The Development of Interim Measures Procedure in Cases Against Poland Before CJEU

Aleksander Cieśliński
{"title":"The Development of Interim Measures Procedure in Cases Against Poland Before CJEU","authors":"Aleksander Cieśliński","doi":"10.2478/wrlae-2022-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article presents a contemporary model of applying interim measures by the Court of Justice of the European Union, drawing on an increasingly rich body of case law in Polish cases. The disputes that the European Commission has engaged in with the Polish government, along with the non-standard obstruction in compliance with EU law, have become the basis for a new approach to this ancillary procedure offered by the Rules of Procedure of the Court. The article focuses on two sensitive areas where judicial intervention has proved necessary, the protection of the natural environment and ensuring the rule of law, especially in the operation of the national judiciary. There is no doubt that this body of work constitutes a significant contribution to the overall development of EU law, as it has led to the adoption of a completely new interpretation of Article 279 TFEU. According to the latest case law, the possibility of imposing financial penalties on member states is not limited to cases provided for in Article 260 TFEU, that is, non-compliance with a judgment finding a breach of EU law; these penalties can also be imposed in cases of non-compliance with the Court’s interim orders.","PeriodicalId":516881,"journal":{"name":"Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics","volume":"172 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/wrlae-2022-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents a contemporary model of applying interim measures by the Court of Justice of the European Union, drawing on an increasingly rich body of case law in Polish cases. The disputes that the European Commission has engaged in with the Polish government, along with the non-standard obstruction in compliance with EU law, have become the basis for a new approach to this ancillary procedure offered by the Rules of Procedure of the Court. The article focuses on two sensitive areas where judicial intervention has proved necessary, the protection of the natural environment and ensuring the rule of law, especially in the operation of the national judiciary. There is no doubt that this body of work constitutes a significant contribution to the overall development of EU law, as it has led to the adoption of a completely new interpretation of Article 279 TFEU. According to the latest case law, the possibility of imposing financial penalties on member states is not limited to cases provided for in Article 260 TFEU, that is, non-compliance with a judgment finding a breach of EU law; these penalties can also be imposed in cases of non-compliance with the Court’s interim orders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟法院审理的针对波兰的案件中临时措施程序的发展
本文借鉴日益丰富的波兰案例法,介绍了欧盟法院适用临时措施的当代模式。欧盟委员会与波兰政府之间的争端,以及在遵守欧盟法律方面的非标准阻碍,已成为法院《程序规则》为这一辅助程序提供新方法的基础。文章主要关注两个敏感领域,在这两个领域中,司法干预已被证明是必要的,即保护自然环境和确保法治,尤其是在国家司法机构的运作中。毫无疑问,这一系列工作对欧盟法律的整体发展做出了重大贡献,因为它导致通过了对《欧盟运作条约》第 279 条的全新解释。根据最新的判例法,对成员国实施经济处罚的可能性并不局限于《欧盟运作条约》第 260 条规定的情况,即不遵守认定违反欧盟法律的判决的情况;在不遵守法院临时命令的情况下也可以实施这些处罚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Development of Interim Measures Procedure in Cases Against Poland Before CJEU The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Civil Proceedings in Poland Gold-plating of EU Law in the Czech Republic Revisited Pitfalls in Implementing the EU Whistleblower Directive The Progressive Recognition of the Fundamental Right to a Healthy Environment and the Role of the Courts in Ensuring Its Protection1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1