Anti-Muslim policy preferences and boundaries of American identity across partisanship

Nazita Lajevardi, Kassra A. R. Oskooii
{"title":"Anti-Muslim policy preferences and boundaries of American identity across partisanship","authors":"Nazita Lajevardi, Kassra A. R. Oskooii","doi":"10.1017/s0143814x24000060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Does American identity predict preferences for anti-democratic policies that aim to marginalize Muslim Americans? Absent significant priming of inclusive elements of American identity, we argue that individuals with stronger attachments to American identity will be less likely than their counterparts to reject a range of anti-Muslim policies that are antithetical to principles of religious liberty and equality. Across three surveys and multiple measures, American identity powerfully predicts preferences for curbing the civil liberties of Muslim citizens. Particularly striking is the finding that the effect of American identity spans the partisan divide; it consistently explains the endorsement of exclusionary policies among self-identified Democrats, who typically hold more progressive policy positions toward minority groups than Republicans. Overall, our study highlights the contradictory and exclusionary nature of American identity, which has important implications for minority groups constructed as outside the boundaries of Americanness.","PeriodicalId":506680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Policy","volume":"8 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x24000060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Does American identity predict preferences for anti-democratic policies that aim to marginalize Muslim Americans? Absent significant priming of inclusive elements of American identity, we argue that individuals with stronger attachments to American identity will be less likely than their counterparts to reject a range of anti-Muslim policies that are antithetical to principles of religious liberty and equality. Across three surveys and multiple measures, American identity powerfully predicts preferences for curbing the civil liberties of Muslim citizens. Particularly striking is the finding that the effect of American identity spans the partisan divide; it consistently explains the endorsement of exclusionary policies among self-identified Democrats, who typically hold more progressive policy positions toward minority groups than Republicans. Overall, our study highlights the contradictory and exclusionary nature of American identity, which has important implications for minority groups constructed as outside the boundaries of Americanness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
跨党派的反穆斯林政策偏好和美国身份认同的界限
美国身份认同能否预测人们对旨在排挤美国穆斯林的反民主政策的偏好?我们认为,如果美国身份认同中的包容性元素没有明显的影响,那么对美国身份认同有较强依恋的人将比他们的同类人更不可能拒绝一系列反穆斯林政策,这些政策与宗教自由和平等原则背道而驰。在三项调查和多种衡量标准中,美国身份认同有力地预测了对限制穆斯林公民公民自由的偏好。尤其令人震惊的是,我们发现美国身份认同的影响跨越了党派分歧;它始终如一地解释了自我认同的民主党人对排斥性政策的认可,而民主党人通常比共和党人对少数群体持有更进步的政策立场。总之,我们的研究凸显了美国身份认同的矛盾性和排斥性,这对被视为美国性界限之外的少数群体具有重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
When incumbents successfully retrench big and popular social policies: policy design matters – CORRIGENDUM Why do citizens support algorithmic government? Delegating legislative powers to the European Commission: the threat of non-compliance with tertiary legislation in the member states Anti-Muslim policy preferences and boundaries of American identity across partisanship How is the path produced and sustained? Path-dependent college education expansion and underlying liberal rule in Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1