Positive and negative social media experiences and proximal risk for suicidal ideation in adolescents.

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1111/jcpp.13996
Jessica L Hamilton, Maya Dalack, Simone Imani Boyd, Saskia Jorgensen, Melissa J Dreier, Jas Sarna, David A Brent
{"title":"Positive and negative social media experiences and proximal risk for suicidal ideation in adolescents.","authors":"Jessica L Hamilton, Maya Dalack, Simone Imani Boyd, Saskia Jorgensen, Melissa J Dreier, Jas Sarna, David A Brent","doi":"10.1111/jcpp.13996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social media (SM) has received considerable attention as a potential risk factor for adolescent suicide. Few empirical studies, however, have examined adolescents' daily negative and positive experiences on SM and its proximal impacts on suicidal ideation (SI), particularly using intensive monitoring designs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Adolescents (N = 60; 14-17 years; 49% girls; 62% LGBTQ+) recruited using SM across the United States and participated in an 8-week intensive monitoring protocol. Ecological momentary assessment (three brief surveys per day) asked about negative and positive SM experiences and SI (passive and active). Multilevel modelling was used to evaluate the within-person relationships between daily SM experiences (e.g. individual fluctuations compared to a person's average) and SI, controlling for average levels of SM experiences, SM use screen time, and lifetime SI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant within-person effects of negative and positive SM experiences were associated with days when adolescents had SI. Specifically, on days when teens endorsed more frequent negative SM experiences than usual, they were more likely to report SI. However, more positive SM experiences than usual were associated with a lower likelihood of having SI. There were no significant effects of SM use ('screen time') on SI or on the reverse associations of SI on next-day SM experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results indicate that SM experiences may be dynamic and modifiable risk and protective factors for SI in adolescents, whereas there is no effect of SM screen time on SI. Our results highlight that targeting negative SM experiences and augmenting the positive experiences on SM may be critical targets to improve teens' mental health and prevent suicide, rather than focusing on limiting SM screen time.</p>","PeriodicalId":187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557734/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13996","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social media (SM) has received considerable attention as a potential risk factor for adolescent suicide. Few empirical studies, however, have examined adolescents' daily negative and positive experiences on SM and its proximal impacts on suicidal ideation (SI), particularly using intensive monitoring designs.

Method: Adolescents (N = 60; 14-17 years; 49% girls; 62% LGBTQ+) recruited using SM across the United States and participated in an 8-week intensive monitoring protocol. Ecological momentary assessment (three brief surveys per day) asked about negative and positive SM experiences and SI (passive and active). Multilevel modelling was used to evaluate the within-person relationships between daily SM experiences (e.g. individual fluctuations compared to a person's average) and SI, controlling for average levels of SM experiences, SM use screen time, and lifetime SI.

Results: Significant within-person effects of negative and positive SM experiences were associated with days when adolescents had SI. Specifically, on days when teens endorsed more frequent negative SM experiences than usual, they were more likely to report SI. However, more positive SM experiences than usual were associated with a lower likelihood of having SI. There were no significant effects of SM use ('screen time') on SI or on the reverse associations of SI on next-day SM experiences.

Conclusions: Results indicate that SM experiences may be dynamic and modifiable risk and protective factors for SI in adolescents, whereas there is no effect of SM screen time on SI. Our results highlight that targeting negative SM experiences and augmenting the positive experiences on SM may be critical targets to improve teens' mental health and prevent suicide, rather than focusing on limiting SM screen time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年积极和消极的社交媒体经历与自杀倾向的近端风险。
背景:社交媒体(SM)作为青少年自杀的潜在风险因素受到了广泛关注。然而,很少有实证研究对青少年在社交媒体上的日常负面和正面经历及其对自杀意念(SI)的近端影响进行研究,尤其是采用强化监测设计的研究:青少年(N = 60;14-17 岁;49% 为女孩;62% 为 LGBTQ+)通过 SM 在美国各地招募,并参加了为期 8 周的强化监测方案。生态瞬间评估(每天三次简短调查)询问消极和积极的 SM 体验以及 SI(被动和主动)。多层次建模用于评估每日SM体验(例如,与个人平均水平相比的个人波动)和SI之间的人际关系,同时控制SM体验的平均水平、SM使用屏幕时间和终生SI:结果:青少年的消极和积极 SM 体验与 SI 日有显著的个人内部影响。具体来说,当青少年比平时更频繁地认可消极的SM经历时,他们更有可能报告SI。然而,比平时更积极的SM经历则与发生SI的可能性较低有关。SM使用("屏幕时间")对SI或SI对第二天SM经历的反向关联没有明显影响:结果表明,SM经历可能是青少年SI的动态和可改变的风险和保护因素,而SM屏幕时间对SI没有影响。我们的研究结果突出表明,针对青少年的消极SM体验和增加SM中的积极体验可能是改善青少年心理健康和预防自杀的关键目标,而不是专注于限制SM屏幕时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
169
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (JCPP) is a highly regarded international publication that focuses on the fields of child and adolescent psychology and psychiatry. It is recognized for publishing top-tier, clinically relevant research across various disciplines related to these areas. JCPP has a broad global readership and covers a diverse range of topics, including: Epidemiology: Studies on the prevalence and distribution of mental health issues in children and adolescents. Diagnosis: Research on the identification and classification of childhood disorders. Treatments: Psychotherapeutic and psychopharmacological interventions for child and adolescent mental health. Behavior and Cognition: Studies on the behavioral and cognitive aspects of childhood disorders. Neuroscience and Neurobiology: Research on the neural and biological underpinnings of child mental health. Genetics: Genetic factors contributing to the development of childhood disorders. JCPP serves as a platform for integrating empirical research, clinical studies, and high-quality reviews from diverse perspectives, theoretical viewpoints, and disciplines. This interdisciplinary approach is a key feature of the journal, as it fosters a comprehensive understanding of child and adolescent mental health. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry is published 12 times a year and is affiliated with the Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health (ACAMH), which supports the journal's mission to advance knowledge and practice in the field of child and adolescent mental health.
期刊最新文献
Life course predictors of child emotional distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from a prospective intergenerational cohort study. Health, behavior, and social outcomes among offspring of parents with criminal convictions: a register-based study from Sweden. Positive and negative social media experiences and proximal risk for suicidal ideation in adolescents. Clinical distinction between cognitive disengagement syndrome and ADHD presentations in a nationally representative sample of Spanish children and adolescents. Patterns of sub-optimal change following CBT for childhood anxiety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1