Comparative Analysis of Nucleocapsid Antibody Levels, Neutralizing Antibodies, and Spike receptor-binding Domain in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 Patients

Rinta Prasetiyanti, Munawaroh Fitriah, Yufi Aulia Azmi, Kevin Muliawan Soetanto, Marvin Castillo
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Nucleocapsid Antibody Levels, Neutralizing Antibodies, and Spike receptor-binding Domain in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 Patients","authors":"Rinta Prasetiyanti, Munawaroh Fitriah, Yufi Aulia Azmi, Kevin Muliawan Soetanto, Marvin Castillo","doi":"10.4103/bhsj.bhsj_49_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n Serological testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is crucial for detecting antibodies generated in response to infection. Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) target the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein (S-RBD) and can exist in the forms of immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgM, and IgA. This study aimed to assess specific antibody responses to the nucleocapsid protein (N), S-RBD, and NAbs and correlate them with the clinical spectrum of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).\n \n \n \n A cross-sectional design was conducted at the Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Indonesia. We examined 48 patients with confirmed COVID-19 of varying severity (mild, moderate, severe, and critical) on treatment days 0, 3, and 6. We measured nucleocapsid antibodies, S-RBD, and neutralization using the chemiluminescence immunoassay method. The comparative analysis of IgM, IgG, NAB, and S-RBD levels is adjudicated using the independent t-test.\n \n \n \n Specific antibody levels on treatment days 0, 3, and 6 showed significant differences (P < 0.05). Notably, significant differences were observed in comparisons such as severe recovery versus severe death groups on day 0 in IgG, mild versus severe recovery on day 3 in IgM, moderate versus severe recovery, severe recovery versus severe death, and mild versus severe recovery on day 3, as well as on day 6 in anti-S-RBD, and mild versus severe recovery on day 3 and day 6 in neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 (P < 0.05).\n \n \n \n These findings highlight the dynamic antibody responses during COVID-19 treatment and their relevance for clinical outcomes.\n","PeriodicalId":9324,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecular and Health Science Journal","volume":"3 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecular and Health Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bhsj.bhsj_49_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Serological testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is crucial for detecting antibodies generated in response to infection. Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) target the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein (S-RBD) and can exist in the forms of immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgM, and IgA. This study aimed to assess specific antibody responses to the nucleocapsid protein (N), S-RBD, and NAbs and correlate them with the clinical spectrum of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A cross-sectional design was conducted at the Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Indonesia. We examined 48 patients with confirmed COVID-19 of varying severity (mild, moderate, severe, and critical) on treatment days 0, 3, and 6. We measured nucleocapsid antibodies, S-RBD, and neutralization using the chemiluminescence immunoassay method. The comparative analysis of IgM, IgG, NAB, and S-RBD levels is adjudicated using the independent t-test. Specific antibody levels on treatment days 0, 3, and 6 showed significant differences (P < 0.05). Notably, significant differences were observed in comparisons such as severe recovery versus severe death groups on day 0 in IgG, mild versus severe recovery on day 3 in IgM, moderate versus severe recovery, severe recovery versus severe death, and mild versus severe recovery on day 3, as well as on day 6 in anti-S-RBD, and mild versus severe recovery on day 3 and day 6 in neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 (P < 0.05). These findings highlight the dynamic antibody responses during COVID-19 treatment and their relevance for clinical outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2 患者核壳抗体水平、中和抗体和尖峰受体结合域的比较分析
摘要 严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒-2(SARS-CoV-2)血清学检测对于检测感染后产生的抗体至关重要。中和抗体(NAbs)靶向尖峰蛋白(S-RBD)的受体结合域(RBD),可以免疫球蛋白 G(IgG)、IgM 和 IgA 的形式存在。本研究旨在评估对核壳蛋白(N)、S-RBD和NAbs的特异性抗体反应,并将其与2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的临床谱相关联。 我们在印度尼西亚苏托莫博士综合学术医院(Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital)进行了一项横断面设计。我们在治疗的第0、3和6天对48名确诊为COVID-19的不同严重程度(轻度、中度、重度和危重)的患者进行了检查。我们使用化学发光免疫测定法测定了核壳抗体、S-RBD 和中和抗体。IgM、IgG、NAB和S-RBD水平的比较分析采用独立t检验。 治疗第 0、3 和 6 天的特异性抗体水平差异显著(P < 0.05)。值得注意的是,在第 0 天 IgG 重度康复组与重度死亡组、第 3 天 IgM 轻度康复组与重度康复组、中度康复组与重度康复组、重度康复组与重度死亡组、第 3 天轻度康复组与重度康复组以及第 6 天抗 S-RBD 组、第 3 天和第 6 天 SARS-CoV-2 中和组轻度康复组与重度康复组等比较中观察到了显著差异(P < 0.05)。 这些发现突显了 COVID-19 治疗期间的动态抗体反应及其与临床结果的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix by Using Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate and Biomechanical Property Testing Characteristic Differences between Freeze-dried Tenogenic Secretomes and Freeze-dried Crude Secretomes of Mesenchymal Stem Cells under Hypoxic Conditions Orbital Structure Involvement in Midface Fractures Impacting Ocular Injury at a Tertiary Hospital in Eastern Indonesia Comparative Analysis of Nucleocapsid Antibody Levels, Neutralizing Antibodies, and Spike receptor-binding Domain in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 Patients Diathesis Hemorrhagic, Coagulation and Fibrinolytic System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1