Assessment of Laws of the Wall During Flame–Wall Interaction of Premixed Flames Within Turbulent Boundary Layers

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 MECHANICS Flow, Turbulence and Combustion Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI:10.1007/s10494-024-00541-7
Umair Ahmed, Sanjeev Kr. Ghai, Nilanjan Chakraborty
{"title":"Assessment of Laws of the Wall During Flame–Wall Interaction of Premixed Flames Within Turbulent Boundary Layers","authors":"Umair Ahmed, Sanjeev Kr. Ghai, Nilanjan Chakraborty","doi":"10.1007/s10494-024-00541-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The validity of the usual laws of the wall for Favre mean values of the streamwise velocity component and temperature for non-reacting flows has been assessed for turbulent premixed flame-wall interaction using Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) data. Two different DNS databases corresponding to friction velocity-based Reynolds number of 110 and 180 representing unsteady head-on quenching of statistically planar flames within turbulent boundary layers have been considered. The usual log-law based expressions for the Favre mean values of the streamwise velocity and temperature for the inertial layer have been found to be inadequate at capturing the corresponding variations obtained from DNS data. The underlying assumptions of constant shear stress and the equilibrium of production and dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy underpinning the derivation of the usual log-law for the mean streamwise velocity have been found to be rendered invalid within the usual inertial layer during flame-wall interaction for both cases considered here. The heat flux does not remain constant within the usual inertial layer, and the turbulent flux of temperature exhibits counter-gradient transport within the so-called inertial layer for the cases considered in this work. These render the assumptions behind the derivation of the usual log-law for temperature to be invalid for application to turbulent flame-wall interaction. It has been found that previously proposed empirical modifications to the existing laws of the wall, which account for density and kinematic viscosity variations with temperature, do not significantly improve the agreement with the corresponding DNS data in the inertial layer and the inaccurate approximations for the kinematic viscosity compensated wall normal distance and the density compensated streamwise velocity component contribute to this disagreement. The DNS data has been utilised here to propose new expressions for the kinematic viscosity compensated wall normal distance and the density compensated streamwise velocity component, which upon using in the empirically modified law of wall expressions have been demonstrated to provide reasonable agreement with DNS data.</p>","PeriodicalId":559,"journal":{"name":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-024-00541-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The validity of the usual laws of the wall for Favre mean values of the streamwise velocity component and temperature for non-reacting flows has been assessed for turbulent premixed flame-wall interaction using Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) data. Two different DNS databases corresponding to friction velocity-based Reynolds number of 110 and 180 representing unsteady head-on quenching of statistically planar flames within turbulent boundary layers have been considered. The usual log-law based expressions for the Favre mean values of the streamwise velocity and temperature for the inertial layer have been found to be inadequate at capturing the corresponding variations obtained from DNS data. The underlying assumptions of constant shear stress and the equilibrium of production and dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy underpinning the derivation of the usual log-law for the mean streamwise velocity have been found to be rendered invalid within the usual inertial layer during flame-wall interaction for both cases considered here. The heat flux does not remain constant within the usual inertial layer, and the turbulent flux of temperature exhibits counter-gradient transport within the so-called inertial layer for the cases considered in this work. These render the assumptions behind the derivation of the usual log-law for temperature to be invalid for application to turbulent flame-wall interaction. It has been found that previously proposed empirical modifications to the existing laws of the wall, which account for density and kinematic viscosity variations with temperature, do not significantly improve the agreement with the corresponding DNS data in the inertial layer and the inaccurate approximations for the kinematic viscosity compensated wall normal distance and the density compensated streamwise velocity component contribute to this disagreement. The DNS data has been utilised here to propose new expressions for the kinematic viscosity compensated wall normal distance and the density compensated streamwise velocity component, which upon using in the empirically modified law of wall expressions have been demonstrated to provide reasonable agreement with DNS data.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
湍流边界层内预混合火焰与壁面相互作用过程中的壁面法则评估
利用直接数值模拟(DNS)数据评估了非反应流的流向速度分量和温度的法夫尔平均值的通常壁面定律对湍流预混火焰-壁面相互作用的有效性。两种不同的 DNS 数据库分别对应于基于摩擦速度的雷诺数 110 和 180,代表了湍流边界层内统计平面火焰的非稳态迎面淬火。研究发现,惯性层流向速度和温度的法弗尔平均值的常用对数法表达式不足以捕捉 DNS 数据中的相应变化。在这里考虑的两种情况下,在焰壁相互作用过程中,惯性层内的恒定剪应力和湍流动能的产生与耗散平衡的基本假设被认为是无效的。在通常的惯性层内,热通量并不是保持不变的,而且在本研究中考虑的情况下,温度的湍流通量在所谓的惯性层内呈现反梯度传输。这使得推导通常温度对数定律的假设在应用于湍流焰壁相互作用时失效。研究发现,之前提出的对现有焰壁定律的经验性修改(考虑到密度和运动粘度随温度的变化)并不能显著改善与惯性层中相应 DNS 数据的一致性,而对运动粘度补偿焰壁法向距离和密度补偿流向速度分量的不精确近似也导致了这种分歧。本文利用 DNS 数据提出了运动粘度补偿壁面法向距离和密度补偿流向速度分量的新表达式,并将其用于根据经验修改的壁面定律表达式,结果表明这些表达式与 DNS 数据具有合理的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Flow, Turbulence and Combustion provides a global forum for the publication of original and innovative research results that contribute to the solution of fundamental and applied problems encountered in single-phase, multi-phase and reacting flows, in both idealized and real systems. The scope of coverage encompasses topics in fluid dynamics, scalar transport, multi-physics interactions and flow control. From time to time the journal publishes Special or Theme Issues featuring invited articles. Contributions may report research that falls within the broad spectrum of analytical, computational and experimental methods. This includes research conducted in academia, industry and a variety of environmental and geophysical sectors. Turbulence, transition and associated phenomena are expected to play a significant role in the majority of studies reported, although non-turbulent flows, typical of those in micro-devices, would be regarded as falling within the scope covered. The emphasis is on originality, timeliness, quality and thematic fit, as exemplified by the title of the journal and the qualifications described above. Relevance to real-world problems and industrial applications are regarded as strengths.
期刊最新文献
Spatial Averaging Effects in Adverse Pressure Gradient Turbulent Boundary Layers LES of Biomass Syngas Combustion in a Swirl Stabilised Burner: Model Validation and Predictions A Comparison of Evaluation Methodologies of the Fractal Dimension of Premixed Turbulent Flames in 2D and 3D Using Direct Numerical Simulation Data Instability Modes and Scaling Analysis During Electro-Hydro-Dynamic-Atomization: Theoretical and Experimental Study Assessment of Wall Modeling With Adverse Pressure Gradient for High Reynolds Number Separated Flows
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1