The Effect of Spatial Scale on the Prediction of Tropical Forest Attributes from Image Texture

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences International Journal of Forestry Research Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.1155/2024/7178211
J. A. Gallardo-Cruz, J. V. Solórzano, Edgar J. González, J. Meave
{"title":"The Effect of Spatial Scale on the Prediction of Tropical Forest Attributes from Image Texture","authors":"J. A. Gallardo-Cruz, J. V. Solórzano, Edgar J. González, J. Meave","doi":"10.1155/2024/7178211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The availability of high-resolution satellite imagery has boosted the modelling of tropical forest attributes based on texture metrics derived from grey-level co-occurrence matrices (GLCMs). This procedure has shown that GLCM metrics are good predictors of vegetation attributes. Nonetheless, the procedure is also sensitive to the scale of analysis (image resolution and plot size). This study aimed to analyse the effect of spatial scale on the modelling of forest attributes, and to provide some ecological insight into such effect. Nineteen 32 × 32 m sampling plots were used to quantify forest structure (basal area: BA; mean height: H; standard deviation of height, HSD; density, D; and aboveground biomass, AGB). The 19 plots were subdivided into four 16 × 16 m, one of which was subdivided into four 8 × 8 m plots. To match this design, 12 GLCM metrics were calculated from a GeoEye-1 image (pixel size ≤ 2 m) using a 5-, 9-, and 21-pixel window from the R, NIR, NDVI, and EVI bands. For each of the windows, we modelled the five structural variables as linear combinations of the 12 metrics through linear models. The modelling potential ranged from high (R2 = 0.70) to low (0.11). H was the best-predicted attribute; this occurred at the smallest scale, with increasing scales producing lower R2 values. The second best-predicted attribute was HSD, which peaked at the intermediate scale. D and AGB displayed a similar pattern. BA was the only attribute best predicted at the largest scale. Thus, in predicting tropical forest attributes from GLCM-derived texture metrics, the spatial scale to be used should reflect the spatial scale at which ecological processes occur. Therefore, understanding how ecological processes express themselves in a remotely sensed image becomes a critical task.","PeriodicalId":14099,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Forestry Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Forestry Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/7178211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The availability of high-resolution satellite imagery has boosted the modelling of tropical forest attributes based on texture metrics derived from grey-level co-occurrence matrices (GLCMs). This procedure has shown that GLCM metrics are good predictors of vegetation attributes. Nonetheless, the procedure is also sensitive to the scale of analysis (image resolution and plot size). This study aimed to analyse the effect of spatial scale on the modelling of forest attributes, and to provide some ecological insight into such effect. Nineteen 32 × 32 m sampling plots were used to quantify forest structure (basal area: BA; mean height: H; standard deviation of height, HSD; density, D; and aboveground biomass, AGB). The 19 plots were subdivided into four 16 × 16 m, one of which was subdivided into four 8 × 8 m plots. To match this design, 12 GLCM metrics were calculated from a GeoEye-1 image (pixel size ≤ 2 m) using a 5-, 9-, and 21-pixel window from the R, NIR, NDVI, and EVI bands. For each of the windows, we modelled the five structural variables as linear combinations of the 12 metrics through linear models. The modelling potential ranged from high (R2 = 0.70) to low (0.11). H was the best-predicted attribute; this occurred at the smallest scale, with increasing scales producing lower R2 values. The second best-predicted attribute was HSD, which peaked at the intermediate scale. D and AGB displayed a similar pattern. BA was the only attribute best predicted at the largest scale. Thus, in predicting tropical forest attributes from GLCM-derived texture metrics, the spatial scale to be used should reflect the spatial scale at which ecological processes occur. Therefore, understanding how ecological processes express themselves in a remotely sensed image becomes a critical task.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
空间尺度对从图像纹理预测热带森林属性的影响
高分辨率卫星图像的可用性促进了根据灰度级共现矩阵(GLCM)得出的纹理度量建立热带森林属性模型的工作。该程序表明,GLCM 指标可以很好地预测植被属性。不过,该程序对分析尺度(图像分辨率和地块大小)也很敏感。本研究旨在分析空间尺度对森林属性建模的影响,并就这种影响提供一些生态学见解。研究使用了 19 个 32 × 32 米的取样小块来量化森林结构(基部面积:BA;平均高度:H;标准偏差:M):BA;平均高度:H;高度标准偏差:HSD;密度:D;地上生物量:AGB)。19 个地块被细分为 4 个 16 × 16 米的地块,其中一个地块又被细分为 4 个 8 × 8 米的地块。为了与这一设计相匹配,我们从 GeoEye-1 图像(像素大小 ≤ 2 米)中使用 5、9 和 21 像素窗口计算了 12 个 GLCM 指标,这些窗口来自 R、NIR、NDVI 和 EVI 波段。对于每个窗口,我们通过线性模型将五个结构变量模拟为 12 个指标的线性组合。建模潜力从高(R2 = 0.70)到低(0.11)不等。H 是预测效果最好的属性;这发生在最小的尺度上,尺度越大,R2 值越低。第二个最佳预测属性是 HSD,它在中间比例尺上达到峰值。D 和 AGB 显示了类似的模式。BA 是唯一一个在最大尺度上达到最佳预测效果的属性。因此,在从 GLCM 派生的纹理指标预测热带森林属性时,使用的空间尺度应反映生态过程发生的空间尺度。因此,了解生态过程如何在遥感图像中表现出来成为一项关键任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Forestry Research
International Journal of Forestry Research Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Forestry Research is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research and review articles focusing on the management and conservation of trees or forests. The journal will consider articles looking at areas such as tree biodiversity, sustainability, and habitat protection, as well as social and economic aspects of forestry. Other topics covered include landscape protection, productive capacity, and forest health.
期刊最新文献
Contribution of Fuel Wood Income from Natural Forests to Household Economy in Delanta District, Northeastern Ethiopia Comparative Analysis of Impact of Soil Mixture and Fertilization on Growth and Seedling Quality of Selected Agroforestry Tree Species Determinants of Farmers’ Perceptions towards Socioecological Benefits of Agroforestry Practices in Northwestern Ethiopia The Effect of Spatial Scale on the Prediction of Tropical Forest Attributes from Image Texture Exploring the Therapeutic Potential of Amburana cearensis: A Scientometric Study on an Endangered Medicinal Tree
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1