Developing Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix by Using Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate and Biomechanical Property Testing

M. Primasari, I. D. Saputro, L. Hariani, Glorian Paul Bosco Velusamy
{"title":"Developing Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix by Using Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate and Biomechanical Property Testing","authors":"M. Primasari, I. D. Saputro, L. Hariani, Glorian Paul Bosco Velusamy","doi":"10.4103/bhsj.bhsj_2_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n \n \n \n An alternative for supporting wound closure is acellular dermal matrix (ADM), which serves as a scaffold. Humans and porcine possess a similar biochemical makeup. Using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), a decellularization technique was developed and its biomechanical properties were assessed.\n \n \n \n This work uses a pig dermis layer for an in vitro experimental investigation with a posttest-only control group. Using SDS 0.5% for 14 days, the decellularization procedure compares the biomechanical properties and cellular components of the ADM with control. The Mann–Whitney U-test for data with a nonnormal distribution or the t-test for continuous variables with a normal distribution was used for the study.\n \n \n \n Histological analysis revealed that none of the cells were detected in four fields of analysis in the treatment group; however, 48.00 ± 4.86 cells were observed in the control group (P < 0.001); the collagen organization in the control group appeared to be identical. The variables elastic modulus (MPa) (136.78 vs. 129.19; P = 0.556), thickness (mm) (3.27 vs. 3.15; P = 0.397), and width (mm) (8.50 vs. 8.56; P = 0.40) did not differ statistically. The following data showed significant differences between the treatment group and the control group: break strain (%) (108.46 vs. 67.48; P < 0.001) and tensile strength stress (MPa) (19.916 vs. 22.1; P = 0.030).\n \n \n \n SDS decellularization is an efficient method for creating an ADM. Although the break strain was considerably lower, the treatment group’s tensile strength was higher. Elastic modulus changes were not observed.\n","PeriodicalId":9324,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecular and Health Science Journal","volume":"58 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecular and Health Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bhsj.bhsj_2_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT An alternative for supporting wound closure is acellular dermal matrix (ADM), which serves as a scaffold. Humans and porcine possess a similar biochemical makeup. Using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), a decellularization technique was developed and its biomechanical properties were assessed. This work uses a pig dermis layer for an in vitro experimental investigation with a posttest-only control group. Using SDS 0.5% for 14 days, the decellularization procedure compares the biomechanical properties and cellular components of the ADM with control. The Mann–Whitney U-test for data with a nonnormal distribution or the t-test for continuous variables with a normal distribution was used for the study. Histological analysis revealed that none of the cells were detected in four fields of analysis in the treatment group; however, 48.00 ± 4.86 cells were observed in the control group (P < 0.001); the collagen organization in the control group appeared to be identical. The variables elastic modulus (MPa) (136.78 vs. 129.19; P = 0.556), thickness (mm) (3.27 vs. 3.15; P = 0.397), and width (mm) (8.50 vs. 8.56; P = 0.40) did not differ statistically. The following data showed significant differences between the treatment group and the control group: break strain (%) (108.46 vs. 67.48; P < 0.001) and tensile strength stress (MPa) (19.916 vs. 22.1; P = 0.030). SDS decellularization is an efficient method for creating an ADM. Although the break strain was considerably lower, the treatment group’s tensile strength was higher. Elastic modulus changes were not observed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用十二烷基硫酸钠和生物力学特性测试开发猪细胞真皮基质
摘要 支持伤口闭合的另一种方法是用作支架的非细胞真皮基质(ADM)。人和猪具有相似的生化结构。利用十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)开发了一种脱细胞技术,并对其生物力学特性进行了评估。 这项工作使用猪的真皮层进行体外实验研究,并设置了一个只进行试验后对照组。脱细胞程序使用 0.5% 的 SDS,持续 14 天,将 ADM 的生物力学特性和细胞成分与对照组进行比较。对于非正态分布的数据采用曼-惠特尼 U 检验,对于正态分布的连续变量采用 t 检验。 组织学分析表明,治疗组在四个分析视野中均未检测到细胞;但对照组观察到 48.00 ± 4.86 个细胞(P < 0.001);对照组的胶原组织似乎相同。弹性模量 (MPa) (136.78 vs. 129.19; P = 0.556)、厚度 (mm) (3.27 vs. 3.15; P = 0.397) 和宽度 (mm) (8.50 vs. 8.56; P = 0.40) 这些变量在统计学上没有差异。以下数据显示处理组与对照组之间存在显著差异:断裂应变(%)(108.46 对 67.48;P < 0.001)和拉伸强度应力(兆帕)(19.916 对 22.1;P = 0.030)。 SDS 脱细胞是创建 ADM 的有效方法。虽然断裂应变大大降低,但处理组的拉伸强度更高。未观察到弹性模量的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing Porcine Acellular Dermal Matrix by Using Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate and Biomechanical Property Testing Characteristic Differences between Freeze-dried Tenogenic Secretomes and Freeze-dried Crude Secretomes of Mesenchymal Stem Cells under Hypoxic Conditions Orbital Structure Involvement in Midface Fractures Impacting Ocular Injury at a Tertiary Hospital in Eastern Indonesia Comparative Analysis of Nucleocapsid Antibody Levels, Neutralizing Antibodies, and Spike receptor-binding Domain in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 Patients Diathesis Hemorrhagic, Coagulation and Fibrinolytic System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1