A comparison of onshore oil and gas transmission pipeline incident statistics in Canada and the United States

IF 4.1 3区工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection Pub Date : 2024-04-20 DOI:10.1016/j.ijcip.2024.100679

Y. Shen, W. Zhou

{"title":"A comparison of onshore oil and gas transmission pipeline incident statistics in Canada and the United States","authors":"Y. Shen, W. Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcip.2024.100679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>This study analyzes the mileage and incident data between 1995 and 2016 corresponding to the onshore oil and natural gas transmission pipelines regulated by the Canada Energy Regulator (CER) and Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) of the United States. The analysis indicates that the material/weld/equipment failure is the leading failure cause for both CER and PHMSA pipeline incidents. The annual average incident rates of the CER and PHMSA pipelines are in the order of 10−3 per km except for the PHMSA gas pipelines, the annual incident rate of which is in the order of 10−4 per km. The annual average rupture rates of the CER and PHMSA pipelines vary from 3.5 × 10−5 to 4.5 × 10−5 per km. The F-N curves for the PHMSA pipelines are developed based on the mileage and incident data to quantify the societal risks posed by the pipeline in general.</div>","PeriodicalId":49057,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100679"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874548224000209/pdfft?md5=eddf33d8e539f2a2af96e60537f15885&pid=1-s2.0-S1874548224000209-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1874548224000209","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyzes the mileage and incident data between 1995 and 2016 corresponding to the onshore oil and natural gas transmission pipelines regulated by the Canada Energy Regulator (CER) and Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) of the United States. The analysis indicates that the material/weld/equipment failure is the leading failure cause for both CER and PHMSA pipeline incidents. The annual average incident rates of the CER and PHMSA pipelines are in the order of 10⁻³ per km except for the PHMSA gas pipelines, the annual incident rate of which is in the order of 10⁻⁴ per km. The annual average rupture rates of the CER and PHMSA pipelines vary from 3.5 × 10⁻⁵ to 4.5 × 10⁻⁵ per km. The F-N curves for the PHMSA pipelines are developed based on the mileage and incident data to quantify the societal risks posed by the pipeline in general.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

加拿大和美国陆上油气输送管道事故统计比较

本研究分析了 1995 年至 2016 年间由加拿大能源监管局（CER）和美国管道与危险材料安全管理局（PHMSA）监管的陆上石油和天然气输送管道的里程和事故数据。分析表明，材料/焊缝/设备故障是 CER 和 PHMSA 管道事故的主要故障原因。CER 和 PHMSA 管道的年平均事故率约为每公里 10-3，但 PHMSA 天然气管道除外，其年事故率约为每公里 10-4。CER 和 PHMSA 管道的年平均破裂率从每公里 3.5 × 10-5 到 4.5 × 10-5 不等。PHMSA 管道的 F-N 曲线是根据里程和事故数据绘制的，用于量化管道的总体社会风险。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

CiteScore

8.90

自引率

5.60%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection (IJCIP) was launched in 2008, with the primary aim of publishing scholarly papers of the highest quality in all areas of critical infrastructure protection. Of particular interest are articles that weave science, technology, law and policy to craft sophisticated yet practical solutions for securing assets in the various critical infrastructure sectors. These critical infrastructure sectors include: information technology, telecommunications, energy, banking and finance, transportation systems, chemicals, critical manufacturing, agriculture and food, defense industrial base, public health and health care, national monuments and icons, drinking water and water treatment systems, commercial facilities, dams, emergency services, nuclear reactors, materials and waste, postal and shipping, and government facilities. Protecting and ensuring the continuity of operation of critical infrastructure assets are vital to national security, public health and safety, economic vitality, and societal wellbeing. The scope of the journal includes, but is not limited to: 1. Analysis of security challenges that are unique or common to the various infrastructure sectors. 2. Identification of core security principles and techniques that can be applied to critical infrastructure protection. 3. Elucidation of the dependencies and interdependencies existing between infrastructure sectors and techniques for mitigating the devastating effects of cascading failures. 4. Creation of sophisticated, yet practical, solutions, for critical infrastructure protection that involve mathematical, scientific and engineering techniques, economic and social science methods, and/or legal and public policy constructs.