A combined model using pre-treatment CT radiomics and clinicopathological features of non-small cell lung cancer to predict major pathological responses after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-05-04 DOI:10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2024.101098
Fang Wang , Hong Yang , Wujie Chen , Lei Ruan , Tingting Jiang , Lei Cheng , Haitao Jiang , Min Fang
{"title":"A combined model using pre-treatment CT radiomics and clinicopathological features of non-small cell lung cancer to predict major pathological responses after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy","authors":"Fang Wang ,&nbsp;Hong Yang ,&nbsp;Wujie Chen ,&nbsp;Lei Ruan ,&nbsp;Tingting Jiang ,&nbsp;Lei Cheng ,&nbsp;Haitao Jiang ,&nbsp;Min Fang","doi":"10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2024.101098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the relationship between clinical pathological characteristics, pretreatment CT radiomics, and major pathologic response (MPR) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, and to establish a combined model to predict the major pathologic response of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective study of 211 patients with NSCLC who underwent neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and surgical treatment from January 2019 to April 2021 was conducted. The patients were divided into two groups: the MPR group and the non-MPR group. Pre-treatment CT images were segmented using ITK SNAP software to extract radiomics features using Python software. Then a radiomics model, a clinical model, and a combined model were constructed and validated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Finally, Delong's test was used to compare the three models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.70 (95 % CI: 0.62-0.78) in the training group and 0.60 (95 % CI: 0.45-0.76) in the validation group. RECIST assessment results were screened from all clinical characteristics as independent factors for MPR with multivariate logistic regression analysis. The AUC of the clinical model for predicting MPR was 0.66 (95 % CI: 0.59-0.73) in the training group and 0.77 (95 % CI: 0.66-0.87) in the validation group. The combined model with combined radiomics and clinicopathological characteristics achieved an AUC was 0.76 (95 % CI: 0.68-0.84) in the training group, and 0.80 (95 % CI: 0.67-0.92) in the validation group. Delong's test showed that the AUC of the combined model was significantly higher than that of the radiomics model alone in both the training group (P = 0.0067) and the validation group (P = 0.0009).The calibration curve showed good agreement between predicted and actual MPR. Clinical decision curve analysis showed that the combined model was superior to radiomics alone.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Radiomics model can predict MPR in NSCLC after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with similar accuracy to RECIST assessment criteria. The combined model based on pretreatment CT radiomics and clinicopathological features showed better predictive power than independent radiomics model or independent clinicopathological features, suggesting that it may be more useful for guiding personalized neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy treatment strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 101098"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147027224000394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the relationship between clinical pathological characteristics, pretreatment CT radiomics, and major pathologic response (MPR) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, and to establish a combined model to predict the major pathologic response of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

Methods

A retrospective study of 211 patients with NSCLC who underwent neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy and surgical treatment from January 2019 to April 2021 was conducted. The patients were divided into two groups: the MPR group and the non-MPR group. Pre-treatment CT images were segmented using ITK SNAP software to extract radiomics features using Python software. Then a radiomics model, a clinical model, and a combined model were constructed and validated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Finally, Delong's test was used to compare the three models.

Results

The radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.70 (95 % CI: 0.62-0.78) in the training group and 0.60 (95 % CI: 0.45-0.76) in the validation group. RECIST assessment results were screened from all clinical characteristics as independent factors for MPR with multivariate logistic regression analysis. The AUC of the clinical model for predicting MPR was 0.66 (95 % CI: 0.59-0.73) in the training group and 0.77 (95 % CI: 0.66-0.87) in the validation group. The combined model with combined radiomics and clinicopathological characteristics achieved an AUC was 0.76 (95 % CI: 0.68-0.84) in the training group, and 0.80 (95 % CI: 0.67-0.92) in the validation group. Delong's test showed that the AUC of the combined model was significantly higher than that of the radiomics model alone in both the training group (P = 0.0067) and the validation group (P = 0.0009).The calibration curve showed good agreement between predicted and actual MPR. Clinical decision curve analysis showed that the combined model was superior to radiomics alone.

Conclusions

Radiomics model can predict MPR in NSCLC after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy with similar accuracy to RECIST assessment criteria. The combined model based on pretreatment CT radiomics and clinicopathological features showed better predictive power than independent radiomics model or independent clinicopathological features, suggesting that it may be more useful for guiding personalized neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy treatment strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用治疗前 CT 放射组学和非小细胞肺癌临床病理特征的组合模型预测新辅助化疗免疫疗法后的主要病理反应
摘要] 目的 探讨新辅助化疗免疫治疗后非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)临床病理特征、治疗前CT放射组学与主要病理反应(MPR)之间的关系,并建立预测新辅助化疗免疫治疗主要病理反应的联合模型。方法 对2019年1月至2021年4月接受新辅助化疗免疫治疗和手术治疗的211例NSCLC患者进行回顾性研究。患者分为两组:MPR组和非MPR组。使用 ITK SNAP 软件对治疗前 CT 图像进行分割,并使用 Python 软件提取放射组学特征。然后构建放射组学模型、临床模型和综合模型,并使用接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)进行验证。结果放射组学模型在训练组的 AUC 为 0.70(95 % CI:0.62-0.78),在验证组的 AUC 为 0.60(95 % CI:0.45-0.76)。通过多变量逻辑回归分析,从所有临床特征中筛选出 RECIST 评估结果作为 MPR 的独立因素。临床模型预测 MPR 的 AUC 在训练组为 0.66(95 % CI:0.59-0.73),在验证组为 0.77(95 % CI:0.66-0.87)。结合放射组学和临床病理特征的组合模型在训练组的AUC为0.76(95 % CI:0.68-0.84),在验证组的AUC为0.80(95 % CI:0.67-0.92)。德隆氏检验显示,在训练组(P = 0.0067)和验证组(P = 0.0009),联合模型的 AUC 均显著高于单独的放射组学模型。临床决策曲线分析表明,联合模型优于单独的放射组学模型。结论放射组学模型可以预测新辅助化疗免疫治疗后 NSCLC 的 MPR,其准确性与 RECIST 评估标准相似。基于治疗前CT放射组学和临床病理特征的联合模型比独立的放射组学模型或独立的临床病理特征显示出更好的预测能力,这表明它可能更有助于指导个性化的新辅助化疗免疫治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1