Exoskeleton-assisted training to enhance lower limb motor recovery in subacute stroke: does timing matter? A pilot randomized trial

Jonas Schröder, Laetitia Yperzeele, Elissa Embrechts, R. Loureiro-Chaves, Ann Hallemans, C. Lafosse, S. Truijen, Gert Kwakkel, W. Saeys
{"title":"Exoskeleton-assisted training to enhance lower limb motor recovery in subacute stroke: does timing matter? A pilot randomized trial","authors":"Jonas Schröder, Laetitia Yperzeele, Elissa Embrechts, R. Loureiro-Chaves, Ann Hallemans, C. Lafosse, S. Truijen, Gert Kwakkel, W. Saeys","doi":"10.3389/fstro.2024.1379083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lower limb motor recovery, including abnormal muscle synergies, occurs mainly within the first 5–8 weeks after a stroke. This suggests the importance of delivering impairment-focused therapies, such as therapeutic robots that promote symmetric gait, during this time-sensitive period, following the principle of “the earlier, the better.”First, to compare early robotic training (ERT) with usual care (UC) against UC alone on restoring intralimb muscle synergies and interlimb symmetry during functional tasks; Second, to investigate whether ERT is superior to delayed robotic training (DRT) starting after the proposed time-sensitive period.This observer-blinded, randomized pilot trial with crossover design involved 19 nonambulatory adults included within 14 days poststroke. Those allocated to ERT (N = 10) received immediately 4 weeks of training (16 sessions, 4× /week) with the Ekso GT® above UC and were compared with the DRT group (N = 9) who received UC alone at this point. Thereafter a 3-week UC period followed to investigate sustainability of ERT and the interventional roles were exchanged; at about week 8 poststroke DRT subjects started the same experimental robotic protocol and ERT subjects continued UC as controls. Outcomes included changes in Fugl-Meyer lower extremity scores (FM-LE) reflecting muscle synergies, weight-bearing asymmetry (WBA), and dynamic control asymmetry (DCA) during quiet standing. Functional ambulation category (FAC) was used to classify walking independence (cut-off ≥4).A trend toward earlier reacquisition of walking independence favoring ERT with UC over UC was not accompanied by differences in FM-LE, WBA, or DCA (first objective). Thereafter, DRT with UC did not yield any significant changes relative to UC, such that no between-group differences were found favoring restorative effects of ERT over DRT (second objective).This pilot trial shows the feasibility of investigating a wearable exoskeleton as an adjunct therapy in subacute stroke. Nevertheless, our preliminary findings suggest that motor recovery of lower limb muscle synergies was not enhanced by 4 weeks of robotic training to reduce compensations with the less-affected side, irrespective of the timing of application.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03727919.","PeriodicalId":504975,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Stroke","volume":"47 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fstro.2024.1379083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lower limb motor recovery, including abnormal muscle synergies, occurs mainly within the first 5–8 weeks after a stroke. This suggests the importance of delivering impairment-focused therapies, such as therapeutic robots that promote symmetric gait, during this time-sensitive period, following the principle of “the earlier, the better.”First, to compare early robotic training (ERT) with usual care (UC) against UC alone on restoring intralimb muscle synergies and interlimb symmetry during functional tasks; Second, to investigate whether ERT is superior to delayed robotic training (DRT) starting after the proposed time-sensitive period.This observer-blinded, randomized pilot trial with crossover design involved 19 nonambulatory adults included within 14 days poststroke. Those allocated to ERT (N = 10) received immediately 4 weeks of training (16 sessions, 4× /week) with the Ekso GT® above UC and were compared with the DRT group (N = 9) who received UC alone at this point. Thereafter a 3-week UC period followed to investigate sustainability of ERT and the interventional roles were exchanged; at about week 8 poststroke DRT subjects started the same experimental robotic protocol and ERT subjects continued UC as controls. Outcomes included changes in Fugl-Meyer lower extremity scores (FM-LE) reflecting muscle synergies, weight-bearing asymmetry (WBA), and dynamic control asymmetry (DCA) during quiet standing. Functional ambulation category (FAC) was used to classify walking independence (cut-off ≥4).A trend toward earlier reacquisition of walking independence favoring ERT with UC over UC was not accompanied by differences in FM-LE, WBA, or DCA (first objective). Thereafter, DRT with UC did not yield any significant changes relative to UC, such that no between-group differences were found favoring restorative effects of ERT over DRT (second objective).This pilot trial shows the feasibility of investigating a wearable exoskeleton as an adjunct therapy in subacute stroke. Nevertheless, our preliminary findings suggest that motor recovery of lower limb muscle synergies was not enhanced by 4 weeks of robotic training to reduce compensations with the less-affected side, irrespective of the timing of application.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03727919.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外骨骼辅助训练促进亚急性中风患者的下肢运动恢复:时机是否重要?试点随机试验
下肢运动的恢复,包括异常肌肉协同作用的恢复,主要发生在中风后的最初 5-8 周内。这表明,在这个时间敏感期,按照 "越早越好 "的原则提供以损伤为重点的疗法(如促进对称步态的治疗机器人)非常重要。"首先,比较早期机器人训练(ERT)与常规护理(UC)和单纯的常规护理在恢复功能性任务中的肢体内肌肉协同作用和肢体间对称性方面的效果;其次,研究ERT是否优于在建议的时间敏感期之后开始的延迟机器人训练(DRT)。被分配到 ERT 组的成人(10 人)立即接受了为期 4 周的 Ekso GT® UC 训练(16 节课,每周 4 次),并与 DRT 组(9 人)进行了比较,后者在此阶段仅接受了 UC 训练。此后,他们接受了为期 3 周的 UC 训练,以研究 ERT 的可持续性,并交换了干预角色;在卒中后第 8 周左右,DRT 受试者开始接受相同的机器人实验方案,而 ERT 受试者则作为对照组继续接受 UC 训练。研究结果包括反映肌肉协同作用的 Fugl-Meyer 下肢评分(FM-LE)、负重不对称(WBA)和安静站立时动态控制不对称(DCA)的变化。使用 UC 的 ERT 比使用 UC 的 ERT 更早恢复步行独立性,但 FM-LE、WBA 或 DCA(第一个目标)并无差异。此后,使用 UC 的 DRT 与 UC 相比未产生任何显著变化,因此未发现 ERT 的恢复效果优于 DRT 的组间差异(第二个目标)。这项试验表明,将可穿戴外骨骼作为亚急性中风的辅助疗法进行研究是可行的。尽管如此,我们的初步研究结果表明,无论应用的时机如何,为期 4 周的机器人训练并不能促进下肢肌肉协同的运动恢复,从而减少受影响较小一侧的代偿:NCT03727919。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The potential for minimally invasive intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation in routine healthcare: applicability of the ENRICH trial criteria to an unselected cohort The feasibility of health professional student delivered social visits for stroke survivors with loneliness Exoskeleton-assisted training to enhance lower limb motor recovery in subacute stroke: does timing matter? A pilot randomized trial General ability and specific cognitive functions are lower in children with epilepsy after perinatal ischemic stroke Editorial: Diversity in stroke omic(s) and epidemiology research: opportunities and challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1