Restoring stone and dominant grass species cover in a Mediterranean grassland: 20‐year effects on soil, vegetation, and arthropod communities

IF 2.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Restoration Ecology Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1111/rec.14153
Léa Saby, Elise Buisson, Olivier Blight, Christel Vidaller, Thierry Dutoit
{"title":"Restoring stone and dominant grass species cover in a Mediterranean grassland: 20‐year effects on soil, vegetation, and arthropod communities","authors":"Léa Saby, Elise Buisson, Olivier Blight, Christel Vidaller, Thierry Dutoit","doi":"10.1111/rec.14153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Long‐term studies are needed to monitor recovery following restoration, as it may take decades or even centuries, particularly in the case of Mediterranean dry grasslands, for communities to reach their former equilibrium before the degradation occurred. A multi‐component approach is also needed to evaluate restoration success and better understand the complex impacts of former restoration projects on present‐day ecological interactions and ecosystem functions. The objective of this study was to address the restoration of a Mediterranean grassland in southern France, 20 years after implementation. Particularly, we examine the long‐term impact on soil, vegetation, and arthropods of the reintroduction of a dominant grass species (<jats:italic>Brachypodium retusum</jats:italic>) and the restoration of the natural stone cover on a degraded former cultivated field. Soil analyses revealed that reestablishing stone cover only slightly acidified the soil, while <jats:italic>B. retusum</jats:italic> presence enhanced soil fertility. <jats:italic>Brachypodium retusum</jats:italic> also decreased the nutritional value of forage and increased plant biomass and litter. Plant composition shifted with treatments: <jats:italic>B. retusum</jats:italic> and stone cover favored xeromesophilous species, while <jats:italic>B. retusum</jats:italic> alone encouraged less palatable species. The soil seed bank composition and abundance were positively influenced by stone cover but negatively impacted by <jats:italic>B. retusum</jats:italic> reintroduction. Negative outcomes on some arthropods and mesofauna were measured in treatments with both <jats:italic>B. retusum</jats:italic> and stones, except for Acari, which were positively impacted by the presence of stones. The findings emphasize that <jats:italic>B. retusum</jats:italic> is an ecological engineer with complex effects on the different ecosystem components.","PeriodicalId":54487,"journal":{"name":"Restoration Ecology","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restoration Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14153","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Long‐term studies are needed to monitor recovery following restoration, as it may take decades or even centuries, particularly in the case of Mediterranean dry grasslands, for communities to reach their former equilibrium before the degradation occurred. A multi‐component approach is also needed to evaluate restoration success and better understand the complex impacts of former restoration projects on present‐day ecological interactions and ecosystem functions. The objective of this study was to address the restoration of a Mediterranean grassland in southern France, 20 years after implementation. Particularly, we examine the long‐term impact on soil, vegetation, and arthropods of the reintroduction of a dominant grass species (Brachypodium retusum) and the restoration of the natural stone cover on a degraded former cultivated field. Soil analyses revealed that reestablishing stone cover only slightly acidified the soil, while B. retusum presence enhanced soil fertility. Brachypodium retusum also decreased the nutritional value of forage and increased plant biomass and litter. Plant composition shifted with treatments: B. retusum and stone cover favored xeromesophilous species, while B. retusum alone encouraged less palatable species. The soil seed bank composition and abundance were positively influenced by stone cover but negatively impacted by B. retusum reintroduction. Negative outcomes on some arthropods and mesofauna were measured in treatments with both B. retusum and stones, except for Acari, which were positively impacted by the presence of stones. The findings emphasize that B. retusum is an ecological engineer with complex effects on the different ecosystem components.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恢复地中海草地的石块和优势草种覆盖:20 年来对土壤、植被和节肢动物群落的影响
需要进行长期研究来监测恢复后的恢复情况,因为群落可能需要几十年甚至几百年的时间才能达到退化前的平衡状态,特别是在地中海干旱草原上。此外,还需要一种多成分方法来评估恢复是否成功,并更好地了解以前的恢复项目对当今生态互动和生态系统功能的复杂影响。本研究旨在探讨法国南部地中海草原实施 20 年后的恢复情况。特别是,我们研究了在退化的前耕地上重新引入优势草种(Brachypodium retusum)和恢复天然石块覆盖对土壤、植被和节肢动物的长期影响。土壤分析表明,恢复石块覆盖仅使土壤轻微酸化,而禾本科植物的存在则提高了土壤肥力。网纹草还降低了牧草的营养价值,增加了植物生物量和废弃物。植物组成随处理而变化:网纹草和石块覆盖有利于嗜干旱物种,而仅网纹草则有利于适口性较低的物种。土壤种子库的组成和丰度受到石块覆盖的积极影响,但受到重新引入网纹草的消极影响。同时使用网纹草和石头的处理对一些节肢动物和中型动物产生了负面影响,但蛔虫除外,因为石头的存在对蛔虫产生了积极影响。研究结果表明,网纹石是一种生态工程师,对生态系统的不同组成部分具有复杂的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Restoration Ecology
Restoration Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
15.60%
发文量
226
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Restoration Ecology fosters the exchange of ideas among the many disciplines involved with ecological restoration. Addressing global concerns and communicating them to the international research community and restoration practitioners, the journal is at the forefront of a vital new direction in science, ecology, and policy. Original papers describe experimental, observational, and theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine, and freshwater systems, and are considered without taxonomic bias. Contributions span the natural sciences, including ecological and biological aspects, as well as the restoration of soil, air and water when set in an ecological context; and the social sciences, including cultural, philosophical, political, educational, economic and historical aspects. Edited by a distinguished panel, the journal continues to be a major conduit for researchers to publish their findings in the fight to not only halt ecological damage, but also to ultimately reverse it.
期刊最新文献
How does restoration ecology consider climate change uncertainties in forested ecosystems? Does decline and recovery process affect clonal and genetic diversity of a coastal plant population? Salt tolerance of native trees relevant to the restoration of degraded landscapes in the Monte region, Argentina Frequency of association: a key indicator for assessing livestock grazing effects on dryland plant interactions, applicable in restoration Low retention of restocked laboratory‐reared long‐spined sea urchins Diadema antillarum due to Spanish hogfish Bodianus rufus predation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1