The RELIEF feasibility trial: topical lidocaine patches in older adults with rib fractures.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Emergency Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1136/emermed-2024-213905
Madeleine Clout, Nicholas Turner, Clare Clement, Philip Braude, Jonathan Benger, James Gagg, Emma Gendall, Simon Holloway, Jenny Ingram, Rebecca Kandiyali, Amanda Lewis, Nick A Maskell, David Shipway, Jason E Smith, Jodi Taylor, Alia Darweish Medniuk, Edward Carlton
{"title":"The RELIEF feasibility trial: topical lidocaine patches in older adults with rib fractures.","authors":"Madeleine Clout, Nicholas Turner, Clare Clement, Philip Braude, Jonathan Benger, James Gagg, Emma Gendall, Simon Holloway, Jenny Ingram, Rebecca Kandiyali, Amanda Lewis, Nick A Maskell, David Shipway, Jason E Smith, Jodi Taylor, Alia Darweish Medniuk, Edward Carlton","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-213905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lidocaine patches, applied over rib fractures, may reduce pulmonary complications in older patients. Known barriers to recruiting older patients in emergency settings necessitate a feasibility trial. We aimed to establish whether a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluating lidocaine patches in older patients with rib fracture(s) was feasible.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicentre, parallel-group, open-label, feasibility RCT in seven hospitals in England and Scotland. Patients aged ≥65 years, presenting to ED with traumatic rib fracture(s) requiring hospital admission were randomised to receive up to 3×700 mg lidocaine patches (Ralvo), first applied in ED and then once daily for 72 hours in addition to standard care, or standard care alone. Feasibility outcomes were recruitment, retention and adherence. Clinical end points (pulmonary complications, pain and frailty-specific outcomes) and patient questionnaires were collected to determine feasibility of data collection and inform health economic scoping. Interviews and focus groups with trial participants and clinicians/research staff explored the understanding and acceptability of trial processes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between October 23, 2021 and October 7, 2022, 206 patients were eligible, of whom 100 (median age 83 years; IQR 74-88) were randomised; 48 to lidocaine patches and 52 to standard care. Pulmonary complications at 30 days were determined in 86% of participants and 83% of expected 30-day questionnaires were returned. Pulmonary complications occurred in 48% of the lidocaine group and 59% in standard care. Pain and some frailty-specific outcomes were not feasible to collect. Staff reported challenges in patient compliance, unfamiliarity with research measures and overwhelming the patients with research procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recruitment of older patients with rib fracture(s) in an emergency setting for the evaluation of lidocaine patches is feasible. Refinement of data collection, with a focus on the collection of pain, frailty-specific outcomes and intervention delivery are needed before progression to a definitive trial.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ISRCTN14813929.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"522-531"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11347219/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-213905","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lidocaine patches, applied over rib fractures, may reduce pulmonary complications in older patients. Known barriers to recruiting older patients in emergency settings necessitate a feasibility trial. We aimed to establish whether a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) evaluating lidocaine patches in older patients with rib fracture(s) was feasible.

Methods: This was a multicentre, parallel-group, open-label, feasibility RCT in seven hospitals in England and Scotland. Patients aged ≥65 years, presenting to ED with traumatic rib fracture(s) requiring hospital admission were randomised to receive up to 3×700 mg lidocaine patches (Ralvo), first applied in ED and then once daily for 72 hours in addition to standard care, or standard care alone. Feasibility outcomes were recruitment, retention and adherence. Clinical end points (pulmonary complications, pain and frailty-specific outcomes) and patient questionnaires were collected to determine feasibility of data collection and inform health economic scoping. Interviews and focus groups with trial participants and clinicians/research staff explored the understanding and acceptability of trial processes.

Results: Between October 23, 2021 and October 7, 2022, 206 patients were eligible, of whom 100 (median age 83 years; IQR 74-88) were randomised; 48 to lidocaine patches and 52 to standard care. Pulmonary complications at 30 days were determined in 86% of participants and 83% of expected 30-day questionnaires were returned. Pulmonary complications occurred in 48% of the lidocaine group and 59% in standard care. Pain and some frailty-specific outcomes were not feasible to collect. Staff reported challenges in patient compliance, unfamiliarity with research measures and overwhelming the patients with research procedures.

Conclusion: Recruitment of older patients with rib fracture(s) in an emergency setting for the evaluation of lidocaine patches is feasible. Refinement of data collection, with a focus on the collection of pain, frailty-specific outcomes and intervention delivery are needed before progression to a definitive trial.

Trial registration number: ISRCTN14813929.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
RELIEF 可行性试验:肋骨骨折老年人的局部利多卡因贴片。
背景:在肋骨骨折处贴利多卡因贴片可减少老年患者的肺部并发症。在急诊环境中招募老年患者存在已知障碍,因此有必要进行可行性试验。我们的目的是确定一项明确的随机对照试验(RCT)是否可行,以评估利多卡因贴片对肋骨骨折老年患者的治疗效果:这是一项多中心、平行组、开放标签、可行性 RCT,在英格兰和苏格兰的七家医院进行。年龄≥65岁、因外伤性肋骨骨折到急诊科就诊并需要入院治疗的患者被随机分配到接受最多3×700毫克利多卡因贴片(Ralvo)治疗,首先在急诊科使用,然后在72小时内每天使用一次,作为标准护理的补充,或者仅接受标准护理。可行性结果为招募、保留和坚持率。收集临床终点(肺部并发症、疼痛和虚弱特异性结果)和患者问卷,以确定数据收集的可行性,并为健康经济范围界定提供信息。与试验参与者和临床医生/研究人员的访谈和焦点小组探讨了对试验过程的理解和可接受性:在 2021 年 10 月 23 日至 2022 年 10 月 7 日期间,206 名患者符合条件,其中 100 人(中位年龄 83 岁;IQR 74-88)被随机分配;48 人接受利多卡因贴片治疗,52 人接受标准护理。86%的参与者在30天后确定了肺部并发症,83%的参与者返回了预期的30天调查问卷。利多卡因贴片组中有 48% 出现肺部并发症,标准护理组中有 59% 出现肺部并发症。疼痛和一些虚弱特异性结果无法收集。工作人员报告称,在患者的依从性、对研究措施的不熟悉以及对研究程序的不知所措等方面存在挑战:结论:在急诊环境中招募肋骨骨折的老年患者对利多卡因贴片进行评估是可行的。在进行最终试验之前,需要完善数据收集工作,重点是收集疼痛、虚弱特异性结果和干预措施的实施情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
期刊最新文献
Best evidence topic report: can intradermal sterile water injections provide effective pain relief in patients with renal colic? Correspondence on 'Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate versus andexanet alfa for the reversal of traumatic brain injuries' by Sadek et al. Correspondence on 'Four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate versus andexanet alfa for the reversal of traumatic brain injuries' by Sadek et al. Is it time to reframe resuscitation in trauma? Are there differences in low-acuity emergency department visits between culturally and linguistically diverse migrants and people with English-speaking background: a population-based linkage study of adults over 45.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1