Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Parental Feeding Style Questionnaire.

IF 3.2 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psicothema Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.7334/psicothema2023.184

Irene Martínez-Hernández, Marina Olmos-Soria, Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero, María D Hidalgo, Ana V Valero-García

{"title":"Psychometric Properties of the Spanish Version of the Parental Feeding Style Questionnaire.","authors":"Irene Martínez-Hernández, Marina Olmos-Soria, Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero, María D Hidalgo, Ana V Valero-García","doi":"10.7334/psicothema2023.184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There are no validated instruments in Spain for measuring parental feeding styles. The aim was to validate the Parental Feeding Styles Questionnaires (PFSQ) in a Spanish sample.Method: A total of 523 mothers of 523 school-children participated. The children had a mean age of 4.4 years (SD = 1.3), with 51% being boys (M = 4.3 years, SD = 1.4) and 49% girls (M = 4.5 years, = SD 1.3). The PFSQ and the Comprehensive General Parenting Styles Questionnaire (CGPQ) were used.Results: A model of four correlated factors was identified: Prompting/encouraging eating, emotional feeding, instrumental feeding, and control over eating. Cronbach's alpha for the subscales ranged from 0.64 to 0.86, and McDonald's Omega coefficient ranged from 0.66 to 0.86. Emotional feeding and prompting/encouraging eating had values above 0.70, control over eating had a value of 0.68 and instrumental feeding had an alpha coefficient of 0.64 and omega coefficient of 0.66. The factor structure was similar to the original and to other adapted versions. The Spanish sample used more control over eating and prompting/encouraging to eat.Conclusions: The adapted PFSQ is a suitable instrument for assessing the feeding styles of Spanish parents.","PeriodicalId":48179,"journal":{"name":"Psicothema","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicothema","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2023.184","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are no validated instruments in Spain for measuring parental feeding styles. The aim was to validate the Parental Feeding Styles Questionnaires (PFSQ) in a Spanish sample.

Method: A total of 523 mothers of 523 school-children participated. The children had a mean age of 4.4 years (SD = 1.3), with 51% being boys (M = 4.3 years, SD = 1.4) and 49% girls (M = 4.5 years, = SD 1.3). The PFSQ and the Comprehensive General Parenting Styles Questionnaire (CGPQ) were used.

Results: A model of four correlated factors was identified: Prompting/encouraging eating, emotional feeding, instrumental feeding, and control over eating. Cronbach's alpha for the subscales ranged from 0.64 to 0.86, and McDonald's Omega coefficient ranged from 0.66 to 0.86. Emotional feeding and prompting/encouraging eating had values above 0.70, control over eating had a value of 0.68 and instrumental feeding had an alpha coefficient of 0.64 and omega coefficient of 0.66. The factor structure was similar to the original and to other adapted versions. The Spanish sample used more control over eating and prompting/encouraging to eat.

Conclusions: The adapted PFSQ is a suitable instrument for assessing the feeding styles of Spanish parents.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

父母喂养方式问卷西班牙文版的心理测量特性。

背景：西班牙没有经过验证的测量父母喂养方式的工具。本研究的目的是在西班牙样本中验证父母喂养方式问卷（PFSQ）：共有 523 名学龄儿童的 523 位母亲参加。这些儿童的平均年龄为 4.4 岁（SD = 1.3），其中 51% 为男孩（M = 4.3 岁，SD = 1.4），49% 为女孩（M = 4.5 岁，SD = 1.3）。研究使用了 PFSQ 和一般养育方式综合问卷（CGPQ）：结果：确定了一个由四个相关因素组成的模型：结果：确定了四个相关因子模型：催促/鼓励进食、情绪化喂养、工具性喂养和控制进食。各分量表的 Cronbach's alpha 值介于 0.64 到 0.86 之间，麦当劳欧米茄系数介于 0.66 到 0.86 之间。情感喂养和促使/鼓励进食的数值高于 0.70，控制进食的数值为 0.68，工具性喂养的α系数为 0.64，欧米茄系数为 0.66。因子结构与原始版本和其他改编版本相似。西班牙样本使用了更多的进食控制和进食提示/鼓励：结论：改编版 PFSQ 是评估西班牙父母喂养方式的合适工具。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Psicothema PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

6.50

自引率

16.70%

发文量

审稿时长

24 weeks

期刊介绍： La revista Psicothema fue fundada en Asturias en 1989 y está editada conjuntamente por la Facultad y el Departamento de Psicología de la Universidad de Oviedo y el Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias. Publica cuatro números al año. Se admiten trabajos tanto de investigación básica como aplicada, pertenecientes a cualquier ámbito de la Psicología, que previamente a su publicación son evaluados anónimamente por revisores externos. Psicothema está incluida en las bases de datos nacionales e internacionales más relevantes, entre las que cabe destacar Psychological Abstracts, Current Contents y MEDLINE/Index Medicus, entre otras. Además, figura en las listas de Factor de Impacto del Journal Citation Reports. Psicothema es una revista abierta a cualquier enfoque u orientación psicológica que venga avalada por la fuerza de los datos y los argumentos, y en la que encuentran acomodo todos los autores que sean capaces de convencer a los revisores de que sus manuscritos tienen la calidad para ser publicados. Psicothema es una revista de acceso abierto lo que significa que todo el contenido está a disposición de cualquier usuario o institución sin cargo alguno. Los usuarios pueden leer, descargar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar, o realizar enlaces a los textos completos de esta revista sin pedir permiso previo al editor o al autor, siempre y cuando la fuente original sea referenciada. Para acervos y repositorios, se prefiere que la cobertura se realice mediante enlaces a la propia web de Psicothema. Nos parece que una apuesta decidida por la calidad es el mejor modo de servir a nuestros lectores, cuyas sugerencias siempre serán bienvenidas.