The potential for minimally invasive intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation in routine healthcare: applicability of the ENRICH trial criteria to an unselected cohort

Trine Apostolaki-Hansson, Amir Hillal, Nathanael Göransson, Björn M. Hansen, Bo Norrving, Birgitta Ramgren, J. Wassélius, Teresa Ullberg
{"title":"The potential for minimally invasive intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation in routine healthcare: applicability of the ENRICH trial criteria to an unselected cohort","authors":"Trine Apostolaki-Hansson, Amir Hillal, Nathanael Göransson, Björn M. Hansen, Bo Norrving, Birgitta Ramgren, J. Wassélius, Teresa Ullberg","doi":"10.3389/fstro.2024.1403812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the favorable outcomes demonstrated by the Early MiNimally-invasive Removal of IntraCerebral Hemorrhage (ENRICH) trial in supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients treated with minimally invasive surgery (MIS), and considering the increasing interest in MIS, we aimed to assess the potential eligibility rate for ICH patients in Sweden.All patients with spontaneous ICH in the Swedish Stroke Register (RS) during 2017–2020 in Skane county (1.37 million) were assessed. Baseline imaging was used for radiological characterization. Clinical data were obtained from RS. MIS eligibility in the total ICH population meeting ENRICH criteria were estimated and extrapolated to the Swedish population (10.5 million).Of 1,314 ICH patients, 5.9% met the ENRICH criteria for MIS (ICH volume 30–80 ml). Considering the ENRICH trial results indicating the effectiveness of MIS was mainly attributable to intervention for lobar hemorrhages, we determined that 2.8% of our ICH cohort in Sweden would be eligible for MIS. The estimated rate of neurosurgery for ICH could increase from the current 1.46–1.90 patients/100,000 population/year (in absolute numbers from 154 to 200 interventions out of 2,400 ICHs in Sweden annually).We show that 2.8% of the Skane ICH population would be eligible for MIS if ENRICH criteria are employed for patients with lobar ICH, corresponding to a 29% increase of current surgical rates for ICH in Sweden. As MIS for ICH is not yet standard practice in Sweden, consideration for its implementation within the neurosurgical organization becomes essential to accommodate the anticipated increase in patient demand.","PeriodicalId":504975,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Stroke","volume":"43 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fstro.2024.1403812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following the favorable outcomes demonstrated by the Early MiNimally-invasive Removal of IntraCerebral Hemorrhage (ENRICH) trial in supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients treated with minimally invasive surgery (MIS), and considering the increasing interest in MIS, we aimed to assess the potential eligibility rate for ICH patients in Sweden.All patients with spontaneous ICH in the Swedish Stroke Register (RS) during 2017–2020 in Skane county (1.37 million) were assessed. Baseline imaging was used for radiological characterization. Clinical data were obtained from RS. MIS eligibility in the total ICH population meeting ENRICH criteria were estimated and extrapolated to the Swedish population (10.5 million).Of 1,314 ICH patients, 5.9% met the ENRICH criteria for MIS (ICH volume 30–80 ml). Considering the ENRICH trial results indicating the effectiveness of MIS was mainly attributable to intervention for lobar hemorrhages, we determined that 2.8% of our ICH cohort in Sweden would be eligible for MIS. The estimated rate of neurosurgery for ICH could increase from the current 1.46–1.90 patients/100,000 population/year (in absolute numbers from 154 to 200 interventions out of 2,400 ICHs in Sweden annually).We show that 2.8% of the Skane ICH population would be eligible for MIS if ENRICH criteria are employed for patients with lobar ICH, corresponding to a 29% increase of current surgical rates for ICH in Sweden. As MIS for ICH is not yet standard practice in Sweden, consideration for its implementation within the neurosurgical organization becomes essential to accommodate the anticipated increase in patient demand.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
微创脑出血抽吸术在常规医疗保健中的应用潜力:ENRICH 试验标准对非选定人群的适用性
脑室上脑室内出血(ICH)患者接受微创手术(MIS)治疗后,早期微创清除脑室内出血(ENRICH)试验取得了良好的效果,考虑到人们对微创手术的兴趣与日俱增,我们旨在评估瑞典ICH患者的潜在合格率。基线成像用于放射学特征描述。临床数据来自 RS。在 1314 名 ICH 患者中,5.9% 符合 ENRICH 的 MIS 标准(ICH 容量 30-80 毫升)。考虑到 ENRICH 试验结果表明 MIS 的有效性主要归功于对叶状出血的干预,我们认为瑞典有 2.8% 的 ICH 患者符合 MIS 标准。据估计,ICH 神经外科手术率将从目前的 1.46-1.90 例/100,000 人/年(瑞典每年 2,400 例 ICH 中,介入治疗的绝对数量从 154 例增至 200 例)上升。我们的研究表明,如果对叶状 ICH 患者采用 ENRICH 标准,Skane ICH 患者中将有 2.8% 符合 MIS 治疗条件,这相当于将瑞典目前的 ICH 手术率提高了 29%。由于 MIS 治疗 ICH 在瑞典尚未成为标准做法,因此必须考虑在神经外科组织内实施 MIS,以满足预期增加的患者需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The potential for minimally invasive intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation in routine healthcare: applicability of the ENRICH trial criteria to an unselected cohort The feasibility of health professional student delivered social visits for stroke survivors with loneliness Exoskeleton-assisted training to enhance lower limb motor recovery in subacute stroke: does timing matter? A pilot randomized trial General ability and specific cognitive functions are lower in children with epilepsy after perinatal ischemic stroke Editorial: Diversity in stroke omic(s) and epidemiology research: opportunities and challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1