{"title":"Blowout and Blowoff Limits of Confined Coaxial Ammonia/Hydrogen/Nitrogen-Air Flames with Variable Ammonia Fraction","authors":"Rajneesh Yadav, R. Santhosh","doi":"10.1007/s10494-024-00624-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present experimental study reports first observations of stability, blowout, and blowoff characteristics of ammonia–hydrogen–nitrogen fuel blend flames with varying volumetric ammonia fractions (<span>\\({x}_{{NH}_{3}}\\)</span>) in a coaxial combustor. The <span>\\({x}_{{NH}_{3}}\\)</span> is varied from 20 to 80%. For flames of ammonia fraction equal to 70% (<span>\\({x}_{{NH}_{3}}=0.7\\)</span>), three types of flame transitions are observed within fuel flow Reynolds number (<span>\\({Re}_{f}\\)</span>) of 40–575 as a coflow Reynolds number (<span>\\({Re}_{a}\\)</span>) is increased in steps. Initially, the coflow air remains laminar and <span>\\({Re}_{a}\\)</span> is increased gradually from laminar to turbulent limit. Different flame stabilization modes are characterized as burner-attached and lifted flame. The flame extinction modes are classified as <i>lifted-blowoff</i>, <i>attached-blowoff</i> and <i>attached-blowout</i> types. These flame transitions and stabilization characteristics are shown to be similar to methane flames. However, the <i>flame height</i> and <i>liftoff height</i> are shown to be different. The flames of fuel blends with ammonia fraction less than or equal to 60% (<span>\\({x}_{{NH}_{3}}\\le 0.6\\)</span>) are shown to behave fundamentally different from that of flames with <span>\\({x}_{{NH}_{3}}>0.6\\)</span> (and also methane flames). Specifically, within the tested <span>\\({Re}_{f}\\)</span> range, only one type of flame transition is observed as <span>\\({Re}_{a}\\)</span> is systematically varied in the former as compared to three types observed in the latter. Also, with a decrease in ammonia fraction (and a corresponding increase in hydrogen percentage), the <i>liftoff limit</i>, <i>reattachment limit</i>, and <i>blowout limits</i> all are observed to increase. The effect of ammonia composition on <i>flame height</i> and <i>liftoff height</i> is also elaborated. The present study also provides empirical correlations (particularly for the low power flames) for predicting <i>blowout</i> and <i>blowoff limits</i> in both lifted and attached conditions for ammonia-hydrogen–nitrogen fuel blend flames.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":559,"journal":{"name":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","volume":"114 2","pages":"527 - 560"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10494-024-00624-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The present experimental study reports first observations of stability, blowout, and blowoff characteristics of ammonia–hydrogen–nitrogen fuel blend flames with varying volumetric ammonia fractions (\({x}_{{NH}_{3}}\)) in a coaxial combustor. The \({x}_{{NH}_{3}}\) is varied from 20 to 80%. For flames of ammonia fraction equal to 70% (\({x}_{{NH}_{3}}=0.7\)), three types of flame transitions are observed within fuel flow Reynolds number (\({Re}_{f}\)) of 40–575 as a coflow Reynolds number (\({Re}_{a}\)) is increased in steps. Initially, the coflow air remains laminar and \({Re}_{a}\) is increased gradually from laminar to turbulent limit. Different flame stabilization modes are characterized as burner-attached and lifted flame. The flame extinction modes are classified as lifted-blowoff, attached-blowoff and attached-blowout types. These flame transitions and stabilization characteristics are shown to be similar to methane flames. However, the flame height and liftoff height are shown to be different. The flames of fuel blends with ammonia fraction less than or equal to 60% (\({x}_{{NH}_{3}}\le 0.6\)) are shown to behave fundamentally different from that of flames with \({x}_{{NH}_{3}}>0.6\) (and also methane flames). Specifically, within the tested \({Re}_{f}\) range, only one type of flame transition is observed as \({Re}_{a}\) is systematically varied in the former as compared to three types observed in the latter. Also, with a decrease in ammonia fraction (and a corresponding increase in hydrogen percentage), the liftoff limit, reattachment limit, and blowout limits all are observed to increase. The effect of ammonia composition on flame height and liftoff height is also elaborated. The present study also provides empirical correlations (particularly for the low power flames) for predicting blowout and blowoff limits in both lifted and attached conditions for ammonia-hydrogen–nitrogen fuel blend flames.
期刊介绍:
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion provides a global forum for the publication of original and innovative research results that contribute to the solution of fundamental and applied problems encountered in single-phase, multi-phase and reacting flows, in both idealized and real systems. The scope of coverage encompasses topics in fluid dynamics, scalar transport, multi-physics interactions and flow control. From time to time the journal publishes Special or Theme Issues featuring invited articles.
Contributions may report research that falls within the broad spectrum of analytical, computational and experimental methods. This includes research conducted in academia, industry and a variety of environmental and geophysical sectors. Turbulence, transition and associated phenomena are expected to play a significant role in the majority of studies reported, although non-turbulent flows, typical of those in micro-devices, would be regarded as falling within the scope covered. The emphasis is on originality, timeliness, quality and thematic fit, as exemplified by the title of the journal and the qualifications described above. Relevance to real-world problems and industrial applications are regarded as strengths.