Physicians' lifelong learning journeys: A narrative analysis of continuing professional development struggles

IF 4.9 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Education Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI:10.1111/medu.15375
Louise M. Allen, Dorene Balmer, Lara Varpio
{"title":"Physicians' lifelong learning journeys: A narrative analysis of continuing professional development struggles","authors":"Louise M. Allen, Dorene Balmer, Lara Varpio","doi":"10.1111/medu.15375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionDespite tenacious efforts of continuing professional development (CPD) developers and educators, physician engagement in CPD is fraught with challenges. Research suggests that these educational interventions and the maintenance of professional competence systems that mandate them are often seen as impractical, decontextualized and check‐box activities by participants. This study explores physicians' learning post graduate medical education (GME) training across their CPD journey to understand how they (a) conceive of themselves as learners and (b) engage in lifelong learning across the course of their professional careers.MethodsUsing narrative inquiry and holistic narrative analysis situated within a social constructivist orientation, we carried out individual interviews with physicians from across a large children's hospital network including academic hospitals, community hospitals and primary care practices. Timelines and story arcs were used to support the narrative analysis's re‐storying.ResultsTwelve physicians from six different sub‐specialties were interviewed. We identified three noteworthy challenges as particularly salient across participants' re‐storied narratives: (i) train‐on‐a‐track to treading water, (ii) learning takes a backseat, and (iii) learning through foraging or hunting and gathering. Participants described significant change when transitioning from GME to CPD learning. While participants identified as learners, they described the disorienting impact of losing GME's formal supports and structures. They articulated that patient care trumped learning as their top priority. They lamented having limited insight into their learning needs (e.g. little feedback data) and so resorted to engaging in CPD activities that were readily at hand—but not necessarily relevant—and to finding learning resources that might not be formally recognised for CPD credit.ConclusionsPhysicians' learning journeys post‐GME are challenging, and the systems created to support that learning are ill equipped to meet the needs of physicians transitioning from GME to CPD. To encourage meaningful learning, the complex interplay of factors impeding CPD engagement should inform future innovations.","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15375","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionDespite tenacious efforts of continuing professional development (CPD) developers and educators, physician engagement in CPD is fraught with challenges. Research suggests that these educational interventions and the maintenance of professional competence systems that mandate them are often seen as impractical, decontextualized and check‐box activities by participants. This study explores physicians' learning post graduate medical education (GME) training across their CPD journey to understand how they (a) conceive of themselves as learners and (b) engage in lifelong learning across the course of their professional careers.MethodsUsing narrative inquiry and holistic narrative analysis situated within a social constructivist orientation, we carried out individual interviews with physicians from across a large children's hospital network including academic hospitals, community hospitals and primary care practices. Timelines and story arcs were used to support the narrative analysis's re‐storying.ResultsTwelve physicians from six different sub‐specialties were interviewed. We identified three noteworthy challenges as particularly salient across participants' re‐storied narratives: (i) train‐on‐a‐track to treading water, (ii) learning takes a backseat, and (iii) learning through foraging or hunting and gathering. Participants described significant change when transitioning from GME to CPD learning. While participants identified as learners, they described the disorienting impact of losing GME's formal supports and structures. They articulated that patient care trumped learning as their top priority. They lamented having limited insight into their learning needs (e.g. little feedback data) and so resorted to engaging in CPD activities that were readily at hand—but not necessarily relevant—and to finding learning resources that might not be formally recognised for CPD credit.ConclusionsPhysicians' learning journeys post‐GME are challenging, and the systems created to support that learning are ill equipped to meet the needs of physicians transitioning from GME to CPD. To encourage meaningful learning, the complex interplay of factors impeding CPD engagement should inform future innovations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生的终身学习之旅:持续专业发展奋斗历程的叙事分析
导言尽管持续专业发展(CPD)的开发者和教育者做出了不懈努力,但医生参与持续专业发展仍充满挑战。研究表明,这些教育干预措施以及规定这些干预措施的专业能力维护系统往往被参与者视为不切实际、脱离实际和应付检查的活动。本研究探讨了医生在继续医学教育(CPD)过程中学习毕业后医学教育(GME)培训的情况,以了解他们如何(a)将自己视为学习者,以及(b)在其职业生涯中参与终身学习。方法我们采用社会建构主义取向下的叙事探究和整体叙事分析方法,对来自大型儿童医院网络(包括学术医院、社区医院和初级保健实践)的医生进行了个别访谈。我们使用时间轴和故事弧线来支持叙事分析的再叙事。我们发现,在参与者的再叙事中,有三个值得注意的挑战尤为突出:(i) 从 "火车 "到 "水上漂",(ii) 学习退居二线,(iii) 通过觅食或狩猎和采集来学习。学员们描述了从普通教育到持续专业发展学习转变过程中的重大变化。虽然与会者认为自己是学习者,但他们描述了失去普通教育和培训的正式支持和结构所带来的迷失方向的影响。他们明确表示,病人护理比学习更重要。他们感叹自己对学习需求的了解有限(例如反馈数据很少),因此只能参加手头的持续专业发展活动--但不一定是相关的--以及寻找可能不被正式认可为持续专业发展学分的学习资源。为了鼓励有意义的学习,未来的创新应考虑到阻碍继续医学教育参与的各种因素的复杂相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
期刊最新文献
Being the supervisor: A duo-ethnographic exploration of social justice in postgraduate health professions education. Epistemic injustice: The hidden vulnerability of medicine. Fostering the clinician as teacher: A realist review. Issue Information August in this issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1