Political contestation: Ideology and linguistic realization by 2024 prospective Indonesian presidential candidates

Amrin Saragih, Yuni Khairina, Khairunnisa Br. Batubara
{"title":"Political contestation: Ideology and linguistic realization by 2024 prospective Indonesian presidential candidates","authors":"Amrin Saragih, Yuni Khairina, Khairunnisa Br. Batubara","doi":"10.33369/joall.v9i1.31677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The political statements of prospective presidential candidates in the Republic of Indonesia (RI) in the pre-election period of 2024, in 2023, constitute texts of political contestation (PC) loaded with ideology. This research examines those PC texts. The texts are based on the respective ideologies of each presidential candidate. More specifically, this study investigates the ideologies of the presidential candidates, the linguistic realization used to express those ideologies, and the reasons behind the use of ideology and its linguistic realization. This research employs a qualitative descriptive design. Data collection tools included observation, document analysis, and interviews. The data sources were KP texts from three presidential candidates: Anies Rasyid Baswedan, Ganjar Pranowo, and Prabowo Subianto, obtained from newspapers, television, and social media platforms such as WhatsApp, Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook. The data, in the form of KP texts, were analyzed using the framework of systemic functional linguistic theory (SFL) as developed by Halliday (2014) and other SFL experts. The research findings indicate that, in addition to similarities, the three presidential candidates have differences in leadership ideology, the linguistic realization of that ideology, and the causes or reasons used. The theoretical contribution of this research enriches applied linguistic theories, especially political discourse analysis (PDA), and simultaneously benefits voters in the 2024 election by helping them understand the ideologies of presidential candidates. This understanding can solidify their decision to vote for a specific candidate, thus reducing the social friction that always occurs during elections in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":273151,"journal":{"name":"JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature)","volume":"52 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literature)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v9i1.31677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The political statements of prospective presidential candidates in the Republic of Indonesia (RI) in the pre-election period of 2024, in 2023, constitute texts of political contestation (PC) loaded with ideology. This research examines those PC texts. The texts are based on the respective ideologies of each presidential candidate. More specifically, this study investigates the ideologies of the presidential candidates, the linguistic realization used to express those ideologies, and the reasons behind the use of ideology and its linguistic realization. This research employs a qualitative descriptive design. Data collection tools included observation, document analysis, and interviews. The data sources were KP texts from three presidential candidates: Anies Rasyid Baswedan, Ganjar Pranowo, and Prabowo Subianto, obtained from newspapers, television, and social media platforms such as WhatsApp, Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook. The data, in the form of KP texts, were analyzed using the framework of systemic functional linguistic theory (SFL) as developed by Halliday (2014) and other SFL experts. The research findings indicate that, in addition to similarities, the three presidential candidates have differences in leadership ideology, the linguistic realization of that ideology, and the causes or reasons used. The theoretical contribution of this research enriches applied linguistic theories, especially political discourse analysis (PDA), and simultaneously benefits voters in the 2024 election by helping them understand the ideologies of presidential candidates. This understanding can solidify their decision to vote for a specific candidate, thus reducing the social friction that always occurs during elections in Indonesia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政治竞争:2024 年印尼准总统候选人的意识形态和语言实现
印度尼西亚共和国(RI)2024 年(2023 年)大选前的准总统候选人的政治声明构成了充满意识形态的政治竞争(PC)文本。本研究对这些政治角逐文本进行了研究。这些文本基于每位总统候选人各自的意识形态。更具体地说,本研究调查了总统候选人的意识形态、表达这些意识形态所使用的语言实现方式,以及使用意识形态及其语言实现方式背后的原因。本研究采用定性描述设计。数据收集工具包括观察、文件分析和访谈。数据来源是三位总统候选人的金伯利进程文本:这些文本来自报纸、电视以及 WhatsApp、Twitter、Instagram 和 Facebook 等社交媒体平台。我们采用 Halliday(2014 年)和其他 SFL 专家提出的系统功能语言学理论(SFL)框架,对 KP 文本形式的数据进行了分析。研究结果表明,除了相似之处,三位总统候选人在领导意识形态、该意识形态的语言实现以及所使用的原因或理由方面存在差异。本研究的理论贡献丰富了应用语言学理论,尤其是政治话语分析(PDA),同时通过帮助选民了解总统候选人的意识形态,使他们在 2024 年大选中受益。这种理解可以巩固他们投票给特定候选人的决定,从而减少印尼选举期间经常出现的社会摩擦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Framing and metaphor in the discourse of Sumatran orangutans’ conservation: Ecolinguistics study Political contestation: Ideology and linguistic realization by 2024 prospective Indonesian presidential candidates An implementation of integrated performance assessment model in vocational English for communication learning Development of a case method learning model to hone students' translation competence in language teaching courses Can the Merdeka Belajar curriculum really improve students’ reading literacy?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1