ASYMPTOTICALLY UNIFORMLY MOST POWERFUL TESTS FOR UNIT ROOTS IN GAUSSIAN PANELS WITH CROSS-SECTIONAL DEPENDENCE GENERATED BY COMMON FACTORS

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Econometric Theory Pub Date : 2024-04-29 DOI:10.1017/s0266466624000112
Oliver Wichert, I. Gaia Becheri, Feike C. Drost, Ramon van den Akker
{"title":"ASYMPTOTICALLY UNIFORMLY MOST POWERFUL TESTS FOR UNIT ROOTS IN GAUSSIAN PANELS WITH CROSS-SECTIONAL DEPENDENCE GENERATED BY COMMON FACTORS","authors":"Oliver Wichert, I. Gaia Becheri, Feike C. Drost, Ramon van den Akker","doi":"10.1017/s0266466624000112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper considers testing for unit roots in Gaussian panels with cross-sectional dependence generated by common factors. Within our setup, we can analyze restricted versions of the two prevalent approaches in the literature, that of Moon and Perron (2004, <span>Journal of Econometrics</span> 122, 81–126), who specify a factor model for the innovations, and the PANIC setup proposed in Bai and Ng (2004, <span>Econometrica</span> 72, 1127–1177), who test common factors and idiosyncratic deviations separately for unit roots. We show that both frameworks lead to locally asymptotically normal experiments with the <span>same</span> central sequence and Fisher information. Using Le Cam’s theory of statistical experiments, we obtain the local asymptotic power envelope for unit-root tests. We show that the popular Moon and Perron (2004, <span>Journal of Econometrics</span> 122, 81–126) and Bai and Ng (2010, <span>Econometric Theory</span> 26, 1088–1114) tests only attain the power envelope in case there is no heterogeneity in the long-run variance of the idiosyncratic components. We develop a new test which is asymptotically uniformly most powerful irrespective of possible heterogeneity in the long-run variance of the idiosyncratic components. Monte Carlo simulations corroborate our asymptotic results and document significant gains in finite-sample power if the variances of the idiosyncratic shocks differ substantially among the cross-sectional units.</p>","PeriodicalId":49275,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Theory","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Theory","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266466624000112","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper considers testing for unit roots in Gaussian panels with cross-sectional dependence generated by common factors. Within our setup, we can analyze restricted versions of the two prevalent approaches in the literature, that of Moon and Perron (2004, Journal of Econometrics 122, 81–126), who specify a factor model for the innovations, and the PANIC setup proposed in Bai and Ng (2004, Econometrica 72, 1127–1177), who test common factors and idiosyncratic deviations separately for unit roots. We show that both frameworks lead to locally asymptotically normal experiments with the same central sequence and Fisher information. Using Le Cam’s theory of statistical experiments, we obtain the local asymptotic power envelope for unit-root tests. We show that the popular Moon and Perron (2004, Journal of Econometrics 122, 81–126) and Bai and Ng (2010, Econometric Theory 26, 1088–1114) tests only attain the power envelope in case there is no heterogeneity in the long-run variance of the idiosyncratic components. We develop a new test which is asymptotically uniformly most powerful irrespective of possible heterogeneity in the long-run variance of the idiosyncratic components. Monte Carlo simulations corroborate our asymptotic results and document significant gains in finite-sample power if the variances of the idiosyncratic shocks differ substantially among the cross-sectional units.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
由共同因素产生横截面依赖性的高斯面板中单位根的渐近均匀最强检验
本文考虑在具有由共同因子产生的横截面依赖性的高斯面板中检验单位根。在我们的设置中,我们可以分析文献中两种流行方法的限制版本,一种是 Moon 和 Perron(2004,《计量经济学杂志》,122,81-126)的方法,他们为创新指定了一个因子模型;另一种是 Bai 和 Ng(2004,《计量经济学》,72,1127-1177)提出的 PANIC 设置,他们分别检验了公共因子和特异偏差的单位根。我们证明,这两种框架都会导致具有相同中心序列和费雪信息的局部渐近正态实验。利用 Le Cam 的统计实验理论,我们得到了单位根检验的局部渐近功率包络。我们发现,流行的 Moon 和 Perron(2004,《计量经济学杂志》,122,81-126)以及 Bai 和 Ng(2010,《计量经济学理论》,26,1088-1114)检验只有在特异性成分的长期方差不存在异质性的情况下才能达到功率包络。我们开发了一种新的检验方法,无论特立独行成分的长期方差是否存在异质性,该检验方法在渐近均匀性上都是最有力的。蒙特卡罗模拟证实了我们的渐近结果,并记录了如果特立独行冲击的方差在横截面单位之间存在巨大差异,则有限样本的力量会显著增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Econometric Theory
Econometric Theory MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception, Econometric Theory has aimed to endow econometrics with an innovative journal dedicated to advance theoretical research in econometrics. It provides a centralized professional outlet for original theoretical contributions in all of the major areas of econometrics, and all fields of research in econometric theory fall within the scope of ET. In addition, ET fosters the multidisciplinary features of econometrics that extend beyond economics. Particularly welcome are articles that promote original econometric research in relation to mathematical finance, stochastic processes, statistics, and probability theory, as well as computationally intensive areas of economics such as modern industrial organization and dynamic macroeconomics.
期刊最新文献
INFERENCE IN MILDLY EXPLOSIVE AUTOREGRESSIONS UNDER UNCONDITIONAL HETEROSKEDASTICITY EFFICIENCY IN ESTIMATION UNDER MONOTONIC ATTRITION WELFARE ANALYSIS VIA MARGINAL TREATMENT EFFECTS APPLICATIONS OF FUNCTIONAL DEPENDENCE TO SPATIAL ECONOMETRICS IDENTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL DECISION THEORY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1