Life course studies – conceptual and methodological approaches and solution

A. Andreenkova
{"title":"Life course studies – conceptual and methodological approaches and solution","authors":"A. Andreenkova","doi":"10.19181/snsp.2024.12.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies of the life course address the fundamental issue of social sciences – understanding the social change, its directions, reasons and perspectives, the interaction of micro- and macro levels of social reality. Studies of life course developed independently in different social sciences and scientific traditions cover a broad range of topics, issues and methodological approaches. These variety of studies were grouped into few major research frameworks: psychological within the studies of personality development; longitudinal sociological focused on life course of different cohorts and comparative studies of generations, social groups, countries and regions; domain-based – studies of trajectories in different life domains; demographic studying the timing of life events; studies of stability and transformation of values and biographical research. The multiple methodological approaches to study the life course are suggested to group in two main categories – concurrent and retrospective which differ by the time distance between the occurrence of an event and the reporting about the event. Concurrent approach is characterized by relatively high reliability of the measurement, but low flexibility in selecting research indicators, long time for the organization of data collection and large financial investments. Retrospective approach provides high flexibility in organization and design of the survey, allows free selection of indicators to test research hypotheses, but the reliability of the data is hampered by the memory errors and context effect. None of these approaches alone can satisfy the needs and requirements of studying the life course and collecting dynamic multi-level data. The possible solution is to design and test the multimodal approach combining the advantages of different research methods and mitigating their drawbacks. The new long-term longitudinal project “Life course, values and expectations of the generation of 1990s” (G90) included the test of an autobiographical method of data collection for random samples of the general population in quantitative design. The testing revealed high sensitivity of the method to the format (handwritten, printed or oral), high differentiation between respondents in completeness of information and the selection of events included in the autobiography. Supplementing autobiographies by in-depth interviews increased the data standardization, completeness and comparability. The drawbacks of this method found during the survey are high demand for resources for data analysis, individual approach to each autobiography, low respondents’ cooperation in highly demanding tasks, and ethical issues. The future of the life course studies can be found in the convergence of different research frameworks, multidisciplinary research projects, and the application of mixed-model integrated methodology.","PeriodicalId":140749,"journal":{"name":"Sociologicheskaja nauka i social'naja praktika","volume":" 0","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologicheskaja nauka i social'naja praktika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2024.12.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies of the life course address the fundamental issue of social sciences – understanding the social change, its directions, reasons and perspectives, the interaction of micro- and macro levels of social reality. Studies of life course developed independently in different social sciences and scientific traditions cover a broad range of topics, issues and methodological approaches. These variety of studies were grouped into few major research frameworks: psychological within the studies of personality development; longitudinal sociological focused on life course of different cohorts and comparative studies of generations, social groups, countries and regions; domain-based – studies of trajectories in different life domains; demographic studying the timing of life events; studies of stability and transformation of values and biographical research. The multiple methodological approaches to study the life course are suggested to group in two main categories – concurrent and retrospective which differ by the time distance between the occurrence of an event and the reporting about the event. Concurrent approach is characterized by relatively high reliability of the measurement, but low flexibility in selecting research indicators, long time for the organization of data collection and large financial investments. Retrospective approach provides high flexibility in organization and design of the survey, allows free selection of indicators to test research hypotheses, but the reliability of the data is hampered by the memory errors and context effect. None of these approaches alone can satisfy the needs and requirements of studying the life course and collecting dynamic multi-level data. The possible solution is to design and test the multimodal approach combining the advantages of different research methods and mitigating their drawbacks. The new long-term longitudinal project “Life course, values and expectations of the generation of 1990s” (G90) included the test of an autobiographical method of data collection for random samples of the general population in quantitative design. The testing revealed high sensitivity of the method to the format (handwritten, printed or oral), high differentiation between respondents in completeness of information and the selection of events included in the autobiography. Supplementing autobiographies by in-depth interviews increased the data standardization, completeness and comparability. The drawbacks of this method found during the survey are high demand for resources for data analysis, individual approach to each autobiography, low respondents’ cooperation in highly demanding tasks, and ethical issues. The future of the life course studies can be found in the convergence of different research frameworks, multidisciplinary research projects, and the application of mixed-model integrated methodology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生命历程研究--概念、方法和解决方案
生命历程研究涉及社会科学的基本问题--理解社会变革、其方向、原因和视角,以及社会现实的微观和宏观层面的相互作用。不同社会科学和科学传统独立开展的生命历程研究涵盖了广泛的主题、问题和方法。这些不同的研究被归纳为几个主要的研究框架:人格发展研究中的心理学研究;纵向 社会学研究,重点是不同群体的生命历程,以及几代人、社会群体、国家和地区的比较研 究;基于领域的研究--不同生命领域的轨迹研究;人口学研究生命事件发生的时间;价值 观的稳定和转变研究以及传记研究。建议将研究生命历程的多种方法分为两大类--同期法和回顾法。同期法的特点是测量的可靠性相对较高,但选择研究指标的灵活性较低,组织数据收集的时间较长,资金投入较大。回顾性方法在组织和设计调查方面具有较高的灵活性,可以自由选择指标来检验研究假设,但数据的可靠性受到记忆误差和情境效应的影响。这些方法都不能满足研究生命历程和收集多层次动态数据的需要和要求。可能的解决办法是设计和测试多模式方法,将不同研究方法的优点结合起来,并减少其缺点。新的长期纵向项目 "20 世纪 90 年代一代人的生命历程、价值观和期望"(G90)包括在定量设计中对一般人口随机样本的自传式数据收集方法进行测试。测试结果表明,该方法对格式(手写、印刷或口述)的敏感度很高,受访者之间在信息完整性和自传中事件的选择方面差异很大。通过深入访谈对自传进行补充,提高了数据的标准化、完整性和可比性。在调查过程中发现,这种方法的缺点是对数据分析资源的需求量大、对每份自传的处理都是个别的、在高要求的任务中受访者的合作程度低以及伦理问题。不同研究框架的融合、多学科研究项目以及混合模式综合方法的应用是生命历程研究的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The relevance for the institute of mediation in modern Russia Life course studies – conceptual and methodological approaches and solution Digitalization of the сultural sphere in Russia: stages and challenges Urban identity and perception of the city in management discourse Positioning of facts, meanings and terms in the media: theoretical approaches and practice of covering the problems of terrorism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1