{"title":"Application of deep learning for the analysis of stomata: a review of current methods and future directions.","authors":"Jonathon A Gibbs, Alexandra J Burgess","doi":"10.1093/jxb/erae207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plant physiology and metabolism rely on the function of stomata, structures on the surface of above-ground organs that facilitate the exchange of gases with the atmosphere. The morphology of the guard cells and corresponding pore that make up the stomata, as well as the density (number per unit area), are critical in determining overall gas exchange capacity. These characteristics can be quantified visually from images captured using microscopy, traditionally relying on time-consuming manual analysis. However, deep learning (DL) models provide a promising route to increase the throughput and accuracy of plant phenotyping tasks, including stomatal analysis. Here we review the published literature on the application of DL for stomatal analysis. We discuss the variation in pipelines used, from data acquisition, pre-processing, DL architecture, and output evaluation to post-processing. We introduce the most common network structures, the plant species that have been studied, and the measurements that have been performed. Through this review, we hope to promote the use of DL methods for plant phenotyping tasks and highlight future requirements to optimize uptake, predominantly focusing on the sharing of datasets and generalization of models as well as the caveats associated with utilizing image data to infer physiological function.</p>","PeriodicalId":15820,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Botany","volume":" ","pages":"6704-6718"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565211/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Botany","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erae207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Plant physiology and metabolism rely on the function of stomata, structures on the surface of above-ground organs that facilitate the exchange of gases with the atmosphere. The morphology of the guard cells and corresponding pore that make up the stomata, as well as the density (number per unit area), are critical in determining overall gas exchange capacity. These characteristics can be quantified visually from images captured using microscopy, traditionally relying on time-consuming manual analysis. However, deep learning (DL) models provide a promising route to increase the throughput and accuracy of plant phenotyping tasks, including stomatal analysis. Here we review the published literature on the application of DL for stomatal analysis. We discuss the variation in pipelines used, from data acquisition, pre-processing, DL architecture, and output evaluation to post-processing. We introduce the most common network structures, the plant species that have been studied, and the measurements that have been performed. Through this review, we hope to promote the use of DL methods for plant phenotyping tasks and highlight future requirements to optimize uptake, predominantly focusing on the sharing of datasets and generalization of models as well as the caveats associated with utilizing image data to infer physiological function.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Experimental Botany publishes high-quality primary research and review papers in the plant sciences. These papers cover a range of disciplines from molecular and cellular physiology and biochemistry through whole plant physiology to community physiology.
Full-length primary papers should contribute to our understanding of how plants develop and function, and should provide new insights into biological processes. The journal will not publish purely descriptive papers or papers that report a well-known process in a species in which the process has not been identified previously. Articles should be concise and generally limited to 10 printed pages.