Hemoglobin A1c levels and thrombus load in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Mohamed Ali, Hesham Khaled Rashid, Afnan Abdel Aal, shereen farag
{"title":"Hemoglobin A1c levels and thrombus load in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction","authors":"Mohamed Ali, Hesham Khaled Rashid, Afnan Abdel Aal, shereen farag","doi":"10.21608/bmfj.2024.257828.1984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) facing non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) often exhibit a higher incidence of thrombotic events. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, indicative of glycemic control, might influence the thrombus burden in such cases. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between HbA1c, and coronary thrombus burden expressed as thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) thrombus grade, in NSTEMI patients. Methods: This cross-sectional comparative study was carried out on NSTEMI patients with T2DM who underwent early percutaneous coronary angiography. Patients were categorized into two groups based on HbA1c levels: Group I (optimal glycemic control, HbA1c ≤ 6.5%) and group II (suboptimal glycemic control, HbA1c > 6.5%). Detailed clinical, laboratory, and angiographic assessments were performed. The primary outcome measure was the TIMI thrombus grade. Results : Group II showed significantly higher weight compared to group I (p= 0.026). Group II exhibited higher fasting blood glucose (FBG) and Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) levels (p< 0.001). Echocardiographic parameters demonstrated a significantly lower Mitral E in group II (p< 0.001). Angiographic parameters revealed a significant difference in the infarct-related artery (p= 0.026), with higher TIMI thrombus grade scores and Syntax scores in group II (p< 0.001). Revascularization selection varied significantly between groups (p= 0.038). Conclusion: Elevated HbA1c levels in NSTEMI patients with T2DM were associated with increased thrombus burden, as indicated by higher TIMI thrombus grades.","PeriodicalId":503219,"journal":{"name":"Benha Medical Journal","volume":" 42","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benha Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/bmfj.2024.257828.1984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) facing non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) often exhibit a higher incidence of thrombotic events. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, indicative of glycemic control, might influence the thrombus burden in such cases. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between HbA1c, and coronary thrombus burden expressed as thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) thrombus grade, in NSTEMI patients. Methods: This cross-sectional comparative study was carried out on NSTEMI patients with T2DM who underwent early percutaneous coronary angiography. Patients were categorized into two groups based on HbA1c levels: Group I (optimal glycemic control, HbA1c ≤ 6.5%) and group II (suboptimal glycemic control, HbA1c > 6.5%). Detailed clinical, laboratory, and angiographic assessments were performed. The primary outcome measure was the TIMI thrombus grade. Results : Group II showed significantly higher weight compared to group I (p= 0.026). Group II exhibited higher fasting blood glucose (FBG) and Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) levels (p< 0.001). Echocardiographic parameters demonstrated a significantly lower Mitral E in group II (p< 0.001). Angiographic parameters revealed a significant difference in the infarct-related artery (p= 0.026), with higher TIMI thrombus grade scores and Syntax scores in group II (p< 0.001). Revascularization selection varied significantly between groups (p= 0.038). Conclusion: Elevated HbA1c levels in NSTEMI patients with T2DM were associated with increased thrombus burden, as indicated by higher TIMI thrombus grades.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2 型糖尿病和非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的血红蛋白 A1c 水平与血栓负荷
背景:面临非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)的 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者通常血栓事件发生率较高。血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1c)水平是血糖控制的指标,可能会影响此类病例的血栓负荷。本研究旨在评估 HbA1c 与以心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)血栓分级表示的 NSTEMI 患者冠状动脉血栓负荷之间的关系。研究方法这项横断面比较研究的对象是接受早期经皮冠状动脉造影术的 T2DM NSTEMI 患者。根据 HbA1c 水平将患者分为两组:I 组(血糖控制最佳,HbA1c ≤ 6.5%)和 II 组(血糖控制欠佳,HbA1c > 6.5%)。进行了详细的临床、实验室和血管造影评估。主要结果指标为 TIMI 血栓分级。结果:与第一组相比,第二组体重明显增加(P= 0.026)。II组的空腹血糖(FBG)和胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR)水平更高(p< 0.001)。超声心动图参数显示,II 组的二尖瓣 E 显著较低(P< 0.001)。血管造影参数显示,梗死相关动脉有显著差异(p= 0.026),II 组的 TIMI 血栓等级评分和 Syntax 评分更高(p< 0.001)。各组之间的血管重建选择差异显著(p= 0.038)。结论患有 T2DM 的 NSTEMI 患者 HbA1c 水平升高与血栓负荷增加有关,TIMI 血栓等级越高,血栓负荷越重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease on Health-Related Quality of Life Comparing Fair Control of Hyperglycemia contrary to Intensive Control in Patients after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Procedure Comparison of the Onset Time between 0.25% Bupivacaine and 0.5% Bupivacaine for Ultrasound‑Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized Clinical Trial Intramedullary Nailing Versus Minmally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) in Management of Distal Tibial Fractures Correlation between serum estrogen level and endometrial histology in cases of fibroid uterus in peri-menopausal peroid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1