The Future of Energy Storage in Vietnam: A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Metal-Ion Battery Assessments

IF 4.6 4区 化学 Q2 ELECTROCHEMISTRY Batteries Pub Date : 2024-04-14 DOI:10.3390/batteries10040130
Chia-Nan Wang, Nhat-Luong Nhieu, Yen-Hui Wang
{"title":"The Future of Energy Storage in Vietnam: A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Metal-Ion Battery Assessments","authors":"Chia-Nan Wang, Nhat-Luong Nhieu, Yen-Hui Wang","doi":"10.3390/batteries10040130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries, despite their prevalence, face issues of resource scarcity and environmental concerns, prompting the search for alternative technologies. This study addresses the need to assess and identify viable metal-ion battery alternatives to Li-ion batteries, focusing on the rapidly industrializing context of Vietnam. It acknowledges the criticality of developing a sustainable, cost-effective, and resource-efficient energy storage solution that aligns with the country’s growth trajectory. The primary objective is to evaluate the suitability of emerging metal-ion batteries—specifically sodium-ion (SIB), sodium-ion saltwater (SIB-S), magnesium-ion (MIB), and zinc-ion (ZIB)—for Vietnam’s energy storage needs, guiding future investment and policy decisions. A Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach is employed, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative criteria. This study utilizes the Fuzzy Best-Worst Method (BWM) to determine the relative importance of various performance indicators and then applies the Bonferroni Fuzzy Combined Compromise Solution (Bonferroni FCoCoSo) method to rank the battery alternatives. The SIBs emerged as the most promising alternative, scoring the highest in the overall evaluation. The MIBs and SIB-saltwater batteries displayed competitive potential, while the ZIBs ranked the lowest among the considered options. This research provides a strategic framework for energy policy formulation and investment prioritization. It contributes to the field by applying a fuzzy-based MCDM approach in a novel context and offers a structured comparative analysis of metal-ion batteries, enhancing the body of knowledge on sustainable energy storage technologies.","PeriodicalId":8755,"journal":{"name":"Batteries","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Batteries","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries10040130","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ELECTROCHEMISTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries, despite their prevalence, face issues of resource scarcity and environmental concerns, prompting the search for alternative technologies. This study addresses the need to assess and identify viable metal-ion battery alternatives to Li-ion batteries, focusing on the rapidly industrializing context of Vietnam. It acknowledges the criticality of developing a sustainable, cost-effective, and resource-efficient energy storage solution that aligns with the country’s growth trajectory. The primary objective is to evaluate the suitability of emerging metal-ion batteries—specifically sodium-ion (SIB), sodium-ion saltwater (SIB-S), magnesium-ion (MIB), and zinc-ion (ZIB)—for Vietnam’s energy storage needs, guiding future investment and policy decisions. A Fuzzy Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) approach is employed, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative criteria. This study utilizes the Fuzzy Best-Worst Method (BWM) to determine the relative importance of various performance indicators and then applies the Bonferroni Fuzzy Combined Compromise Solution (Bonferroni FCoCoSo) method to rank the battery alternatives. The SIBs emerged as the most promising alternative, scoring the highest in the overall evaluation. The MIBs and SIB-saltwater batteries displayed competitive potential, while the ZIBs ranked the lowest among the considered options. This research provides a strategic framework for energy policy formulation and investment prioritization. It contributes to the field by applying a fuzzy-based MCDM approach in a novel context and offers a structured comparative analysis of metal-ion batteries, enhancing the body of knowledge on sustainable energy storage technologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
越南储能的未来:金属离子电池评估的模糊多标准决策方法
锂离子(Li-ion)电池尽管普遍存在,但却面临着资源稀缺和环境问题,这促使人们寻找替代技术。本研究以快速工业化的越南为重点,探讨评估和确定锂离子电池的可行金属离子电池替代品的必要性。本研究认识到,开发一种可持续、具有成本效益和资源效率的能源存储解决方案至关重要,它应与越南的发展轨迹保持一致。主要目标是评估新兴金属离子电池--特别是钠离子电池(SIB)、钠离子盐水电池(SIB-S)、镁离子电池(MIB)和锌离子电池(ZIB)--是否适合越南的储能需求,为未来的投资和政策决策提供指导。本研究采用了模糊多标准决策(MCDM)方法,同时纳入了定量和定性标准。本研究利用模糊最佳-最差法(BWM)来确定各种性能指标的相对重要性,然后应用 Bonferroni 模糊综合折衷方案(Bonferroni FCoCoSo)法对电池备选方案进行排序。SIB 是最有前途的替代方案,在总体评估中得分最高。MIBs和SIB-盐水电池显示出了竞争潜力,而ZIBs在所考虑的备选方案中排名最低。这项研究为能源政策的制定和投资优先级的确定提供了一个战略框架。它在新颖的背景下应用了基于模糊的 MCDM 方法,为该领域做出了贡献,并提供了金属离子电池的结构化比较分析,增强了可持续能源存储技术的知识体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Batteries
Batteries Energy-Energy Engineering and Power Technology
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
15.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Copper Wire Resistance Corrosion Test for Assessing Copper Compatibility of E-Thermal Fluids for Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) Advancements and Challenges in Perovskite-Based Photo-Induced Rechargeable Batteries and Supercapacitors: A Comparative Review A Physics–Guided Machine Learning Approach for Capacity Fading Mechanism Detection and Fading Rate Prediction Using Early Cycle Data A Deep Learning Approach for Online State of Health Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries Using Partial Constant Current Charging Curves Low-Temperature-Tolerant Aqueous Proton Battery with Porous Ti3C2Tx MXene Electrode and Phosphoric Acid Electrolyte
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1