuals were identified (33 in eastern Ohio and 22 in southern Ohio). Using Spatially Explicit Capture–Recapture models, we estimated 18.9 ± 4.1 and 10.9 ± 2.7 bobcats/100 km2 in eastern and southern Ohio study areas, respectively. Our results support prior telemetry data which indicated that bobcats in eastern Ohio had smaller home‐ranges than bobcats in southern Ohio, and thus could support a higher density of individuals. The higher densities were similar to other eastern US populations and are much higher than other Midwestern recovering populations. Our results provide a snapshot of the population status and can be used to determine sustainable management strategies for Ohio's bobcat population.","PeriodicalId":503432,"journal":{"name":"Population Ecology","volume":"47 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1438-390x.12184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recovery of mammalian species in the US Midwest through natural recolonization constitutes a conservation success story, yet management remains challenging due to many unknowns related to population dynamics and numeric trends. Abundance is a critical parameter for management decisions, and estimating the density and abundance of elusive species, such as terrestrial carnivores, remains challenging despite recent technological advances. In this study, we evaluated density and abundance of a recovering carnivore species, the bobcat (Lynx rufus) in two areas of Ohio using non‐invasive DNA from scat. The target areas in eastern and southern Ohio have been shown to have uneven dynamics and recolonization success and we expected that this would be reflected in differences in density and abundance. We collected 298 bobcat scats between July 2018 and April 2019 on 150 km of repeated transects. Of these, 102 scats were successfully genotyped, and 55 individuals were identified (33 in eastern Ohio and 22 in southern Ohio). Using Spatially Explicit Capture–Recapture models, we estimated 18.9 ± 4.1 and 10.9 ± 2.7 bobcats/100 km2 in eastern and southern Ohio study areas, respectively. Our results support prior telemetry data which indicated that bobcats in eastern Ohio had smaller home‐ranges than bobcats in southern Ohio, and thus could support a higher density of individuals. The higher densities were similar to other eastern US populations and are much higher than other Midwestern recovering populations. Our results provide a snapshot of the population status and can be used to determine sustainable management strategies for Ohio's bobcat population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用粪便中的 DNA 首次估算俄亥俄州正在恢复的山猫种群密度
在美国中西部,哺乳动物物种通过自然重新定殖而得以恢复,这是一个成功的保护案例,但由于与种群动态和数量趋势相关的许多未知因素,管理仍然具有挑战性。丰度是管理决策的一个关键参数,尽管近年来技术不断进步,但对陆生食肉动物等难以捉摸的物种的密度和丰度进行估算仍然具有挑战性。在这项研究中,我们利用粪便中的非侵入性 DNA 评估了俄亥俄州两个地区正在恢复的食肉动物物种山猫(Lynx rufus)的密度和丰度。俄亥俄州东部和南部的目标地区已被证明具有不均衡的动态和重新定居的成功率,我们预计这将反映在密度和丰度的差异上。2018 年 7 月至 2019 年 4 月期间,我们在 150 公里的重复横断面上收集了 298 个山猫的猫粪。其中,102 只山猫的蜕皮被成功地进行了基因分型,55 只个体被确认(俄亥俄州东部 33 只,俄亥俄州南部 22 只)。利用空间明确捕获-再捕获模型,我们估计俄亥俄州东部和南部研究区域的山猫数量分别为 18.9 ± 4.1 和 10.9 ± 2.7 只/100 平方公里。我们的结果支持之前的遥测数据,这些数据表明俄亥俄州东部山猫的活动范围小于俄亥俄州南部山猫的活动范围,因此可以支持更高的个体密度。较高的密度与美国东部的其他种群相似,比中西部其他正在恢复的种群要高得多。我们的研究结果为山猫种群状况提供了一个快照,可用于确定俄亥俄州山猫种群的可持续管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preface for the special feature on “Population ecology of COVID‐19: Similarities and differences between epidemiology and ecological population management” Contributions and problems of mathematical models in COVID‐19 prevention in Japan A comparative study of population management approaches in infectious disease control, population management of fisheries and wildlife, and integrated pest management in agriculture First density estimates for a recovering bobcat population in Ohio using DNA from scat Detailed kinship estimation for detecting bias among breeding families in a reintroduced population of the endangered bagrid catfish Tachysurus ichikawai
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1