Multicentre cross-sectional study to assess nursing workload in Belgian emergency departments.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Emergency Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1136/emermed-2024-214334
Thomas Ganty, Julien Szecel, Anh Diep, Alexandre Ghuysen, Méryl Paquay
{"title":"Multicentre cross-sectional study to assess nursing workload in Belgian emergency departments.","authors":"Thomas Ganty, Julien Szecel, Anh Diep, Alexandre Ghuysen, Méryl Paquay","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Excessive workload in emergency departments (ED) negatively affects patient safety, often leading to missed critical tasks due to time constraints. The Workload Assessment of Nurses on Emergency (WANE) scale developed in Belgium offers a detailed measurement of nursing workload, but its complexity makes it hard to use in practice. Our study aims to find a simpler method for assessing nursing workload in EDs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicentre cross-sectional study was performed in four Belgian EDs between September 2022 and March 2023. Nursing workload was assessed using the WANE scale in each hospital, during 4-hour time periods. The associations between WANE scores, and nurses' subjective workload assessment, number of patients, patient triage levels, post-triage destination area and the Jones Dependency Tool Score were examined employing multiple linear regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>161 nurses, caring for 591 patients, were included. 67% of the variation in 'direct' care time could be explained with a model based on triage level and two items of the Jones Dependency Tool (ABC perturbation and mobility). The number of new patients admitted and nurses' perceived workload were also highly associated with the total nursing care time TNCT. The actual number of patients in the ED at any time explained 78% of the variation in TNCT. Each additional patient increases the TNTC by 45.22 min.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simple indicators might be used to evaluate the nursing care time in Belgian EDs. A retrospective method is suggested, using the total number of patients over a defined period of time. This study reveals a path to a predictive method to calculate the direct care time for each patient with three simple indicators, available from nursing triage stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214334","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Excessive workload in emergency departments (ED) negatively affects patient safety, often leading to missed critical tasks due to time constraints. The Workload Assessment of Nurses on Emergency (WANE) scale developed in Belgium offers a detailed measurement of nursing workload, but its complexity makes it hard to use in practice. Our study aims to find a simpler method for assessing nursing workload in EDs.

Methods: A multicentre cross-sectional study was performed in four Belgian EDs between September 2022 and March 2023. Nursing workload was assessed using the WANE scale in each hospital, during 4-hour time periods. The associations between WANE scores, and nurses' subjective workload assessment, number of patients, patient triage levels, post-triage destination area and the Jones Dependency Tool Score were examined employing multiple linear regression models.

Results: 161 nurses, caring for 591 patients, were included. 67% of the variation in 'direct' care time could be explained with a model based on triage level and two items of the Jones Dependency Tool (ABC perturbation and mobility). The number of new patients admitted and nurses' perceived workload were also highly associated with the total nursing care time TNCT. The actual number of patients in the ED at any time explained 78% of the variation in TNCT. Each additional patient increases the TNTC by 45.22 min.

Conclusions: Simple indicators might be used to evaluate the nursing care time in Belgian EDs. A retrospective method is suggested, using the total number of patients over a defined period of time. This study reveals a path to a predictive method to calculate the direct care time for each patient with three simple indicators, available from nursing triage stage.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
期刊最新文献
Multicentre cross-sectional study to assess nursing workload in Belgian emergency departments. Practitioner experiences of developing and implementing two UK ED-based hospital violence intervention programmes: a process evaluation. Well-being interventions alone won't heal. Identifying the walk-in wounded: paediatric major trauma patients self-presenting to a paediatric major trauma centre. Understanding cardiac arrest dispatch of physician-paramedic critical care prehospital teams: a survey-based evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1