Why do citizens support algorithmic government?

Dario Sidhu, Beatrice Magistro, Benjamin Allen Stevens, P. Loewen
{"title":"Why do citizens support algorithmic government?","authors":"Dario Sidhu, Beatrice Magistro, Benjamin Allen Stevens, P. Loewen","doi":"10.1017/s0143814x24000114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n As governments increasingly adopt algorithms and artificial intelligence (AAI), we still know comparatively little about citizens’ support for algorithmic government. In this paper, we analyze how many and what kind of reasons for government use of AAI citizens support. We use a sample of 17,000 respondents from 16 OECD countries and find that opinions on algorithmic government are divided. A narrow majority of people (55.6%) support a majority of reasons for using algorithmic government, and this is relatively consistent across countries. Results from multilevel models suggest that most of the cross-country variation is explained by individual-level characteristics, including age, education, gender, and income. Older and more educated respondents are more accepting of algorithmic government, while female and low-income respondents are less supportive. Finally, we classify the reasons for using algorithmic government into two types, “fairness” and “efficiency,” and find that support for them varies based on individuals’ political attitudes.","PeriodicalId":506680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Policy","volume":"17 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x24000114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As governments increasingly adopt algorithms and artificial intelligence (AAI), we still know comparatively little about citizens’ support for algorithmic government. In this paper, we analyze how many and what kind of reasons for government use of AAI citizens support. We use a sample of 17,000 respondents from 16 OECD countries and find that opinions on algorithmic government are divided. A narrow majority of people (55.6%) support a majority of reasons for using algorithmic government, and this is relatively consistent across countries. Results from multilevel models suggest that most of the cross-country variation is explained by individual-level characteristics, including age, education, gender, and income. Older and more educated respondents are more accepting of algorithmic government, while female and low-income respondents are less supportive. Finally, we classify the reasons for using algorithmic government into two types, “fairness” and “efficiency,” and find that support for them varies based on individuals’ political attitudes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为什么公民支持算法政府?
随着政府越来越多地采用算法和人工智能(AAI),我们对公民对算法政府的支持仍然知之甚少。在本文中,我们分析了公民支持政府使用 AAI 的数量和原因。我们使用了来自 16 个经合组织国家的 17000 个受访者样本,发现人们对算法政府的看法存在分歧。只有极少数人(55.6%)支持使用算法政府的大多数理由,而且各国的情况相对一致。多层次模型的结果表明,大部分国家间的差异是由个人层面的特征(包括年龄、教育程度、性别和收入)造成的。年龄越大、受教育程度越高的受访者对算法政府的接受度越高,而女性和低收入受访者对算法政府的支持度较低。最后,我们将使用算法政府的原因分为 "公平 "和 "效率 "两类,并发现对这两类原因的支持因个人的政治态度而异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
When incumbents successfully retrench big and popular social policies: policy design matters – CORRIGENDUM Why do citizens support algorithmic government? Delegating legislative powers to the European Commission: the threat of non-compliance with tertiary legislation in the member states Anti-Muslim policy preferences and boundaries of American identity across partisanship How is the path produced and sustained? Path-dependent college education expansion and underlying liberal rule in Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1