From the COVID-19 lockdown to the new normal: Two-year changes in daily stress and positive event processes.

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Stress and Health Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1002/smi.3423
Patrick Klaiber, Eeske van Roekel, Anita DeLongis, Nancy L Sin
{"title":"From the COVID-19 lockdown to the new normal: Two-year changes in daily stress and positive event processes.","authors":"Patrick Klaiber, Eeske van Roekel, Anita DeLongis, Nancy L Sin","doi":"10.1002/smi.3423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The emergence of the novel COVID-19 disease and the social distancing measures implemented to curb its spread affected most aspects of daily life. Past work suggests that during times of more severe stress, people respond to daily stressors with relatively higher negative affect. However, little is known about how people responded to daily stressors and positive events at different moments in time during the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, we examined longitudinal changes in daily event-related affect (covariation of daily stressors or positive events with same-day affect) from Spring 2020 (wave 1) to 2022 (wave 2). The sample consisted of 324 adults aged 18-80 (mean = 52 years; 89% women) from the US and Canada who completed weeklong daily diaries at both waves. The results revealed improvements in affective well-being, stressor-related affect (i.e., smaller fluctuations in affect on stressor days vs. nonstressor days), and positive event-related affect (i.e., lower negative affect on days with vs. without positive events). Furthermore, as people gradually resumed their social activities from 2020 to 2022, people reported being exposed to an increased frequency of both stressors and positive events. This study highlights the potential influence of socio-historical phenomena, such as an ongoing pandemic, on the events that people encounter and how they emotionally respond to them.</p>","PeriodicalId":51175,"journal":{"name":"Stress and Health","volume":" ","pages":"e3423"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3423","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emergence of the novel COVID-19 disease and the social distancing measures implemented to curb its spread affected most aspects of daily life. Past work suggests that during times of more severe stress, people respond to daily stressors with relatively higher negative affect. However, little is known about how people responded to daily stressors and positive events at different moments in time during the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, we examined longitudinal changes in daily event-related affect (covariation of daily stressors or positive events with same-day affect) from Spring 2020 (wave 1) to 2022 (wave 2). The sample consisted of 324 adults aged 18-80 (mean = 52 years; 89% women) from the US and Canada who completed weeklong daily diaries at both waves. The results revealed improvements in affective well-being, stressor-related affect (i.e., smaller fluctuations in affect on stressor days vs. nonstressor days), and positive event-related affect (i.e., lower negative affect on days with vs. without positive events). Furthermore, as people gradually resumed their social activities from 2020 to 2022, people reported being exposed to an increased frequency of both stressors and positive events. This study highlights the potential influence of socio-historical phenomena, such as an ongoing pandemic, on the events that people encounter and how they emotionally respond to them.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从 COVID-19 封锁到新常态:日常压力和积极事件过程的两年变化。
新型 COVID-19 疾病的出现以及为遏制其传播而采取的社会疏远措施影响了日常生活的方方面面。过去的研究表明,在压力比较大的时候,人们会对日常压力做出相对较高的负面影响反应。然而,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,人们在不同时刻对日常压力源和积极事件的反应却鲜为人知。因此,我们研究了 2020 年春季(第 1 次调查)至 2022 年(第 2 次调查)期间日常事件相关情绪的纵向变化(日常压力源或积极事件与当日情绪的协变)。样本包括来自美国和加拿大的 324 名年龄在 18-80 岁之间的成年人(平均年龄为 52 岁;89% 为女性),他们在两个阶段都填写了为期一周的每日日记。结果显示,人们在情感幸福感、压力相关情感(即压力日与非压力日情感波动较小)和积极事件相关情感(即有积极事件日与无积极事件日负面情感较低)方面都有所改善。此外,从 2020 年到 2022 年,随着人们逐渐恢复社交活动,人们报告说接触压力源和积极事件的频率都有所增加。这项研究强调了社会历史现象(如正在发生的大流行病)对人们遇到的事件及其情绪反应的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Stress and Health
Stress and Health 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Stress is a normal component of life and a number of mechanisms exist to cope with its effects. The stresses that challenge man"s existence in our modern society may result in failure of these coping mechanisms, with resultant stress-induced illness. The aim of the journal therefore is to provide a forum for discussion of all aspects of stress which affect the individual in both health and disease. The Journal explores the subject from as many aspects as possible, so that when stress becomes a consideration, health information can be presented as to the best ways by which to minimise its effects.
期刊最新文献
Destructive Self-Leadership? Self-Leadership, Maladaptive Coping, and Stress in College Students. Global Research on Cyberchondria: Scientometric and Visual Analysis From 2003 to 2022. Psychological Distress, Resources, and Coping Strategies Among Evacuees and Non-Evacuees From an Armed Conflict Zone: A Network Analysis. Reflective Abstract Processing Reduces Negative Emotions Independent of Self-Perspective. The Impact of Physical Activity on the Disability-Related Stress of Individuals With Physical Disabilities: A Five-Year Longitudinal Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1